Rebecca J Evans-Polce1, Phillip T Veliz2, Carol J Boyd2,3, Tonda L Hughes4, Sean Esteban McCabe2,5. 1. Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. bjevans@umich.edu. 2. Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 N. Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Addiction Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 5. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sexual minorities are at heightened risk for substance use disorders (SUDs). Discrimination based on sexual orientation may be an important factor in this increased risk, but differences across age have not been systematically examined. We examined age-varying associations of sexual orientation discrimination with alcohol use disorder (AUD), tobacco use disorder (TUD), and drug use disorder (DUD). METHODS: We used data from US participants aged 18-50 years who reported non-heterosexual identity, attraction, or behavior (N = 2375) in a nationally representative survey. We examined the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination across age and its salience as a risk factor for AUD, TUD, and DUD for gay/lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual identifying individuals using time-varying effect modeling. RESULTS: Sexual orientation discrimination was most prevalent in early young adulthood but was positively associated with greater odds of AUD, TUD, and DUD only at later ages. We found statistically significant associations at ages 24.5-40.0 for AUD, ages 32.5-42.9 for DUD, and ages 39.3-43.2 for TUD. For example, discrimination at age 30 was associated with 2.1 times greater odds of AUD (95% CI 1.3, 3.3) compared to those who reported no discrimination at that age. Discrimination at age 35 was associated with 2.8 times greater odds of DUD (95% CI 1.2, 6.6) relative to no discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual orientation discrimination is significantly associated with SUDs and risk varies across age. Thus, age should be considered in the development of prevention and treatment of AUD, TUD, and DUD, particularly for sexual minorities.
PURPOSE: Sexual minorities are at heightened risk for substance use disorders (SUDs). Discrimination based on sexual orientation may be an important factor in this increased risk, but differences across age have not been systematically examined. We examined age-varying associations of sexual orientation discrimination with alcohol use disorder (AUD), tobacco use disorder (TUD), and drug use disorder (DUD). METHODS: We used data from US participants aged 18-50 years who reported non-heterosexual identity, attraction, or behavior (N = 2375) in a nationally representative survey. We examined the prevalence of sexual orientation discrimination across age and its salience as a risk factor for AUD, TUD, and DUD for gay/lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual identifying individuals using time-varying effect modeling. RESULTS: Sexual orientation discrimination was most prevalent in early young adulthood but was positively associated with greater odds of AUD, TUD, and DUD only at later ages. We found statistically significant associations at ages 24.5-40.0 for AUD, ages 32.5-42.9 for DUD, and ages 39.3-43.2 for TUD. For example, discrimination at age 30 was associated with 2.1 times greater odds of AUD (95% CI 1.3, 3.3) compared to those who reported no discrimination at that age. Discrimination at age 35 was associated with 2.8 times greater odds of DUD (95% CI 1.2, 6.6) relative to no discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual orientation discrimination is significantly associated with SUDs and risk varies across age. Thus, age should be considered in the development of prevention and treatment of AUD, TUD, and DUD, particularly for sexual minorities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Discrimination; Sexual minorities; Substance use disorders; Time-varying effect models
Authors: Sean Esteban McCabe; Alicia K Matthews; Joseph G L Lee; Phil Veliz; Tonda L Hughes; Carol J Boyd Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Katie A McLaughlin; Katherine M Keyes; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Arryn A Guy; David G Zelaya; Anthony Surace; Nadine R Mastroleo; David W Pantalone; Peter M Monti; Kenneth H Mayer; Christopher W Kahler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Rebecca J Evans-Polce; Luisa Kcomt; Philip T Veliz; Carol J Boyd; Sean Esteban McCabe Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Drew A Westmoreland; Adam W Carrico; Renee D Goodwin; David W Pantalone; Denis Nash; Christian Grov Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Hee-Jin Jun; Megan Webb-Morgan; Jennifer K Felner; Jennifer P Wisdom; Sean J Haley; S Bryn Austin; Laura M Katuska; Heather L Corliss Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 4.492