Literature DB >> 30902638

Impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Margin Guidelines on Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Trends.

Olga Kantor1, Catherine Pesce2, Katherine Kopkash2, Ermilo Barrera2, David J Winchester2, Kristine Kuchta3, Katharine Yao4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines defined negative margin for stage I and II breast cancer as "no tumor on ink." We hypothesized that repeat operation rates have decreased since the guideline introduction and would be associated with changes in overall surgical trends. STUDY
DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women who underwent initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for stage I and II breast cancer from 2004 to 2015.
RESULTS: Of 521,578 patients that underwent initial BCS, 82.7% had BCS alone and 17.3% had repeat operation: 67% with BCS followed by another BCS, 24% with BCS followed by unilateral mastectomy, and 9% with BCS followed by bilateral mastectomy (BM). The repeat operation rate decreased from 16.2% in 2004 to 14.0% in 2015 (p < 0.01). Breast-conserving surgery with repeat BCS decreased from 12.8% to 9.7%, and BCS followed by BM increased from 0.7% in 2004 to 1.9% 2013, then decreased to 1.4% in 2015. Trends for all surgical patients regardless of initial procedure showed a BCS rate of 64.0% in 2013 that increased to 67.6% in 2015. The BM rate increased from 4.6% in 2004 to 13.6% in 2013, then decreased to 12.8% in 2015 (p < 0.05). Adjusted multivariable regression found independent predictors of repeat operation to be diagnosis before 2014 (odds ratio [OR] 1.25), age younger than 50 years (OR 1.70), Her2neu receptor-positive tumors (OR 1.61), and lobular histology (OR 1.61).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat operation rates are decreasing after 2014, which is also associated with a rise in BCS and decrease in BM rates. Dissemination of margin guidelines for early-stage breast cancer might be impacting overall surgical trends.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30902638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

1.  The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Automated assessment of breast margins in deep ultraviolet fluorescence images using texture analysis.

Authors:  Tongtong Lu; Julie M Jorns; Dong Hye Ye; Mollie Patton; Renee Fisher; Amanda Emmrich; Taly Gilat Schmidt; Tina Yen; Bing Yu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Tumor deformation correction for an image guidance system in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon Heiselman; Morgan Ringel; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Ablative liver radiotherapy for unresected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Patterns of care and survival in the United States.

Authors:  Brian De; Hop S Tran Cao; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Gohar S Manzar; Kelsey L Corrigan; Kanwal P S Raghav; Sunyoung S Lee; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Bruce D Minsky; Grace L Smith; Emma B Holliday; Cullen M Taniguchi; Albert C Koong; Prajnan Das; Milind Javle; Ethan B Ludmir; Eugene J Koay
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.921

5.  Rapid assessment of breast tumor margins using deep ultraviolet fluorescence scanning microscopy.

Authors:  Tongtong Lu; Julie M Jorns; Mollie Patton; Renee Fisher; Amanda Emmrich; Todd Doehring; Taly Gilat Schmidt; Dong Hye Ye; Tina Yen; Bing Yu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.170

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.