Literature DB >> 30902153

The physical nature of subjective experience and its interaction with the brain.

Fredric Schiffer1.   

Abstract

Penrose and Hameroff assert that brain computations, including quantum computations, involving hydrophobic areas of microtubules whose electron clouds go into orchestrated superpositions and reductions that lead to proto-conscious elements, or "bings" that become orchestrated into conscious experiences. Their assertion, however, like the findings of the neural correlates of consciousness, does not explain subjectivity, but rather describes necessary conditions for it. Many scientists, including Panksepp, Demasio, and Tononi, have each made great contributions to the field, but none explains how material biological processes acquire subjectivity. Yet, the fact is that subjectivity exists and is and of great importance to evolution. Penrose argues that understanding, which involves subjectivity, must be brought into physics, perhaps an undiscovered aspect. Subjectivity is always of or about certain living brain information even though most brain functions do not have subjectivity. Many quantum fields are known to exist and follow Dyson's definition: "a kind of tension or stress which can exist in empty space in the absence of matter. It reveals itself by producing forces, which act on any material objects that happen to lie in the space the field occupies." My hypothesis is that there may be undiscovered quantum fields, which unlike known fields, induce subjectivity when they interact with certain brain information. They emit quantum particles that exert force and cause changes to material objects (brain patterns conveying information) with which they interact. Information that transports meaning to living material exerts force through the understanding it conveys. There is a continuous interplay between experience and brain information. Experiences profoundly inform the brain and alter brain structure, function, and behavior, and local and integrated brain functions process information and initiate multiple associated experiences. Most experience is non-conscious, as discussed by Wright and others, like the soundtrack of a movie to which our brains respond continuously and emotionally even though, we are only intermittently consciously aware of it. I will explore how non-conscious experience may relate to the self, and how it might become conscious. I will offer present support and directions for testing this plausible hypothesis, as well as potential clinical applications in psychology.
Copyright © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Brain information; Consciousness; Experience; Non-conscious; Quantum field; Subjectivity; The hard problem

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30902153     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  2 in total

Review 1.  Fascial Nomenclature: Update 2022.

Authors:  Bruno Bordoni; Allan R Escher; Filippo Tobbi; Luigi Pianese; Antonio Ciardo; Jay Yamahata; Saul Hernandez; Oscar Sanchez
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  A Novel Treatment of Opioid Cravings With an Effect Size of .73 for Unilateral Transcranial Photobiomodulation Over Sham.

Authors:  Fredric Schiffer; William Reichmann; Edward Flynn; Michael R Hamblin; Hannah McCormack
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.