Literature DB >> 30902152

Is muscle growth a mechanism for increasing strength?

Jeremy P Loenneke1, Scott J Dankel2, Zachary W Bell2, Samuel L Buckner3, Kevin T Mattocks4, Matthew B Jessee5, Takashi Abe2.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy commonly occurs with repeated bouts of resistance exercise as well as following the administration of exogenous drugs. This increase in muscle size is thought to be mechanistically important for the increase in muscle function. However, at present, there is no experimental evidence that would support any paradigm in which muscle hypertrophy is a mechanism for increasing strength with exercise. Therefore, it seems reasonable to also question the importance of changes in muscle size for changes in muscle strength (function) following exogenous drugs as well as aging, where both muscle size and strength decrease. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether changes in muscle size contribute to changes in voluntary strength following exercise, pharmaceutical interventions, and aging. We also aim to provide potential mechanisms (central and peripheral) for the change in strength as well as outline study designs to better address this question. Herein, we suggest that there are dissociations between changes in muscle size and strength following exercise, anabolic drug administration, and aging (to a point). These dissociations occur throughout the literature, suggesting that these changes may be completely separate phenomena. We are not dismissing the potential importance of maintaining muscle mass, particularly in clinical populations. What we are suggesting, however, is that muscle function may not necessarily be improved by these exercise or pharmacological induced increases in muscle size. Exploring mechanisms and explanations beyond just changes in muscle size may improve therapy targeted at improving muscle function.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30902152     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  6 in total

1.  Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  A Retrospective Analysis to Determine Whether Training-Induced Changes in Muscle Thickness Mediate Changes in Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Matthew B Jessee; Scott J Dankel; John P Bentley; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Moderate Increase in Protein Intake Promotes a Small Additional Improvement in Functional Capacity, But Not in Muscle Strength and Lean Mass Quality, in Postmenopausal Women Following Resistance Exercise: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paula C Nahas; Luana T Rossato; Fernanda M Martins; Aletéia P Souza; Flávia M S de Branco; Marcelo A S Carneiro; Kely R C Teixeira; Fábio L Orsatti; Erick P de Oliveira
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Variables Influencing the Effectiveness of Creatine Supplementation as a Therapeutic Intervention for Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Darren G Candow; Scott C Forbes; Philip D Chilibeck; Stephen M Cornish; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2019-08-09

6.  The influence of considering individual resistance training variables as a whole on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Philip M Lyristakis; Daniel W T Wundersitz; Emma K Zadow; George Mnatzaganian; Brett A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.