| Literature DB >> 30902089 |
Klara Janjić1,2, Barbara Cvikl1,2, Barbara Schädl2,3,4, Andreas Moritz1,2, Hermann Agis5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Development in guided tissue regeneration requires biomaterial testing. 3D cell constructs represent a new approach to bridge the gap between cell culture and animal models. Following the hypothesis that attachment behavior of cells could be observed in toroidal 3D cell constructs, the aim of this study was to evaluate 3D gingival fibroblast (GF) toroids as a simple and feasible in vitro assay to test attachment of oral fibroblasts to collagen membranes.Entities:
Keywords: Gingiva; Guided tissue regeneration; Microtissue; Toroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30902089 PMCID: PMC6429709 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0736-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Fig. 1Formation of gingival fibroblast toroids. Human gingival fibroblasts were seeded into agarose molds and evenly settled into toroid-shaped recesses. After 24 h, toroids contracted to a compact 3D structure where the lumen is not visible anymore. HE-stained toroids show numerous basophilic cell nuclei of similar shapes and even distribution
Attachment score of gingival fibroblast toroids, spheroids and monolayers on plastic or collagen membranes
|
|
|
| Toroid | |
| Spheroid | |
| Monolayer |
|
|
|
|
| Toroid | |
| Spheroid | |
| Monolayer |
|
Gingival fibroblast monolayers attached (+) in five of five cases, spheroids in three of five cases and toroids in two of five cases to plastic and collagen membrane surfaces for 72 h, respectively
Fig. 2Attachment and metabolic activity of gingival fibroblast toroids on plastic or collagen membranes. Gingival fibroblast toroids on plastic (N = 5) (a) did not show any changes in shape over 72 h, but were metabolically active as shown in relative fluorescence units (N = 3) (b). Gingival fibroblast toroids on collagen membranes showed dilatation after 48 h and 72 h (N = 5) (c) and were metabolically active over the whole observation period (N = 3) (d). Error bars represent standard deviation
Fig. 4Attachment and metabolic activity of gingival fibroblast monolayers on plastic or collagen membranes. Gingival fibroblast monolayers did not show any changes in shape within 72 h, neither on plastic (N = 5) (a) nor on collagen membranes (N = 5) (c). Gingival fibroblast monolayers were metabolically active over the 72 h observation period when seeded on plastic (N = 3) (b) or collagen membranes (N = 3) (d), as shown in relative fluorescence units. Error bars represent standard deviation
Fig. 3Attachment and metabolic activity of gingival fibroblast spheroids on plastic or collagen membranes. Gingival fibroblast spheroids did not show any changes in shape within 72 h, neither on plastic (N = 5) (a) nor on collagen membranes (N = 5) (c). Gingival fibroblast spheroids were metabolically active over the 72 h observation period when seeded on plastic (N = 3) (b) or collagen membranes (N = 3) (d), as shown in relative fluorescence units. Error bars represent standard deviation