Literature DB >> 30901785

Assessing the performance of GIS- based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion.

Younes Garosi1, Mohsen Sheklabadi2, Christian Conoscenti3, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi4, Kristof Van Oost5.   

Abstract

The main purpose was to compare discrimination and reliability of four machine learning models to create gully erosion susceptibility map (GESM) in a part of Ekbatan Dam Basin, Hamedan, western Iran. Extensive field surveys using GPS, and the visual interpretation of satellite images, used to prepare a digital map of the spatial distribution of gullies. 130 locations were sampled to elucidate the spatial distribution of the soil surface properties. Topographic attributes were provided from digital elevation model (DEM). The land use and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) maps were created by satellite imagery. The functional relationships between gully erosion and controlling factors were calculated using the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), and generalized additive model (GAM) models. The performance of models was evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation based on efficiency, Kappa coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The results showed that the RF model had the highest amount of efficiency, Kappa coefficient, and AUC and the lowest amounts of MAE and RMSE compared with SVM, NB, and GAM. The RF model showed the highest predictive performance (mean AUC = 92.4%), followed by SVM (mean AUC = 90.9%), GAM (mean AUC = 89.9%), and NB (mean AUC = 87.2%) models. Overall accuracy of the models ranged from excellent (NB, GAM) to outstanding (RF, SVM) classes. The capacity of all models for creating GESM was quite stable when the calibration and validation samples were changed through10-fold cross-validation technique. According to variable importance analysis performed by RF model, the most important variables are distance from rivers, calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), and topographic position index (TPI). The obtained maps can help identifying areas at risk of gully erosion and facilitate the implementation of plans for soil conservation and sustainable management.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrimination; Gully erosion susceptibility; Latin hypercube sampling technique (cLHS); Machine learning models; Reliability; Topographic attributes

Year:  2019        PMID: 30901785     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of the outbreak risk, mapping and infection behavior of COVID-19: Application of the autoregressive integrated-moving average (ARIMA) and polynomial models.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Pourghasemi; Soheila Pouyan; Zakariya Farajzadeh; Nitheshnirmal Sadhasivam; Bahram Heidari; Sedigheh Babaei; John P Tiefenbacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Identification of Soil Properties Associated with the Incidence of Banana Wilt Using Supervised Methods.

Authors:  Barlin O Olivares; Andrés Vega; María A Rueda Calderón; Juan C Rey; Deyanira Lobo; José A Gómez; Blanca B Landa
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.