Literature DB >> 30901460

A Comparative in vivo Study of Semi-constrained and Unconstrained Cervical Artificial Disc Prostheses.

Hoon Choi1, Jamie L Baisden1, Narayan Yoganandan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to directly compare different types of cervical artificial disc implants using an in vivo model capable of simulating the axial load on a neck that is similar to the human neck.
METHODS: Cervical arthroplasty was performed at C3-4 in 14 healthy female adult Alpine goats. The goats were divided into three groups. Group A received Bryan (unconstrained one-piece design); Group B received ProDisc-C (semi-constrained two-piece design); and Group C received Mobi-C (unconstrained three-piece design) artificial discs. The goats were monitored in a veterinary unit for 6 months with radiography at regular intervals.
RESULTS: Each goat tolerated cervical arthroplasty well and had satisfactory placement of their implant per intra-operative radiography. Implants monitored in Group A demonstrated no migration. One out of five implants in Group B experienced anterior migration at 3 months. In Group C, anterior migration and disintegration occurred in all four implants, with migration occurring during the first postoperative week in three implants and after 5 weeks in the fourth.
CONCLUSIONS: Unconstrained multi-piece artificial cervical discs may be prone to anterior migration and extrusion out of the disc space. This outcome deserves attention in individuals with a hypermobile neck and/or an occupation involving the use of a head-supported mass, such as helmets. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; artificial disc; migration

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30901460     DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Yuvaraj Purushothaman; Jamie Baisden; Narayan Yoganandan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Da He; Ning Zhang; Qingpeng Song; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Mid- to long-term rates of symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery after cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yifei Deng; Guangzhou Li; Hao Liu; Ying Hong; Yang Meng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.