| Literature DB >> 30900584 |
Charudutt Kalamkar1, Amrita Mukherjee1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the incidence, modes of injury, treatment, and short-term outcomes in eyes with post-traumatic elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).Entities:
Keywords: Closed globe injury; incidence; open globe injury; outcomes; pediatric; post-traumatic glaucoma
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30900584 PMCID: PMC6446624 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_655_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Comparison of demographics and baseline characteristics in eyes with closed and open globe injury
| Variable | Closed globe injury ( | Open globe injury ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) ( mean±standard deviation) | 10.3±3.4 | 9.8±3.7 | 0.74 |
| Gender (% boys) | 22 (88%) | 5 (71%) | 0.29 |
| Zone of injury | |||
| Zone 1 | 2 (8%) | 1 (14%) | 0.59 |
| Zone 2 | 16 (64%) | 3 (43%) | |
| Zone 3 | 7 (28%) | 3 (43%) | |
| Time of presentation (in days) | 5.4±4.1 | 3.3±2.7 | 0.33 |
| Mean IOP (mmHg) | 30.4±6.8 | 27.5±3.1 | 0.45 |
| Time of glaucoma diagnosis | |||
| At first presentation | 10 (40%) | 0 | <0.001 |
| <1 month of trauma | 14 (56%) | 1 (14%) | |
| >1 month of trauma | 1 (4%) | 6 (86%) | |
| Hyphema (%) | 12 (48%) | 0 | 0.04 |
| Cataract (%) | 12 (48%) | 1 (14%) | 0.12 |
| Posterior segment (%) | 6 (24%) | 3 (43%) | 0.33 |
| Baseline BCVA (logMAR) (mean±standard deviation) | 1.5±0.6 | 1.7±0.5 | 0.37 |
| Causes of IOP elevation | |||
| Hyphema | 10 (40%) | 0 | <0.001 |
| Angle recession | 6 (24%) | 0 | |
| Lens induced | 5 (20%) | 1 (14%) | |
| Mixed mechanism | 0 | 5 (72%) | |
| Pigmentary | 3 (12%) | 0 | |
| Uveitic | 0 | 1 (14%) |
IOP=Intraocular pressure, BCVA=Best-corrected visual acuity
Comparison of treatment and outcomes in eyes with CGI vs. OGI
| Variable | Closed globe injury ( | Open globe injury ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical management | 11 (44%) | 1 (14%) | 0.16 |
| Type of surgery | |||
| AC wash | 2 (8%) | 0 | 0.44 |
| Cataract extraction | 12 (48%) | 1 (14%) | 0.12 |
| Trabeculectomy±mitomycin-C | 6 (24%) | 0 | 0.03 |
| Drainage implant (Ahmed glaucoma valve) | 2 (8%) | 0 | 0.44 |
| Final IOP (mmHg) | 16.3±2.4 | 15.6±1.8 | 0.44 |
| Final BCVA | 0.75±0.6 | 10.4±0.7 | 0.27 |
| Follow-up duration (months) | 10.3±7.9 | 11.3±11.4 | 0.89 |
AC=Anterior chamber, IOP=Intraocular pressure, BCVA=Best-corrected visual acuity, CGI=Closed globe injury, OGI=Open globe injury
Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis of factors predictive of IOP drop at final follow up
| Variable | Interval | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β coeff | 95% CI | β coeff | 95% CI | ||||
| Age | 1 year increment | −0.03 | −0.6 to 0.5 | 0.92 | - | - | - |
| Gender | Male vs. female | −4.1 | −9.6 to 1.4 | 0.14 | - | - | - |
| Trauma | CGI vs. OGI | −2.12 | −7.1 to 2.8 | 0.39 | 3.24 | −6.2 to 12.2 | 0.48 |
| Zone | Vs. Zone 1 | 0.56 | −2.9 to 4.1 | 0.75 | 0.36 | −3.4 to 4.2 | 0.84 |
| Baseline BCVA | 0.1 logMAR increment | 0.90 | −2.5 to 4.4 | 0.60 | 2.26 | −2.1 to 6.6 | 0.30 |
| Angle recession | Vs. no recession | 4.32 | −0.8 to 9.4 | 0.09 | 4.76 | −5.2 to 14.7 | 0.34 |
| Surgery | Vs. medical treatment | 1.88 | −2.3 to 6.2 | 0.37 | 1.56 | −3.1 to 6.2 | 0.50 |
| Timing of glaucoma | Vs. at presentation | −1.08 | −3.9 to 1.8 | 0.45 | −2.06 | −6.9 to 2.8 | 0.39 |
BCVA=Best-corrected visual acuity, CGI=Closed globe injury, OGI=Open globe injury
Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis of factors predictive of BCVA at final follow up
| Variable | Interval | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β coeff | 95% CI | β coeff | 95% CI | ||||
| Age | 1 year increment | −0.06 | −0.2 to 0.03 | 0.6 | - | - | - |
| Gender | Male vs. female | 0.29 | −0.4 to 0.9 | 0.37 | - | - | - |
| Trauma | CGI vs. OGI | 0.29 | −0.3 to 0.8 | 0.31 | 0.11 | −0.3 to 0.5 | 0.55 |
| Zone | Vs. Zone 1 | 0.71 | 0.41-1.0 | 0.001 | 0.15 | −0.3 to 0.5 | 0.48 |
| Baseline BCVA | 0.1 logMAR increment | 0.59 | 0.25-0.92 | 0.001 | 0.31 | 0.02-0.6 | 0.03 |
| Baseline IOP | 1 mmHg increment | 0.02 | −0.1 to 0.1 | 0.24 | - | - | - |
| Final IOP | 1 mmHg increment | 0.01 | −0.1 to 0.1 | 0.28 | - | - | - |
| Angle recession | Vs. no recession | 0.65 | 0.09-1.2 | 0.02 | 0.29 | −0.1 to 0.7 | 0.17 |
| Post segment | Vs. no involvement | 1.02 | 0.65-1.3 | <0.001 | 0.67 | 0.1-1.25 | 0.025 |
| Surgical treatment | Vs. medical treatment | 0.29 | −0.2 to 0.7 | 0.22 | - | - | - |
BCVA=Best-corrected visual acuity, CGI=Closed globe injury, OGI=Open globe injury, IOP=Intraocular pressure
Figure 1Scatter plot with LOWESS curve showing correlation between pre-treatment and post-treatment intraocular pressure in eyes with closed and open globe injury
Figure 2“Gulli-danda” – small wooden projectile “gulli” and wooden stick “danda”