Literature DB >> 30900433

Variability among Canadian pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists in the management of cryptorchidism in boys before the publication of major guidelines: a retrospective review of a single tertiary centre

Jin K. Kim1, Michael E. Chua1, Jessica M. Ming1, Min Joon Lee1, Amre Kesavan1, Nathaniel Kahn1, Jacob C. Langer1, Armando Lorenzo1, Darius Bagli1, Walid A. Farhat1, Frank Papanikolaou1, Martin A. Koyle1.   

Abstract

Background: Before 2014, there was a lack of recommendations on managing cryptorchidism, or undescended testis (UDT), from a large pediatric urological or surgical organization. We assessed the variability in management of UDT among pediatric urologists and pediatric surgeons at a single tertiary pediatric referral centre before publication of major guidelines.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic records of patients who underwent primary unilateral or bilateral orchidopexy at our centre between January 2012 and January 2014.
Results: A total of 488 patients (616 testes) were identified, of whom 405 (83.0%) and 83 (17.0%) were managed by pediatric urologists and pediatric surgeons, respectively. There was no difference in baseline characteristics, including age seen in clinic or at surgery, testis location/palpability and availability of preoperative ultrasonograms, of patients seen by the 2 groups. Pediatric surgeons ordered preoperative ultrasonography more often than pediatric urologists (25.3% v. 3.7%, p < 0.001). With palpable UDTs, although both groups used open approaches, pediatric urologists preferred a scrotal approach (56.9%), and pediatric surgeons approached most testes inguinally (98.8%). With nonpalpable UDTs, laparoscopic approaches were preferred by both groups; however, pediatric urologists used a 2-stage Fowler–Stephens approach more often than pediatric surgeons (48.4% v. 15.8%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: There was wide variation in the management of primary UDT between pediatric urologists and pediatric surgeons before the publication of guidelines. The most prominent difference between the 2 groups was in the ordering of preoperative ultrasonography. Future assessment of change in practice patterns may elucidate whether guidelines are an effective tool for standardization of practice.
© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30900433      PMCID: PMC6738503          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  22 in total

1.  Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine.

Authors:  D Isaacs; D Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999 Dec 18-25

2.  Incidence of undescended testis in the newborn.

Authors:  B BUEMANN; H HENRIKSEN; A L VILLUMSEN; A WESTH; B ZACHAU-CHRISTIANSEN
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1961

3.  Does standardization of care through clinical guidelines improve outcomes and reduce medical liability?

Authors:  Douglas H Kirkpatrick; Ronald T Burkman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prospective study on the prevalence and associated risk factors of cryptorchidism in 6246 newborn boys from Nice area, France.

Authors:  K Wagner-Mahler; J-Y Kurzenne; I Delattre; E Bérard; J-C Mas; L Bornebush; C Tommasi; M Boda-Buccino; B Ducot; C Boullé; P Ferrari; P Azuar; A Bongain; P Fénichel; F Brucker-Davis
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2011-08-10

5.  Delayed diagnosis for undescended testes.

Authors:  C K Sinha; S Vinay; R Kulkarni; S Nour
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  Orchidopexy patterns in Austria from 1993 to 2009.

Authors:  Alexander Springer; Ramnath Subramaniam; Christoph Krall; Gerhard Fülöp
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 1.830

7.  Higher than expected prevalence of congenital cryptorchidism in Lithuania: a study of 1204 boys at birth and 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  R T Preiksa; B Zilaitiene; V Matulevicius; N E Skakkebaek; J H Petersen; N Jørgensen; J Toppari
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Cryptorchidism: aspects of fertility and neoplasms. A study including data of 1,335 consecutive boys who underwent testicular biopsy simultaneously with surgery for cryptorchidism.

Authors:  D Cortes; J M Thorup; J Visfeldt
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  2001

Review 9.  Prepubertal orchiopexy for cryptorchidism may be associated with lower risk of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Walsh; Marc A Dall'Era; Mary S Croughan; Peter R Carroll; Paul J Turek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the perspectives of the pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists in management of cryptorchidism in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Osama A Bawazir; Abdulrahman Maghrabi; Omemh Abdullah Bawazeer; Soliman Binyahib; Razan Bawazir; Nawaf Halabi; Abdullah Bawazir
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.422

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.