| Literature DB >> 30900265 |
Katrijn R Six1,2, Géraldine Sicot3, Rosalie Devloo1, Hendrik B Feys1,2, Dominique Baruch3,4, Veerle Compernolle1,2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Several sources of haematopoietic stem cells have been used for static culture of megakaryocytes to produce platelets in vitro. This study compares and characterizes platelets produced in shear flow using precursor cells from either umbilical (UCB) or adult peripheral blood (PB).Entities:
Keywords: haematopoiesis; megakaryopoiesis; platelets; stem cells; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30900265 PMCID: PMC6850637 DOI: 10.1111/vox.12776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vox Sang ISSN: 0042-9007 Impact factor: 2.144
Absolute number of total nucleated cells before isolation and of CD34+ cells after isolation from PB or UCB
| UCB | PB | |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute number of total nucleated cells per sample before isolation (×108) | 1·49 ± 0·65 | 6·93 ± 1·73 |
| Absolute number of CD34+ cells per sample after isolation (×105) | 16·97 ± 6·49 | 3·93 ± 1·35 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD (n ≥ 14).
Figure 1Static cell culture of HSC derived from PB or UCB. (a) The percentage HSC obtained by magnetic isolation per total nucleated cells in UCB (□) or PB (●) samples. (b) The proliferation (all cells), in function of time, expressed as fold increase relative to the number of cells seeded on D0. (c) Expression of CD34 and (d) CD42b/CD41 markers on cultured cells as measured by flow cytometry as a function of time. Data are shown as mean with SD (n ≥ 5). Statistical analysis results are shown as *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001 and ****P < 0·0001.
Figure 2Platelet production in hydrodynamic flow. (a) Representative image of cell anchorage (*) to VWF‐coated pillars (white dots) of a cultured cell (D12) started from UCB and (b) PB. Cell elongation and (pro)platelet formation is indicated by red arrows. The flow direction is shown by a white arrow. (c) The number of PLP produced per input cell during the perfusion experiment. Data are given as mean with SD (n ≥ 12). Statistical analysis results are shown as *P < 0·05. (d and e) The PLP yield was plotted as a function of the number of CD42b/CD41 double positive input cells for (d) UCB (n = 36) and (e) PB (n = 13).
Figure 3Expression of platelet markers. The fraction of PLP that was staining positive for (a) CD42b, (b) CD41, (c) CD42b/CD41 and (d) CD61 produced from UCB (open bars) and PB (closed bars). Data are shown as mean with SD (n ≥ 5).
Figure 4Number of platelet receptors. The number of (a) CD42b, (b) CD61 and (c) CD49b receptors was determined using GP screen kit on PLP produced from UCB (open bars) and PB (closed bars). Data were compared to the levels in bPLT (hatched bars). Data are shown as mean with SD (n = 4).
Figure 5Differential interference microscopy. Representative images of the cell suspensions from (a) UCB or (b) PB after perfusion and double centrifugation. PLP are indicated by arrows. The larger cells were most likely MK (*). (c) Representative image of bPLT prepared in the same way as the PLP. Pictures were taken from DIC microscopy studies 1000× magnification.