| Literature DB >> 30899814 |
Sobhy M A Sallam1, Marwa F A Attia1, Adel N M Nour El-Din1, Samir Z El-Zarkouny1, Adel M Saber2, Hani M El-Zaiat1, Moustafa M Zeitoun1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of 10 weeks supplementation of Quebracho tannins (QT; 0 [control], 100 [QT100] or 200 g/[cow·d] [QT200]) to 30 multiparous postpartum buffalo cows (10 cows per group) on milk yield and composition, blood metabolites and reproductive performance. Supplementation of QT100 had no significant effect on milk yield, whereas QT200 decreased (P < 0.05) this trait. Compared with the control group, both QT levels decreased (P < 0.05) fat-corrected milk (FCM) yield, but no significant effects were found on percentages of milk fat and protein. Contrariwise, yields of milk fat, lactose and milk protein were decreased (P < 0.05) when QT200 was supplemented. The solids nonfat (SNF) percentage and yield were decreased (P < 0.05) with QT100 supplementation. Moreover, QT tended to numerically reduce total number of ovarian follicles, number of small follicles, peripheral progesterone concentration and conception rate. Supplementation of QT200 numerically increased number of large follicles, mean diameter of large follicle, number and diameters of corpora lutea. The inclusion of QT200 shortened days open (DO) and decreased number of services per conception. Contrariwise, QT did not show significant effects on serum total protein, albumin, globulin, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations. Supplementation of QT100 caused an increase (P < 0.05) of serum urea compared with that in control and QT200 groups. Generally, QT decreased (P < 0.05) serum creatinine concentration. Therefore, the supplementation of a commercial QT to early lactating Egyptian buffalo cows displayed negative consequences on their productive and reproductive performances.Entities:
Keywords: Blood metabolites; Buffalo; Conception rate; Milk traits; Ovarian follicles; Tannins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30899814 PMCID: PMC6407090 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental concentrate mixture and alfalfa hay fed to buffalo cows (g/kg, based on DM).1
| Item | Alfalfa hay | Concentrate mixture |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | ||
| Ground yellow corn | 450 | |
| Wheat bran | 270 | |
| Cotton seed meal | 250 | |
| Limestone | 18 | |
| Salt | 10 | |
| Minerals mixture | 2 | |
| Chemical composition | ||
| OM | 914 | 903 |
| CP | 197 | 178 |
| EE | 35 | 54 |
| NDF | 364 | 436 |
| ADF | 287 | 147 |
| Hemicellulose | 77 | 289 |
| RDP | 800 | 608 |
| RUP | 200 | 392 |
RDP = rumen degradable protein; RUP = rumen un-degradable protein.
Calculated according to Feedipedia.
Fig. 1Time schedule of ovulation synchronization, artificial insemination and pregnancy diagnosis. UD = ultrasound diagnosis; GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; PGF2α = prostaglandin F 2α; TAI = timed artificial insemination; QT = Quebracho tannins.
Effect of various levels of Quebracho tannins (QT) supplementation on milk yield, fat-corrected milk (FCM) yield and milk composition of buffalo cows at early lactation (mean ± SEM).
| Item | Control | QT100 | QT200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | T | W × T | ||||
| Milk yield, kg/d | 6.9 ± 0.13a | 6.6 ± 0.14a | 5.9 ± 0.16b | 0.1297 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| FCM yield, kg/d | 6.6 ± 0.15a | 6.0 ± 0.18b | 5.4 ± 0.19c | 0.6237 | 0.0001 | 0.3163 |
| Fat percentage, % | 6.16 ± 0.1335 | 5.93 ± 0.1547 | 6.08 ± 0.1481 | 0.5095 | 0.5230 | 0.0411 |
| Fat yield, kg/d | 425.04 ± 12.848a | 391.38 ± 14.68a | 358.72 ± 14.44b | 0.9415 | 0.0004 | 0.3123 |
| Protein percentage, % | 4.11 ± 0.1877 | 4.30 ± 0.2066 | 3.94 ± 0.21889 | 0.2725 | 0.4711 | 0.5502 |
| Protein yield, kg/d | 283.59 ± 14.076a | 283.8 ± 15.517a | 232.46 ± 16.50b | 0.3358 | 0.0233 | 0.1563 |
| SNF percentage, % | 9.50 ± 0.2019a | 8.13 ± 0.2207b | 9.54 ± 0.2355a | 0.0664 | 0.0001 | 0.0082 |
| SNF yield, kg/d | 657.6 ± 18.74a | 539.58 ± 20.50b | 562.14 ± 21.97b | 0.0068 | 0.0001 | 0.0008 |
| Lactose percentage, % | 4.97 ± 0.1061ab | 5.23 ± 0.1119a | 4.87 ± 0.1213b | 0.0004 | 0.0519 | 0.0165 |
| Lactose yield, kg/d | 342.22 ± 9.353a | 338.84 ± 9.951a | 285.98 ± 9.951b | 0.0173 | 0.0002 | 0.0001 |
| Density, % | 31.70 ± 0.3211ab | 32.43 ± 0.3722a | 31.36 ± 0.3745b | 0.0001 | 0.0690 | 0.0007 |
SNF = solid non-fat; W = time; T = treatment.
a, b, c Means in the same row with different superscripts significantly differ (P < 0.05).
Effect of various levels of Quebracho tannins (QT) supplementation on follicular dynamics and progesterone levels of buffalo cows at early lactation (means ± SEM).
| Item | Control | QT100 | QT200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| TNF | 13.44 ± 1.50 | 11.20 ± 1.43 | 12.22 ± 1.50 |
| NLF (≥5 mm) | 5.67 ± 0.65 | 5.90 ± 0.61 | 6.11 ± 0.65 |
| MDLF (3 to 5 mm) | 10.01 ± 0.41 | 9.71 ± 0.38 | 10.27 ± 0.41 |
| NSF (2 to 3 mm) | 7.78 ± 1.36 | 5.30 ± 1.29 | 6.11 ± 1.36 |
| NCL | 0.67 ± 0.17 | 0.50 ± 0.161 | 1.0 ± 0.17 |
| DCL, mm | 8.91 ± 2.47 | 8.11 ± 2.34 | 14.98 ± 2.47 |
| Progesterone, ng/mL | 1.46 ± 0.38 | 0.52 ± 0.45 | 1.30 ± 0.41 |
TNF = total number of follicles; NLF = number of large follicles; MDLF = mean diameter of large follicles; NSF = number of small follicles; NCL = number of corpora lutea; DCL = diameter of corpus luteum.
Effect of various levels of Quebracho tannins (QT) supplementation on reproductive performance of buffalo cows at early lactation.
| Item | Control | QT100 | QT200 | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days open, d | 121 | 121 | 114 | 4.67 |
| Number of services per conception | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.40 | 0.23 |
| Conception rate, % | 66.7 | 60.0 | 55.6 | – |
Effect of various levels of Quebracho tannins (QT) supplementation on blood metabolites of buffalo cows at early lactation (means ± SEM).
| Item | Control | QT100 | QT200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | T | W × T | ||||
| Total protein, g/dL | 8.21 ± 0.16 | 8.24 ± 0.14 | 7.92 ± 0.21 | 0.0148 | 0.4438 | 0.0008 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 3.79 ± 0.12 | 3.78 ± 0.11 | 3.66 ± 0.16 | 0.3293 | 0.7802 | 0.6082 |
| Globulin, g/dL | 4.41 ± 0.14 | 4.46 ± 0.12 | 4.50 ± 0.19 | 0.0404 | 0.8585 | 0.0394 |
| Urea, mg/dL | 27.94 ± 1.34b | 32.89 ± 1.15a | 25.07 ± 1.85b | 0.0521 | 0.0004 | 0.0100 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 3.07 ± 0.35a | 1.45 ± 0.34b | 2.47 ± 0.49ab | 0.8156 | 0.0039 | 0.4547 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 53.70 ± 1.61 | 53.55 ± 1.43 | 55.07 ± 2.00 | 0.0280 | 0.7834 | 0.5767 |
| Cholesterol, mg/dL | 9.36 ± 0.59 | 9.09 ± 0.52 | 10.84 ± 0.79 | 0.0031 | 0.1303 | 0.7015 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 17.16 ± 2.25 | 14.69 ± 1.91 | 20.30 ± 2.92 | 0.7382 | 0.2395 | 0.7000 |
W = time; T = treatment.
a, b Means in the same row with different superscripts significantly differ (P < 0.05).