Literature DB >> 30898753

Endoscopic Hematoma Evacuation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Under Local Anesthesia: Factors That Affect the Hematoma Removal Rate.

Toshiaki Hayashi1, Hiroshi Karibe2, Yosuke Akamatsu2, Ayumi Narisawa2, Takuhiro Shoji3, Tatsuya Sasaki3, Motonobu Kameyama2, Teiji Tominaga4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent advances in endoscopic surgery have led to more patients being able to undergo endoscopic removal of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). However, because of the minimal invasiveness, endoscopic HICH removal through a narrow surgical window can result in a low removal rate. The goal of the present study was to investigate the factors that affect the removal rate of HICH evacuation.
METHODS: The data from 28 patients with supratentorial HICH who had undergone endoscopic hematoma evacuation were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were spontaneous supratentorial HICH with a hematoma volume >30 mL, admission to the hospital within 24 hours of ictus, and a Glasgow coma scale score of ≥4.
RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, 9 were women and 19 were men, ranging in age from 41 to 86 years (mean, 60.7 ± 12.7). The hematoma location was the basal ganglia in 25 patients and subcortical in 3 patients. The mean preoperative hematoma volume was 62.4 ± 22.5 mL. The hematoma removal rate was <60% for 11 patients (poor evacuation group) and ≥60% for in 17 patients (good evacuation group). Comparing the 2 groups, chronic renal failure treated with hemodialysis (P = 0.0072, χ2 test), liver cirrhosis (P = 0.023, χ2 test), and surgeon experience with ≥10 cases of endoscopic HICH removal (P = 0.016, χ2 test) were significant factors related to the HICH removal rate.
CONCLUSION: To achieve a good removal rate, surgeons should have experience performing the endoscopic procedure. Also, patients with end-stage chronic renal failure or liver cirrhosis should be excluded.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic removal; Hemodialysis; Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; Liver cirrhosis; Removal rate

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30898753     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic hematoma removal of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia reduces operative time compared to craniotomy.

Authors:  Masahito Katsuki; Yukinari Kakizawa; Akihiro Nishikawa; Yasunaga Yamamoto; Toshiya Uchiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Where to make burr hole for endoscopic hematoma removal against intracerebral hemorrhage at the basal ganglia to increase the hematoma removal rate - Comparison between trans-forehead and along-the-long-axis approaches.

Authors:  Masahito Katsuki; Norio Narita; Kanako Sato; Ryuzaburo Kochi; Taketo Nishizawa; Kokoro Kawamura; Naoya Ishida; Ohmi Watanabe; Siqi Cai; Shinya Shimabukuro; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-02-03

3.  Significance of endoscopic hematoma evacuation in elderly patients with spontaneous putaminal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Naohide Fujita; Hideaki Ueno; Mitsuya Watanabe; Yasuaki Nakao; Takuji Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  Effect of Robot-Assisted Neuroendoscopic Hematoma Evacuation Combined Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Shiqiang Wu; Heping Wang; Junwen Wang; Feng Hu; Wei Jiang; Ting Lei; Kai Shu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Recent Updates in Neurosurgical Interventions for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Minimally Invasive Surgery to Improve Surgical Performance.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kobata; Naokado Ikeda
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.