| Literature DB >> 30897811 |
Kyunghun Min1, Baysok Jun2, Jaehyuck Lee3, Hong Kim4, Katsunori Furuya5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to better identify the information generated by citizens and to explore the regional social phenomenon whereby higher quality urban services focused on understanding regional issues are promoted. Citizens voluntarily and continuously communicate with local government both online and offline. We wanted to determine how civic information can be applied to urban planning. We selected Shiheung City, Republic of Korea, as our study area, as the city is formed of various types of land use: industrial areas, agricultural land, and residential areas. This area is facing developmental pressure with released development-restricted areas, and has been environmentally damaged by industrial complexes. We conducted a semantic network analysis of the top 10% most commonly used nouns in civil complaints to determine the keywords. Each thematic map we created was based on geographical information to explain the temporary, continuous, and chronic issues. The chronic problems were discussed in relation to the regional development process. The process of identifying and analyzing local issues by analyzing information voluntarily provided by citizens plays an important role in government-led urban management planning and policy formation and can contribute to decision making in the development of future urban policies.Entities:
Keywords: citizen information; civil complaints; issues mapping; keyword analysis; local issues
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30897811 PMCID: PMC6466073 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16061018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The location of the study area in the Republic of Korea.
Figure 2The land cover map of the study area.
Data composition based on reporting channel in Shiheung, Korea.
| Year | Daytime Phone Calls | Night-Time Phone Calls | Internet Bulletin Signboard | Smartphone Apps | Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 78 | 175 | 121 | 55 | 429 |
| 2015 | 31 | 111 | 175 | 121 | 438 |
| 2016 | 110 | 202 | 176 | 98 | 586 |
| sum | 219 | 488 | 472 | 274 | 1453 |
Figure 3Flowchart of our research.
The frequency and the centrality value of degree and betweenness of each word in 2014.
| No | Words | Frequency | Degree Centrality | Betweenness Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | noise | 344 | 0.6875 | 0.588889 |
| 2 | stink | 241 | 0.375 | 0.45 |
| 3 | construction | 141 | 0.3125 | 0.048611 |
| 4 | dawn | 106 | 0.3125 | 0.251389 |
| 5 | night-time | 95 | 0.25 | 0.177778 |
| 6 | holiday | 91 | 0.1875 | - |
| 7 | dust | 69 | 0.125 | - |
| 8 | music | 53 | 0.125 | - |
| 9 | site | 38 | 0.125 | - |
| 10 | sleep | 34 | 0.0625 | |
| 11 | factory | 31 | 0.0625 | - |
| 12 | window | 31 | 0.0625 | - |
| 13 | daily life | 29 | 0.0625 | - |
| 14 | livestock | 24 | 0.0625 | - |
| 15 | residents | 24 | 0.0625 | - |
| 16 | pain | 20 | 0.0625 | - |
| 17 | health | 20 | 0.0625 | - |
Figure 4The relationship between words in 2014.
The frequency and the centrality value of degree and betweenness of each word in 2015.
| No | Words | Frequency | Degree Centrality | Betweenness Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stink | 451 | 0.636364 | 0.81746 |
| 2 | noise | 241 | 0.181818 | 0.047619 |
| 3 | dawn | 152 | 0.181818 | 0.313853 |
| 4 | dust | 115 | 0.090909 | - |
| 5 | construction | 103 | 0.136364 | 0.041126 |
| 6 | add facility | 78 | 0.136364 | - |
| 7 | contaminant | 77 | 0.363636 | 0.306277 |
| 8 | nighttime | 71 | 0.045455 | - |
| 9 | sleep | 60 | 0.090909 | - |
| 10 | incineration | 52 | 0.181818 | 0.006854 |
| 11 | factory | 52 | 0.045455 | - |
| 12 | window | 50 | 0.045455 | - |
| 13 | fuel | 48 | 0.181818 | 0.006854 |
| 14 | weather | 48 | 0.045455 | - |
| 15 | pollution | 38 | 0.045455 | - |
| 16 | gas | 38 | 0.136364 | 0.031385 |
| 17 | chemicals | 34 | 0.045455 | - |
| 18 | parks | 32 | 0.045455 | - |
| 19 | air | 31 | 0.045455 | - |
| 20 | pain | 30 | 0.090909 | - |
| 21 | environment | 30 | 0.045455 | - |
| 22 | waste water | 26 | 0.045455 | - |
| 23 | maleficence | 21 | 0.045455 | - |
Figure 5The relationship between words in 2015.
The frequency and the centrality value of degree and betweenness of each word in 2016.
| No | Words | Frequency | Degree Centrality | Betweenness Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | noise | 728 | 0.809524 | 0.749546 |
| 2 | stink | 594 | 0.380952 | 0.20873 |
| 3 | construction | 255 | 0.238095 | 0.102041 |
| 4 | nighttime | 173 | 0.238095 | 0.028231 |
| 5 | dawn | 129 | 0.285714 | 0.08424 |
| 6 | dust | 126 | 0.095238 | - |
| 7 | factory | 120 | 0.095238 | 0.023469 |
| 8 | sleep | 115 | 0.142857 | - |
| 9 | residents | 114 | 0.142857 | 0.023469 |
| 10 | holiday | 83 | 0.142857 | - |
| 11 | inconvenience | 72 | 0.047619 | - |
| 12 | window | 68 | 0.142857 | 0.023469 |
| 13 | residence | 68 | 0.047619 | - |
| 14 | daily life | 51 | 0.047619 | - |
| 15 | chemicals | 42 | 0.047619 | - |
| 16 | door | 37 | 0.047619 | - |
| 17 | gas | 36 | 0.047619 | - |
| 18 | music | 30 | 0.047619 | - |
| 19 | church | 27 | 0.047619 | - |
| 20 | pain | 21 | 0.047619 | - |
| 21 | metal | 19 | 0.047619 | - |
Figure 6The relationship between words in 2016.
Figure 7The frequency of words that have been appearing for three years.
The frequency of all the words except for the words that have appeared for three years.
| No | Keywords | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | No | Keywords | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | residents | 24 | 0 | 114 | 15 | incineration | 0 | 52 | 0 |
| 2 | holiday | 69 | 0 | 83 | 16 | fuel | 0 | 48 | 0 |
| 3 | inconvenience | 0 | 0 | 72 | 17 | weather | 0 | 48 | 0 |
| 4 | residence | 0 | 0 | 68 | 18 | pollution | 0 | 38 | 0 |
| 5 | daily life | 31 | 0 | 51 | 19 | gas | 0 | 38 | 0 |
| 6 | chemicals | 0 | 34 | 42 | 20 | chemicals | 0 | 34 | 0 |
| 7 | site | 31 | 0 | 42 | 21 | parks | 0 | 32 | 0 |
| 8 | door | 0 | 0 | 37 | 22 | air | 0 | 31 | 0 |
| 9 | gas | 0 | 38 | 36 | 23 | environment | 0 | 30 | 0 |
| 10 | music | 29 | 0 | 30 | 24 | waste water | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| 11 | church | 0 | 0 | 27 | 25 | maleficence | 0 | 21 | 0 |
| 12 | metal | 0 | 0 | 19 | 26 | livestock | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | add facility | 0 | 78 | 0 | 27 | health | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | contaminant | 0 | 77 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
Monthly frequency of the noise complaints.
| Month | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2014 | 15 | 13 | 22 | 18 | 33 | 51 | 54 | 41 | 42 | 28 | 12 | 15 | 344 |
| 2015 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 35 | 41 | 37 | 31 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 241 |
| 2016 | 42 | 43 | 46 | 58 | 48 | 78 | 72 | 87 | 101 | 56 | 49 | 48 | 728 |
| Total | 64 | 71 | 79 | 90 | 98 | 164 | 167 | 165 | 174 | 96 | 72 | 73 | 1313 |
Figure 8Annually the noise distribution map.
Monthly frequency of stink complaints.
| Month | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2014 | 19 | 10 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 98 | 25 | 19 | 23 | 22 | 14 | 214 |
| 2015 | 27 | 129 | 19 | 27 | 31 | 27 | 25 | 63 | 34 | 34 | 18 | 14 | 451 |
| 2016 | 34 | 32 | 38 | 58 | 44 | 54 | 63 | 96 | 70 | 35 | 41 | 29 | 594 |
| Total | 80 | 171 | 74 | 99 | 88 | 108 | 126 | 184 | 123 | 92 | 81 | 60 | 1286 |
Figure 9Annually the stink distribution map.