Literature DB >> 3089745

Screening of colorectal cancer.

J P Bader.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a cancer in a disappointing location. However, its location clearly has an advantage that could theoretically permit efficient secondary prevention: the preceding of the cancer by a benign lesion, ie, the adenoma. Complete colonoscopy and its substitute, the double-contrast barium enema, and their specific limitations, must be reserved for high-risk patients: hereditary cancers and ulcerative colitis. For all the others, ie, adults of 45 years of age and with standard risks, the proposal is either to select the patients to be colonoscoped through occult blood testing of the stools or to perform a fiber sigmoidoscopy or a combination of both. Although imperfect, both methods allow the detection of polyps and cancers at a presymptomatic stage, when they are either benign or malignant, but localized and with a better prognosis. However, the absolute proof of the benefits of this strategy of screening would be the demonstration by controlled studies of a prolonged survival rate or a decrease in morbidity. Until now, this proof is not fully available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3089745     DOI: 10.1007/bf01295989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  3 in total

1.  Colonoscopic detection of early colorectal cancers. Impact of a surgical endoscopy service.

Authors:  W E Longo; G H Ballantyne; I M Modlin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Evaluation of a 'DIY' test for the detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J J Tate; J Northway; G T Royle; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 18.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.