| Literature DB >> 30897270 |
Yuki Hosokawa1, Shinji Higuchi1, Rie Kawakita1,2, Ikue Hata3, Tatsuhiko Urakami4, Tsuyoshi Isojima5, Kei Takasawa6, Yohei Matsubara6, Haruo Mizuno7, Yoshihiro Maruo8, Katsuyuki Matsui8, Katsuya Aizu9, Kazuhiko Jinno10, Shunsuke Araki11, Yasuko Fujisawa12, Koji Osugi13, Chikako Tono14, Yasuhiro Takeshima15, Tohru Yorifuji1,2.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: Glucokinase; Maturity-onset diabetes of the young; Pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30897270 PMCID: PMC6825925 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Pregnancy outcome of offspring born to affected or unaffected mothers
| Affected motherAffected offspring | Affected motherUnaffected offspring | Affected fatherAffected offspring |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Sex (male/female) | 13/15 | 9/3 | 8/5 | 0.227 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38.4 ± 2.3 | 39.3 ± 1.0 | 39.2 ± 0.9 | 0.45 |
| Birthweight (g) | 2713 ± 551 | 3403 ± 559 | 2838 ± 306 | 0.003 |
| Birthweight centiles | 40.6 ± 30.5 | 74.9 ± 26.7 | 37.2 ± 25.8 | 0.003 |
| Macrosomia > 4,000 g | 0 (0%) | 2 (16%) | 0(0%) | |
| Insulin treatment during pregnancy | 9 (32.1%) | 4 (33.3%) |
For gestational age, birthweight and birthweight centiles, the mean ± standard deviations are shown *Pearson's χ2‐test. **Kruskal–Wallis test. ***Kruskal–Wallis test with post‐tests. P = 0.002 group 1 versus group 2, P = 0.031 group 2 versus group 3. ****Kruskal–Wallis test with post tests. P = 0.005 group 1 versus group 2, P = 0.009 group 2 versus group 3. Fathers were affected in the unaffected mothers group.
Figure 1Birthweight differences between groups with different glucokinase mutation status. Means and standard deviations are shown.
Pregnancy outcome of offspring born to affected women according to the treatment status
| Affected offspring |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin | Diet | ||
|
|
| ||
| Gestational age (weeks) | 37.6 | 38.8 | 0.308 |
| Birthweight (g) | 2532 ± 758 | 2800 ± 420 | 0.595 |
| Birthweight centiles | 39.5 ± 31.3 | 41.1 ± 31.0 | 0.885 |
For birthweight and birthweight centiles, the mean ± standard deviations are shown. *Mann–Whitney U‐test.
Figure 2Birthweight centiles according to the offspring's affection status and the method of treatment during pregnancy. The centiles were corrected for sex, gestational age and birth order of each offspring. Means and standard deviations are shown.