| Literature DB >> 30897170 |
Jessica Mendes Nadal1, Guilherme Dos Anjos Camargo1, Andressa Novatski2,3, William Roger Macenhan2, Daniele Toniolo Dias4, Fernanda Malaquias Barboza1, Amanda Lyra1, João Ricardo Roik3, Josiane Padilha de Paula1, Aloisi Somer3, Paulo Vitor Farago1,2.
Abstract
Adapalene (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30897170 PMCID: PMC6428289 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Chemical structure of adapalene (ADAP).
Composition of adapalene-loaded PCL microparticles.
| F0 | F10 | F20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polysorbate 80 (g) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| PVA (g) | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Purified water (mL) | 200.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 |
| Adapalene (ADAP) (g) | — | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| PCL (g) | 2.00 | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Methylene chloride (mL) | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Fig 2Schematic setup of photoacoustic spectroscopy.
The radiation font, the mechanical modulator, monochromator, filters, lens, microphone as the detector, and a personal computer for data acquisition.
Water content, adapalene-loaded, encapsulation efficiency (EE), particle size and span for PCL microparticles.
| Microparticles | Water content (%) | Adapalene-loaded | EE (%) | Mean diameter (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | 3.06 ± 0.09 | — | — | 8 ± 4 | 0.89 |
| F10 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 100 ± 2 | 100.44 | 8 ± 3 | 1.25 |
| F20 | 2.91 ± 0.04 | 199 ± 2 | 99.37 | 7 ± 3 | 1.02 |
1means (n = 3) ± standard deviation
2means (n = 3)
Fig 3Scanning electron micrographs of PCL microparticles: F0 (a), F10 (b) and F20 (c). Magnifications of 2000X presenting a spherical shape and smooth, slightly flaky surface.
Fig 4FTIR results of ADAP, PCL, PM, and PCL microparticles (F0, F10, and F20).
PM presented bands at 1140, 1300, 1477, 1688, 2847, and 2903 cm-1 that are related to ADAP; bands at 961, 1728 and 2949 cm-1 that are attributed to PCL. The F10 and F20 do not present any shifts on these bands. In this case, the encapsulation process does not induce chemical interaction between the drug and PCL.
Fig 5DSC curves of ADAP, PCL, PM, and PCL microparticles (F0, F10, and F20).
The formulations F10 and F20 do not present the melting point of ADAP at 326°C, showing a complete drug amorphization.
Fig 6Experimental data of frequency scan by OPC technique for the Strat-M membrane with a thickness of 310±10 μm.
The solid line represents the best data fit by Eq (2).
Fig 7(a) PAS result for the Strat-M membrane. We can notice a redshift with decreasing depth, indicating the difference of the polymeric layers from the membrane. (b) FEG-SEM image of the membrane with 200x of magnification. The arrows illustrate the thermal diffusion length (μmembrane) obtained for frequencies of 5, 23, 51, and 203 Hz, and the colors are the same as the respective spectrum from (a).
Fig 8Photoacoustic spectra of formulations.
ADAP and ADAP-loaded PCL microparticles. The Gaussian curves are centered at 272, 336, and 369 nm. The bands at 336 and 369 nm decrease in intensity for F10 and F20, indicating the enclosure of the drug molecules into polymeric microparticles.
Fig 9Photoacoustic spectra for the membranes after 15 min of application formulations (Formulation+Strat-M).
Excitation in the internal side of the membrane with a 203 Hz modulation frequency (33 μm depth). The figure indicates the position of the peaks attributed to ADAP (250–269, 336 and 370–380 nm) and Strat-M (280, 300–350 nm).
Fig 10Evolution of ADAP permeation in the membrane as a function of thermal diffusion length after 15 min (a) and 3 h (b) of application obtained by the sum of the areas under the Gaussian curves related to ADAP (250–269, 336, and 370–380 nm). The hatched marks are approximately the positions where the formulations were applied. After 15 min, the highest drug concentration remains at approximately 210 μm for all formulations. After 3h, for ADAP and PM formulation, the drug permeates through all layers of the membrane until 33 μm. The F10 and F20 concentrate ADAP in 100 μm of penetration depth.