Literature DB >> 30897155

Correction: Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models.

Scott A Dee, Fernando V Bauermann, Megan C Niederwerder, Aaron Singrey, Travis Clement, Marcelo de Lima, Craig Long, Gilbert Patterson, Maureen A Sheahan, Ana M M Stoian, Vlad Petrovan, Cassandra K Jones, Jon De Jong, Ju Ji, Gordon D Spronk, Luke Minion, Jane Christopher-Hennings, Jeff J Zimmerman, Raymond R R Rowland, Eric Nelson, Paul Sundberg, Diego G Diel.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194509.].

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30897155      PMCID: PMC6428285          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Due to new calculations, there are revisions to the Results section under the sub-heading “Half-life estimates.” Please see the corrected text here: To determine the rate of decay of virus in feed, half-life estimates were calculated for five pathogens: SVA, PSV, FCV, BHV-1 and ASFV using end point titers determined on Batch 4 samples (Table 4). Overall, half-life appeared to be influenced by virus and ingredient type, with FCV and SVA displaying extended half-lives in samples of conventional soybean meal, 44.4 days and 22.3 days, respectively. SVA appeared to be the most stable virus in feed, with half-lives ranging from 3.9 to 22.3 days across the 10 ingredients in which it survived. Remarkably, FCV presented the longest half-life of all viruses in conventional soybean meal (44.6 days), but its half-life was much shorter (4.3 to 7.9 days) in the other three ingredients that contained viable virus. In contrast, PSV (5.1 to 8.6 days), ASFV (4.1 to 5.1 days) and BHV-1 (4.4 days) displayed shorter, but relatively consistent half-lives across the ingredients in which they survived. Interestingly, the half-life of the ASFV stock virus (4.7 days), was similar to that of virus in the presence of feed matrices.
Table 4

An overview of viability across all viruses tested in the study, including PEDV [14] highlighting half-life estimates (in days) of viruses presenting measurable endpoint titers across ingredients on Batch 4 samples.

INGREDIENTSVAASFVPSVPEDVFCVPCV2PRRSVBHV-1
SBM-Conventional22.3*4.6*6.2*44.5*+4.4*
SBM-Organic4.7*6.2*
Soy oil cake7.4*5.0*7.2*4.4*
DDGS14.8*+
Lysine5.9*6.6*+
Choline5.1*+
Vitamin D3.9*7.7*+
Moist cat food14.9*4.6*6.7*
Moist dog food8.9*4.2*8.6*
Dry dog food6.4*4.1*6.6*
Pork sausage casings12.7*4.4*5.1*7.9*
Complete feed (+ control)8.9*4.3*6.2*4.3*+
Complete feed (- control)
Stock virus control4.7*

Note: All ingredients tested for IAV-S, BVDV, CDV, VSV were negative by both VI and bioassay.

* = Endpoint titer T ½estimate (in days) expressed in units of TCID50

• = Negative by both VI and bioassay

+ = Negative by VI and positive by bioassay

Light grey shading = While viable PEDV was recovered from these samples, viral titers were expressed in units of FFU, not TCID50 Dark grey shading = Feed ingredients not included in this study

As a result of the new calculations, there are updates to Table 4. Please see the corrected Table 4 here. Note: All ingredients tested for IAV-S, BVDV, CDV, VSV were negative by both VI and bioassay. * = Endpoint titer T ½estimate (in days) expressed in units of TCID50 • = Negative by both VI and bioassay + = Negative by VI and positive by bioassay Light grey shading = While viable PEDV was recovered from these samples, viral titers were expressed in units of FFU, not TCID50 Dark grey shading = Feed ingredients not included in this study
  5 in total

Review 1.  The risk of viral transmission in feed: What do we know, what do we do?

Authors:  Scott A Dee; Megan C Niederwerder; Gil Patterson; Roger Cochrane; Cassie Jones; Diego Diel; Egan Brockhoff; Eric Nelson; Gordon Spronk; Paul Sundberg
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  The Addition of Nature Identical Flavorings Accelerated the Virucidal Effect of Pure Benzoic Acid against African Swine Fever Viral Contamination of Complete Feed.

Authors:  Hengxiao Zhai; Chihai Ji; Maria Carol Walsh; Jon Bergstrom; Sebastien Potot; Heng Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Peptide OPTX-1 From Ornithodoros papillipes Tick Inhibits the pS273R Protease of African Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Jingjing Wang; Mengyao Ji; Bingqian Yuan; Anna Luo; Zhenyuan Jiang; Tengyu Zhu; Yang Liu; Peter Muiruri Kamau; Lin Jin; Ren Lai
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Half-Life of African Swine Fever Virus in Shipped Feed.

Authors:  Ana M M Stoian; Jeff Zimmerman; Ju Ji; Trevor J Hefley; Scott Dee; Diego G Diel; Raymond R R Rowland; Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  Disinfection to control African swine fever virus: a UK perspective.

Authors:  Andrew D Wales; Robert H Davies
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.472

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.