| Literature DB >> 30897129 |
Dev Ram Sunuwar1, Raj Kumar Sangroula2, Nani Shova Shakya3, Renu Yadav3, Narendra Kumar Chaudhary4, Pranil Man Singh Pradhan5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anemia during pregnancy is a major public health problem globally with multiple causes including inadequate dietary intakes. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of nutrition education on nutritional knowledge, hemoglobin level and dietary intake of anemic pregnant women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30897129 PMCID: PMC6428266 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Conceptual framework of the study.
Fig 2Flow diagram of the study.
Socio-demographic information of pregnant women.
| 26.06±4.98 | 26.23±4.74 | 0.856 | ||
| 21.44±4.65 | 21.08±4.87 | 0.692 | ||
| 29.93±4.58 | 28.89±4.47 | 0.234 | ||
| Primigravida | 1.57±0.79 | 1.74±0.93 | 0.16 | |
| Multigravida | 1.15±0.61 | 1.07±0.26 | 0.158 | |
| 15–19 | 3(5.6) | 2(3.8) | 0.595 | |
| 20–29 | 41(75.9) | 39(73.6) | ||
| 30–40 | 10(18.5) | 12(22.6) | ||
| No education | 4(7.4) | 1(1.9) | 0.662 | |
| Literate only | 1(1.9) | 6(11.3) | ||
| Primary (1–5) | 2(3.7) | 2(3.8) | ||
| Secondary (6–9) | 13(24.1) | 10(18.9) | ||
| SLC & above | 34(63.0) | 34(64.2) | ||
| Hindu | 42(77.8) | 42(79.2) | 0.506 | |
| Buddhist | 6(11.1) | 8(15.1) | ||
| Others | 6(11.2) | 3(5.7) | ||
| House wife | 27(50.0) | 32(60.4) | 0.621 | |
| Employee | 12(22.2) | 12(22.6) | ||
| Trader | 8(14.8) | 6(11.3) | ||
| Unemployed | 2(3.7) | - | ||
| Others | 5(9.3 | 3(5.7) | ||
Comparison of primary outcome variables for base line and end line in control and intervention groups.
| Variables | Control group(n = 54) | Intervention group(n = 53) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Baseline | 10.18 | 9.99 | 0.209 |
| End line | 10.35 | 10.55 | 0.144 |
| Change | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.002 |
Independent sample t-test
*statistically significant is at p<0.05
Comparison of secondary outcomes variables for base line and end line in control and intervention groups.
| Variables | Control group(n = 54) | Intervention group(n = 53) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | p value | |
| Baseline | 10.31 | 9.24±4.67 | 0.200 |
| End line | 11.37 | 17.37±3.25 | <0.001 |
| Change | 1.05±6.59 | 8.26±4.57 | <0.001 |
Independent sample t-test
*statistically significant is at p<0.05
Comparison of secondary outcomes variables for base line and end line in control and intervention groups.
| Variables | Control group(n = 54) | Intervention group(n = 53) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Baseline | 54.87 ±8.81 | 52.68 ±7.43 | 0.167 |
| End line | 56.59 ±8.25 | 56.01 ±7.14 | 0.702 |
| Change | 1.79 ±9.84 | 3.28 ±8.31 | 0.401 |
| 154.11±5.11 | 153.47±5.77 | 0.541 | |
| Baseline | 22.87 ±3.86 | 22.18 ±3.15 | 0.322 |
| End line | 23.83 ±3.27 | 23.77 ±2.62 | 0.921 |
| Change | 0.95 ±4.92 | 1.58 ±2.80 | 0.419 |
Independent sample t-test
BMI = Body mass index (kg/m2)
*statistically significant is at p<0.05.
Comparison of dietary intake of selected food items between control and intervention groups using seven days food frequency questionnaire.
| Variables | Control group(n = 54) | Intervention group(n = 53) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Food groups | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | p value |
| Base line | 1.90 | 1.93 | 0.927 |
| End line | 1.93 | 3.88 | 0.001 |
| Change | 0.03 | 2.23 | <0.001 |
| Base line | 4.35 | 4.20 | 0.729 |
| End line | 4.20 | 5.42 | 0.005 |
| Change | 0.04 | 1.41 | 0.006 |
| Base line | 4.17 | 4.04 | 0.800 |
| End line | 4.32 | 4.72 | 0.369 |
| Change | 0.21 | 0.78 | 0.314 |
| Base line | 4.67 | 4.55 | 0.827 |
| End line | 4.92 | 6.55 | <0.001 |
| Change | 0.26 | 2.04 | 0.013 |
| Base line | 6.98 | 6.81 | 0.219 |
| End line | 6.87 | 7.04 | 0.315 |
| Change | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.161 |
| Base line | 4.71 | 3.28 | 0.016 |
| End line | 4.02 | 4.84 | 0.097 |
| Change | 0.37 | 1.89 | 0.016 |
| Base line | 3.10 | 2.60 | 0.302 |
| End line | 3.21 | 3.57 | 0.384 |
| Change | 0.09 | 1.05 | 0.070 |
| Base line | 6.08 | 5.37 | 0.063 |
| End line | 5.80 | 6.55 | 0.008 |
| Change | 0.20 | 1.11 | 0.006 |
Independent sample t-test
* Statistical significance is at p<0.05