Literature DB >> 30897035

Memories Fade: The Relationship Between Memory Vividness and Remembered Visual Salience.

Rose A Cooper1, Elizabeth A Kensinger1, Maureen Ritchey1.   

Abstract

Past events, particularly emotional experiences, are often vividly recollected. However, it remains unclear how qualitative information, such as low-level visual salience, is reconstructed and how the precision and bias of this information relate to subjective memory vividness. Here, we tested whether remembered visual salience contributes to vivid recollection. In three experiments, participants studied emotionally negative and neutral images that varied in luminance and color saturation, and they reconstructed the visual salience of each image in a subsequent test. Results revealed, unexpectedly, that memories were recollected as less visually salient than they were encoded, demonstrating a novel memory-fading effect, whereas negative emotion increased subjective memory vividness and the precision with which visual features were encoded. Finally, memory vividness tracked both the precision and remembered salience (bias) of visual information. These findings provide evidence that low-level visual information fades in memory and contributes to the experience of vivid recollection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emotion; episodic memory; memory precision; open data; preregistered; recollection; visual salience

Year:  2019        PMID: 30897035      PMCID: PMC6512158          DOI: 10.1177/0956797619836093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  35 in total

1.  How emotion enhances the feeling of remembering.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Mauricio R Delgado; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Episodic memory: from mind to brain.

Authors:  Endel Tulving
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Saliency on a natural scene background: effects of color and luminance contrast add linearly.

Authors:  Sonja Engmann; Bernard M 't Hart; Thomas Sieren; Selim Onat; Peter König; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Distributed Patterns of Reactivation Predict Vividness of Recollection.

Authors:  Marie St-Laurent; Hervé Abdi; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mood-dependent retrieval in visual long-term memory: dissociable effects on retrieval probability and mnemonic precision.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2017-06-18

6.  Decomposing Parietal Memory Reactivation to Predict Consequences of Remembering.

Authors:  Hongmi Lee; Rosalie Samide; Franziska R Richter; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; Jonathan Gill; Aude Oliva; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-29

Review 8.  NEVER forget: negative emotional valence enhances recapitulation.

Authors:  Holly J Bowen; Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

Review 9.  Source monitoring and memory distortion.

Authors:  M K Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Multimodal Feature Integration in the Angular Gyrus during Episodic and Semantic Retrieval.

Authors:  Heidi M Bonnici; Franziska R Richter; Yasemin Yazar; Jon S Simons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Post-Encoding Amygdala-Visuosensory Coupling Is Associated with Negative Memory Bias in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Patterns of episodic content and specificity predicting subjective memory vividness.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper; Maureen Ritchey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 3.  I remember it like it was yesterday: Age-related differences in the subjective experience of remembering.

Authors:  Adrien Folville; Jon S Simons; Arnaud D'Argembeau; Christine Bastin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory.

Authors:  Shijia Zhang; Jianhong Zheng; Lei Mo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-24

Review 5.  The power of negative and positive episodic memories.

Authors:  Samantha E Williams; Jaclyn H Ford; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Feature-specific reaction times reveal a semanticisation of memories over time and with repeated remembering.

Authors:  Julia Lifanov; Juan Linde-Domingo; Maria Wimber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Vividness of visual imagery questionnaire scores and their relationship to visual short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Younes Adam Tabi; Maria Raquel Maio; Bahaaeddin Attaallah; Shannon Dickson; Daniel Drew; Mohamad Imran Idris; Annika Kienast; Verena Klar; Lisa Nobis; Olivia Plant; Youssuf Saleh; Timothy Ravinder Sandhu; Ellie Slavkova; Sofia Toniolo; Nahid Zokaei; Sanjay G Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Long-term memory interference is resolved via repulsion and precision along diagnostic memory dimensions.

Authors:  Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05

9.  The role of memory ability, depth and mode of recall in the impact of memory on later consumption.

Authors:  Joanna Szypula; Amy Ahern; Lucy Cheke
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Depressive symptoms and social context modulate oxytocin's effect on negative memory recall.

Authors:  Shiu F Wong; Christopher Cardoso; Mark A Orlando; Christopher A Brown; Mark A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.