Literature DB >> 30897030

Validity and reliability of a low-cost dynamometer to assess maximal isometric strength of upper limb.

Natalia Romero-Franco1, Juan C Fernández-Domínguez1, Juan A Montaño-Munuera2, Javier Romero-Franco3, Pedro Jiménez-Reyes4.   

Abstract

Muscle imbalance and deficit are key parameters for guiding rehabilitation and sports sessions and avoiding injuries. However, the high cost and non-portable nature of most instruments employed for muscle strength assessment frequently hamper an affordable evaluation in field conditions. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of a low-cost digital dynamometer to assess the maximal isometric strength of upper limb muscles. Fourteen physically active volunteers performed the main movements of the upper limb at maximal isometric strength: flexion-extension, internal-external rotation and abduction-adduction of the shoulder; and flexion-extension of both elbow and wrist. Validity was examined by comparing the strength values from the low-cost digital dynamometer and those measured by an isokinetic dynamometer, assumed as the gold standard. The correlation between both devices was perfect (r > 0.913), while Bland-Altman plots showed absolute agreement between both devices, the maximum range of the values of bias was -0.99-1.00 N in wrist extension. Inter-tester and intra-tester reliability were excellent for all movements (ICC ≥ 0.855). The low-cost digital dynamometer showed strong validity and excellent reliability in assessing maximal isometric strength during the main movements of the upper limb. Professionals may use it for an affordable isometric muscle strength assessment in field situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; dynamometry; maximal isometric strength; upper limb; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30897030     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1594570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  Isometric strength of upper limb muscles in youth using hand-held and hand-grip dynamometry.

Authors:  Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo; Arturo Ruiz-Gutierrez; Sebastian Salas-Villar; Eduardo Guzman-Muñoz; Sergio Sazo-Rodriguez; Eric Urbina-Santibáñez
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Reliability and difference in neck extensor muscles strength measured by a portable dynamometer in individuals with and without chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Francis Grondin; David Colman; Nicolas Peyrot; Olivier Maillard; Sébastien Freppel; Teddy Caderby; Yannick Perdrix
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  An Empirical and Subjective Model of Upper Extremity Fatigue Under Hypogravity.

Authors:  Tatiana Volkova; Claude Nicollier; Volker Gass
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Validity and Reliability of The Smart Groin Trainer for Measuring Hip Adduction Strength.

Authors:  António Carlos Sousa; Diogo Luís Marques; António Manuel Calado; Carlos Pacheco; Daniel Almeida Marinho; Mário Cardoso Marques; Bruno Filipe Travassos
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.923

5.  Validity and reliability of the DiCI for the measurement of shoulder flexion and abduction strength in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Javier González-Rosalén; Alba Cuerda-Del Pino; Mariana Sánchez-Barbadora; Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of a Novel Push Low-Cost Hand-Held Dynamometer for Knee Strength Assessment during Different Force Ranges.

Authors:  Maria de Cássia Macedo; Matheus Almeida Souza; Kariny Realino Ferreira; Laura Oliveira Campos; Igor Sérgio Oliveira Souza; Michelle Almeida Barbosa; Ciro José Brito; Leonardo Intelangelo; Alexandre Carvalho Barbosa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.