Literature DB >> 30896232

Helping behavior in rats (Rattus norvegicus) when an escape alternative is present.

Joana Carvalheiro1, Ana Seara-Cardoso1, Ana Raquel Mesquita1, Liliana de Sousa2, Pedro Oliveira2, Teresa Summavielle3, Ana Magalhães3.   

Abstract

Prosocial behavior in rats is known to occur in response to a familiar rat's distress, but the motivations underlying prosocial behavior remain elusive. In this study, we adapted the experimental setting of Ben-Ami Bartal, Decety, and Mason (2011) to explore different motivations behind helping behavior in adolescent rats. In the original setting, a free rat is placed in an arena where a cagemate is trapped inside a restrainer that can only be opened from the outside by the free rat. Here we added a dark compartment to the experimental setting that allowed the free rat to escape the arena and the distress evoked by the trapped cagemate, based on rodents' aversion to bright areas. As a control, we tested rats in the same arena but with the door to the dark area closed. Our results showed that all free rats, except one in the escape condition, learned to open the restrainer's door. However, in the escape condition, rats took significantly longer to open the restrainer to the cagemates when compared with rats that could not escape. To further explore the motivations underlying these group differences in door-opening latencies, we measured both rats' behavior. We found that struggling behavior (i.e., distress) in the trapped rat did not affect door-opening, whereas exploratory behavior (i.e., proactive/positive behavior) in both rats contributed to shorter times. Our results highlight that adolescent rats show prosocial behavior even when they can escape without helping and contribute to demonstrate the role of positive emotional states in prosocial behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896232     DOI: 10.1037/com0000178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  5 in total

1.  An opinion on the interpretation of social release in rats.

Authors:  M H Blystad
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Caring animals and care ethics.

Authors:  Birte Wrage
Journal:  Biol Philos       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.795

3.  No preference for prosocial helping behavior in rats with concurrent social interaction opportunities.

Authors:  Kelsey A Heslin; Michael F Brown
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Current rodent models for the study of empathic processes.

Authors:  Stewart S Cox; Carmela M Reichel
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.277

5.  The bystander effect in rats.

Authors:  John L Havlik; Yuri Y Vieira Sugano; Maura Clement Jacobi; Rahul R Kukreja; John H Clement Jacobi; Peggy Mason
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.