Literature DB >> 30896207

Use of linguistic distancing and cognitive reappraisal strategies during emotion regulation in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Erik C Nook1, Constanza M Vidal Bustamante1, Hyun Young Cho1, Leah H Somerville1.   

Abstract

Regulating one's emotions is an important psychological skill at all ages. Cognitive reappraisal-changing the meaning of a stimulus to alter its emotional impact-is an effective emotion regulation technique. Prior work shows that adults spontaneously reduce their use of present tense verbs and first-person singular pronouns (e.g., I, me, mine) when engaging in cognitive reappraisal, a linguistic shift that is thought to track increased psychological distance. Here, we investigated whether such linguistic distancing during emotion regulation varied across age. Participants aged 10 to 23 (N = 112) spoke aloud their thoughts and feelings while completing a classic cognitive reappraisal task. Participants' verbal responses were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for linguistic distancing, compliance with reappraisal instructions, and use of 8 different reappraisal strategies identified by prior researchers. Results replicated prior work in a developmental sample: Reappraisal decreased negative affect and increased linguistic distancing, and stronger linguistic distancing during reappraisal was associated with more successful emotion regulation. Contrary to hypotheses, we found no age differences in linguistic distancing or reappraisal success, even after excluding trials on which participants did not comply with reappraisal instructions. However, reappraisal strategy use varied across age. Use of the changing circumstances and separating oneself (i.e., distancing) strategies increased across age whereas changing consequences use decreased across age. Additionally, in adolescence, challenging reality use was elevated and problem-solving use was reduced compared to other ages. Results suggest that linguistic distancing during emotion regulation is stable from age 10 to 23 but use of cognitive reappraisal strategies differs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896207     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic interactive theory as a domain-general account of social perception.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Ryan M Stolier; Jeffrey A Brooks
Journal:  Adv Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 2.  Emotion Regulation Strategies as Risk Factors for Developmental Psychopathology: a Meta-analytic Review of Longitudinal Studies based on Cross-lagged Correlations and Panel Models.

Authors:  Marco Cavicchioli; Valentina Tobia; Anna Ogliari
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2022-10-08

3.  A Case for Translation From the Clinic to the Laboratory.

Authors:  M Alexandra Kredlow; Lycia D de Voogd; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 4.  Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report.

Authors:  Marc P Bennett; Rachel Knight; Shivam Patel; Tierney So; Darren Dunning; Thorsten Barnhofer; Patrick Smith; Willem Kuyken; Tamsin Ford; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating an intervention to boost decentering in response to distressing mental experiences during adolescence: the decentering in adolescence study (DECADES).

Authors:  Marc P Bennett; Rachel Clare Knight; Darren Dunning; Alan Archer-Boyd; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Edwin Dalmaijer; Tamsin Ford; J Mark G Williams; Hannah Clegg; Willem Kuyken; Tierney So; Gemma Wright; Bert Lenaert; Maris Vainre; Peter Watson; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The relationship between risk perception of COVID-19 and willingness to help: A moderated mediation model.

Authors:  Yadi Zeng; Gensen Xiao; Baojuan Ye; Yanzhen Zhang; Mingfan Liu; Xinqiang Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2022-04-06

7.  Linguistic measures of psychological distance track symptom levels and treatment outcomes in a large set of psychotherapy transcripts.

Authors:  Erik C Nook; Thomas D Hull; Matthew K Nock; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Emotion Naming Impedes Both Cognitive Reappraisal and Mindful Acceptance Strategies of Emotion Regulation.

Authors:  Erik C Nook; Ajay B Satpute; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2021-04-20

9.  Fear From Afar, Not So Risky After All: Distancing Moderates the Relationship Between Fear and Risk Taking.

Authors:  Lewend Mayiwar; Fredrik Björklund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.