Saori Kashima1, Kazuo Inoue2, Masatoshi Matsumoto3, Kimihiko Akimoto4. 1. Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University , Minami-ku, Hiroshima Japan. 2. Department of Community Medicine, Chiba Medical Center, Teikyo University School of Medicine , Ichihara, Chiba , Japan. 3. Department of Community Based Medical System, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University , Minami-ku, Hiroshima , Japan. 4. Akimoto Occupational Health Consultant Office , Tokyo Japan.
Abstract
Aim: White blood cell (WBC) count or C-reactive protein (CRP) level alone may not fully indicate the chronic inflammation causing type 2 diabetes. We examined both WBC count and CRP level, independently and in combination, as predictive markers for type 2 diabetes and also considered the influence of obesity and other individual characteristics on the relationship. Materials and Methods: In total, 9,706 participants were enrolled with WBC < 10*109/L and CRP < 10 mg/L using data from the Yuport Medical Checkup Center Study. The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes [defined either as known diabetes, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (47.5 mmol/mol)] was measured. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: During study period, 272 men (5.5%) and 113 women (2.4%) progressed to diabetes. The progression to diabetes was predicted by both increased baseline levels of WBC count [adjusted HR = 1.29 (95% CI: 1.04-1.60)] and CRP level [1.39 (1.10-1.74)], even after adjusting for possible confounders. The combined presence was more predictive of diabetes than either alone in a four-groups analysis [1.75 (1.28-2.40)]. In addition, the elevated HRs of either or both higher WBC and CRP levels were observed across four subgroups of body mass index (BMI), including low BMI, and people who had at least one occurrence of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Increased WBC counts and CRP levels were predictive for type 2 diabetes and the combination augmented the risk of diabetes, regardless of whether the BMI was high or low.
Aim: White blood cell (WBC) count or C-reactive protein (CRP) level alone may not fully indicate the chronic inflammation causing type 2 diabetes. We examined both WBC count and CRP level, independently and in combination, as predictive markers for type 2 diabetes and also considered the influence of obesity and other individual characteristics on the relationship. Materials and Methods: In total, 9,706 participants were enrolled with WBC < 10*109/L and CRP < 10 mg/L using data from the Yuport Medical Checkup Center Study. The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes [defined either as known diabetes, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (47.5 mmol/mol)] was measured. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: During study period, 272 men (5.5%) and 113 women (2.4%) progressed to diabetes. The progression to diabetes was predicted by both increased baseline levels of WBC count [adjusted HR = 1.29 (95% CI: 1.04-1.60)] and CRP level [1.39 (1.10-1.74)], even after adjusting for possible confounders. The combined presence was more predictive of diabetes than either alone in a four-groups analysis [1.75 (1.28-2.40)]. In addition, the elevated HRs of either or both higher WBC and CRP levels were observed across four subgroups of body mass index (BMI), including low BMI, and people who had at least one occurrence of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Increased WBC counts and CRP levels were predictive for type 2 diabetes and the combination augmented the risk of diabetes, regardless of whether the BMI was high or low.
Entities:
Keywords:
C-reactive protein; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; body mass index; chronic inflammation; white blood cell count
Authors: Cristina Menni; Panayiotis Louca; Sarah E Berry; Amrita Vijay; Stuart Astbury; Emily R Leeming; Rachel Gibson; Francesco Asnicar; Gianmarco Piccinno; Jonathan Wolf; Richard Davies; Massimo Mangino; Nicola Segata; Tim D Spector; Ana M Valdes Journal: BMC Med Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 8.775