| Literature DB >> 30895529 |
Miyu Sueyoshi1, Masaki Fukunaga1, Mizue Mei1, Atsushi Nakajima2, Gaku Tanaka2, Takayo Murase2, Yuki Narita1,3, Sumio Hirata1,3, Daisuke Kadowaki4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Constipation is frequently observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Lactulose is expected to improve the intestinal environment by stimulating bowel movements as a disaccharide laxative and prebiotic. We studied the effect of lactulose on renal function in adenine-induced CKD rats and monitored uremic toxins and gut microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: CKD; Gut microbiota; Lactulose; Renal function; Uremic toxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30895529 PMCID: PMC6555783 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-019-01727-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol ISSN: 1342-1751 Impact factor: 2.801
Fig. 1Experimental design
Fig. 2Effects of lactulose on body weight and food consumption of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Changes of body weight (a) and food consumption (b) during adenine feeding and normal or lactulose feeding period in adenine-induced CKD rats. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group
Effects of lactulose on hematology and serum chemistry findings of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats at week 4
| Normal | CKD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 3.0 Lac | 7.5 Lac | ||
| RBC (104/µL) | 907.8 ± 31.0 | 551.8 ± 78.9** | 617.2 ± 57.7**, # | 661.5 ± 47.7**, ## |
| WBC (102/µL) | 107.4 ± 18.6 | 119.4 ± 21.3 | 166.8 ± 38.8**, ## | 171.3 ± 17.7**, ## |
| HGB (g/dL) | 16.0 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 1.4** | 10.9 ± 1.0** | 11.8 ± 0.9**, ## |
| HCT (%) | 45.8 ± 0.7 | 30.4 ± 4.0** | 33.1 ± 3.7** | 35.6 ± 3.0**, ## |
| RET (104/µL) | 30.9 ± 2.2 | 33.8 ± 9.1** | 40.0 ± 7.9** | 40.9 ± 7.2** |
| Na | 140.0 ± 1.4 | 139.4 ± 3.0 | 138.9 ± 2.1 | 140.1 ± 2.0 |
| K | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.4** | 6.3 ± 0.9** | 5.7 ± 0.4** |
| Cl | 100.6 ± 1.6 | 98.6 ± 4.1 | 99.7 ± 2.1 | 100.9 ± 2.2 |
| Ca (mg/dL) | 9.7 ± 0.3 | 8.7 ± 1.4* | 9.7 ± 0.4# | 9.7 ± 0.5# |
| IP (mEq/dL) | 6.2 ± 0.4 | 8.9 ± 1.7** | 7.7 ± 0.7** | 7.8 ± 1.1** |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1** | 2.3 ± 0.2** | 2.3 ± 0.1* |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.1* | 2.7 ± 0.2** | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
| Albumin/globulin | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 0.8 ± 0.04* | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.04 |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.3** | 4.9 ± 0.4** | 5.1 ± 0.1* |
| AST (IU/L) | 87.5 ± 12.0 | 63.6 ± 7.4** | 79.1 ± 14.9 | 77.7 ± 23.7 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 57.7 ± 5.9 | 52.3 ± 7.5 | 47.4 ± 9.9 | 53.6 ± 14.1 |
| LDH (IU/L) | 410.7 ± 131.5 | 166.7 ± 66.1 | 408.0 ± 372.2 | 337.4 ± 318.8 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 829.6 ± 152.5 | 883.3 ± 142.6 | 900.1 ± 105.2 | 916.1 ± 100.6 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.003 ± 0.007 | 0.001 ± 0.003 | 0.004 ± 0.008 | 0.001 ± 0.003 |
| Phospholipids (mg/dL) | 124.9 ± 15.9 | 200.0 ± 31.4** | 187.5 ± 21.1** | 185.7 ± 18.4** |
| TG (mg/dL) | 59.3 ± 26.6 | 96.0 ± 46.8 | 79.5 ± 34.9 | 57.8 ± 15.8# |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 71.5 ± 11.0 | 133.2 ± 20.3** | 124.5 ± 19.8** | 124.8 ± 15.0** |
| CK (IU/L) | 325.9 ± 148.1 | 152.1 ± 53.9 | 292.2 ± 215.8 | 245.8 ± 169.3 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 145.3 ± 19.1 | 130.0 ± 14.1 | 133.6 ± 15.1 | 133.2 ± 12.5 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group
*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, and #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group
RBC red blood cell, WBC white blood cell, HGB hemoglobin, HCT hematocrit, RET reticulocyte, IP inorganic phosphorus, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, TG triglycerides, CK creatine kinase
Fig. 3Effects of lactulose on renal functions of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Serum creatinine (a) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, b) in adenine-induced CKD rats. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group. ##p < 0.01 vs. control group at week 4
Fig. 4Effects of lactulose on uremic toxins of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Serum concentration of indoxyl sulfate (IS. a), p-cresyl sulfate (PCS, b) and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO, c) levels in adenine-induced CKD rats. Relationship between serum IS and serum creatinine (Cr, d) or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (e) in adenine-induced CKD rats; n = 33. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group. **p < 0.01 vs. normal group. ##p < 0.01 vs. control group
Fig. 5Effects of lactulose on oxidative stress markers (a, b) or antioxidant capacity (c–e) in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Serum advanced oxidation protein products. (AOPPs, a), serum malondialdehyde (MDA, b), serum thiol continent (c), serum reduced glutathione (GSH, d) and GSH/oxidized glutathione (GSSG) ratio (e). Values are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 9–12/group. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group
Fig. 6Effects of lactulose on relative kidney weights (a) and renal fibrosis (b–d) in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Representative micrographs showing Masson’s trichrome (MT) staining (b). Scale bar, 200 µm. Fibrosis was digitally quantified and is shown as percentage of blue area of MT stain in kidney section (c). TGF-β mRNA expression was examined with quantitative PCR (d). The expression levels were normalized to the levels in the kidney from the normal rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group. **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group, and ††p < 0.01 vs. 3.0-Lac group
Fig. 7Effects of lactulose on relative abundance of microbiota (a, b) and short-chain fatty acid (c) in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) rats. Alteration of composition of intestinal bacterial flora analyzed using terminal fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis. Relative abundance of microbiota based on the average number of each subfamily at the order and genus levels (a). Each subfamily is represented in separate graphs (b). Concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (c) in cecal contents were measured using post-column pH-buffered electroconductivity detection. Values are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 10–12/group. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. normal group, #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group, and †p < 0.05 and ††p < 0.01 vs. 3.0-Lac group