BACKGROUND: Among the controversial points in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is how much of the antrum to be resected. This study aimed to evaluate food tolerance after preservation or resection of the antrum during LSG. METHODS: Prospective randomized study included 50 patients scheduled for LSG. Participants were randomly allocated into one of two groups. In antral resection (AR-LSG) group (n = 25), resection started 2 cm from the pylorus. In antral sparing (AS-LSG) group (n = 25), it started 6 cm from the pylorus. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBL) were evaluated after 3 and 6 months. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Food tolerance was assessed using the Quality of Alimentation questionnaire. Primary outcome measure was food tolerance and %EWL. RESULTS:Food tolerance was significantly better in the antral sparing group compared to the antral resection group after 3 and 6 months. The two groups were comparable in %EWL and BMI change after 3 and 6 months. Six months after surgery, the majority of patients had a very good quality of life, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.877). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the pyloric antrum during LSG is associated with significantly better food tolerance and comparable effect of weight loss up to 6 months postoperatively when compared with total antral resection.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Among the controversial points in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is how much of the antrum to be resected. This study aimed to evaluate food tolerance after preservation or resection of the antrum during LSG. METHODS: Prospective randomized study included 50 patients scheduled for LSG. Participants were randomly allocated into one of two groups. In antral resection (AR-LSG) group (n = 25), resection started 2 cm from the pylorus. In antral sparing (AS-LSG) group (n = 25), it started 6 cm from the pylorus. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBL) were evaluated after 3 and 6 months. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Food tolerance was assessed using the Quality of Alimentation questionnaire. Primary outcome measure was food tolerance and %EWL. RESULTS: Food tolerance was significantly better in the antral sparing group compared to the antral resection group after 3 and 6 months. The two groups were comparable in %EWL and BMI change after 3 and 6 months. Six months after surgery, the majority of patients had a very good quality of life, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.877). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the pyloric antrum during LSG is associated with significantly better food tolerance and comparable effect of weight loss up to 6 months postoperatively when compared with total antral resection.
Authors: D Cottam; F G Qureshi; S G Mattar; S Sharma; S Holover; G Bonanomi; R Ramanathan; P Schauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-04-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mika Helmiö; Mikael Victorzon; Jari Ovaska; Marja Leivonen; Anne Juuti; Nabil Jaser; Pipsa Peromaa; Pekka Tolonen; Saija Hurme; Paulina Salminen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: D Nocca; D Krawczykowsky; B Bomans; P Noël; M C Picot; P M Blanc; C de Seguin de Hons; B Millat; M Gagner; L Monnier; J M Fabre Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Ralph Peterli; Bettina Karin Wölnerhanssen; Thomas Peters; Diana Vetter; Dino Kröll; Yves Borbély; Bernd Schultes; Christoph Beglinger; Jürgen Drewe; Marc Schiesser; Philipp Nett; Marco Bueter Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 56.272