Literature DB >> 30895497

Current status of spent embryo media research for preimplantation genetic testing.

Denice Belandres1, Mousa Shamonki2,3, Nabil Arrach4.   

Abstract

In recent years, a growing body of literature has emerged investigating the clinical utility of spent embryo media (SEM) for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) (Hammond et al. in Fertil Steril. 107(1):220-8, 2017; Xu et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(42):11907-12, 2016; Shamonki et al. in Fertil Steril. 106(6):1312-8, 2016; Feichtinger et al. in Reprod BioMed Online. 34(6):583-9, 2017; Vera-Rodriguez et al. in Hum Reprod. 33(4):745-56, 2018; Kuznyetsov et al. in PLoS One. 13(5):e0197262, 2018; Ho et al. in Fertil Steril. 110(3):467-75, 2018; Capalbo et al. in Fertil Steril. 110(5):870-9, 2018). Most of these studies have reported moderate success rates, suggesting the need for improvements in sensitivity and specificity. The concordance between spent media and embryo biopsy or whole embryo was reported to be between 30.4 and 90%, with 50-70% correlation being the most representative (Xu et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(42):11907-12, 2016; Shamonki et al. in Fertil Steril. 106(6):1312-8, 2016; Feichtinger et al. in Reprod BioMed Online. 34(6):583-9, 2017; Vera-Rodriguez et al. in Hum Reprod. 33(4):745-56, 2018; Kuznyetsov et al. in PLoS One. 13(5):e0197262, 2018; Ho et al. in Fertil Steril. 110(3):467-75, 2018). Here, we will analyze all spent media testing strategies including SEM collection methods, whole genome amplification (WGA) strategies, chromosome copy number detection, and bioinformatics analysis tools. We will propose improvements to further increase the accuracy and sensitivity of the assay before bringing PGT-A with SEM into the clinical sphere.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free DNA; Non-invasive; PGT-A; Preimplantation genetic screening; Spent embryo media; cfDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30895497      PMCID: PMC6541676          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01437-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  50 in total

1.  Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification.

Authors:  Frank B Dean; Seiyu Hosono; Linhua Fang; Xiaohong Wu; A Fawad Faruqi; Patricia Bray-Ward; Zhenyu Sun; Qiuling Zong; Yuefen Du; Jing Du; Mark Driscoll; Wanmin Song; Stephen F Kingsmore; Michael Egholm; Roger S Lasken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Use of multiple displacement amplification to amplify genomic DNA before sequencing of the alpha and beta haemoglobin genes.

Authors:  M Mai; J D Hoyer; R F McClure
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Quantification of fetal DNA by use of methylation-based DNA discrimination.

Authors:  Anders O H Nygren; Jarrod Dean; Taylor J Jensen; Selena Kruse; William Kwong; Dirk van den Boom; Mathias Ehrich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential.

Authors:  Shiri Barbash-Hazan; Tsvia Frumkin; Mira Malcov; Yuval Yaron; Tania Cohen; Foad Azem; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Esther Velilla; Pere Colls; Mercedez Garcia Bermudez; Mohan C Vemuri; Nury Steuerwald; John Garrisi; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  L Voullaire; L Wilton; H Slater; R Williamson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Mechanics of human blastocyst hatching in vitro.

Authors:  Henry Sathananthan; Judith Menezes; Sulochana Gunasheela
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 9.  The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome.

Authors:  M G Katz-Jaffe; S McReynolds; D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH.

Authors:  Dagan Wells; Samer Alfarawati; Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  3 in total

1.  Less-invasive chromosome screening of embryos and embryo assessment by genetic studies of DNA in embryo culture medium.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Hong Xia; Haixia Chen; Chenxi Yao; Lizhen Feng; Xueru Song; Xiaohong Bai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Minimally Invasive Cell-Free Human Embryo Aneuploidy Testing (miPGT-A) Utilizing Combined Spent Embryo Culture Medium and Blastocoel Fluid -Towards Development of a Clinical Assay.

Authors:  Valeriy Kuznyetsov; Svetlana Madjunkova; Rina Abramov; Ran Antes; Zenon Ibarrientos; Gelareh Motamedi; Afsaneh Zaman; Iryna Kuznyetsova; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Simone Cornelisse; Miriam Zagers; Elena Kostova; Kathrin Fleischer; Madelon van Wely; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.