Catriona Duncan1,2,3, Ghadir J Omran1,3, Jiasian Teh1,3,4, Niall F Davis1, Damien M Bolton1, Nathan Lawrentschuk5,6,7. 1. Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. 2. North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. 3. Young Urologists Research Organization (YURO), Melbourne, Australia. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia. 5. Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. lawrentschuk@gmail.com. 6. Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia. lawrentschuk@gmail.com. 7. Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. lawrentschuk@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Data assessing the effectiveness of intracavernosal injections (ICIs) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are limited. This study evaluates intracavernosal injectable therapies for ED and reviews available guidelines that inform clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic search using electronic databases (Medline, Pubmed) was performed for studies investigating injectable management strategies for ED published after 1990. Primary outcome measures were to comparatively evaluate clinical efficacy, continuation rates and adverse event profiles of each injectable agent as monotherapy or in combination. The secondary outcome measurement was to discuss available guidelines that inform clinical practice for injectable agents. RESULTS: ICIs demonstrate clinical efficacy in 54-100% of patients, early discontinuation rates of ≤ 38% and adverse events in ≤ 26%. Discontinuation rates are typically greatest within 3-6 months of commencement. Anxiety related to the initial injection occurs in approximately 65% and anxiety levels can remain high for 4 months. Approval of intracavernosal injection agents is mainly limited to alprostadil with the recent addition of aviptadil/phentolamine combination therapy in a select few geographical regions. Although combination therapies are attractive alternative options, their formulations are variable and should be standardised before widespread acceptance is achieved. CONCLUSIONS: ICIs are associated with good clinical efficacy rates, high discontinuation rates and a moderate side-effect profile. They represent an important tool in the urological armamentarium for treating ED in patients that cannot tolerate or are refractory to oral therapies.
PURPOSE: Data assessing the effectiveness of intracavernosal injections (ICIs) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are limited. This study evaluates intracavernosal injectable therapies for ED and reviews available guidelines that inform clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic search using electronic databases (Medline, Pubmed) was performed for studies investigating injectable management strategies for ED published after 1990. Primary outcome measures were to comparatively evaluate clinical efficacy, continuation rates and adverse event profiles of each injectable agent as monotherapy or in combination. The secondary outcome measurement was to discuss available guidelines that inform clinical practice for injectable agents. RESULTS: ICIs demonstrate clinical efficacy in 54-100% of patients, early discontinuation rates of ≤ 38% and adverse events in ≤ 26%. Discontinuation rates are typically greatest within 3-6 months of commencement. Anxiety related to the initial injection occurs in approximately 65% and anxiety levels can remain high for 4 months. Approval of intracavernosal injection agents is mainly limited to alprostadil with the recent addition of aviptadil/phentolamine combination therapy in a select few geographical regions. Although combination therapies are attractive alternative options, their formulations are variable and should be standardised before widespread acceptance is achieved. CONCLUSIONS: ICIs are associated with good clinical efficacy rates, high discontinuation rates and a moderate side-effect profile. They represent an important tool in the urological armamentarium for treating ED in patients that cannot tolerate or are refractory to oral therapies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Erectile dysfunction (ED); Intracavernosal injections; Treatment of ED; Treatment of erectile dysfunction
Authors: Geoff Hackett; Phil Kell; David Ralph; John Dean; David Price; Mark Speakman; Kevan Wylie Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Arthur L Burnett; Ajay Nehra; Rodney H Breau; Daniel J Culkin; Martha M Faraday; Lawrence S Hakim; Joel Heidelbaugh; Mohit Khera; Kevin T McVary; Martin M Miner; Christian J Nelson; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Allen D Seftel; Alan W Shindel Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ji Kan Ryu; Kang Su Cho; Su Jin Kim; Kyung Jin Oh; Sung Chul Kam; Kyung Keun Seo; Hong Seok Shin; Soo Woong Kim Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 5.400
Authors: Kyle A Blum; Justin P Mehr; Travis Green; Lauren Conroy; Vanessa Marino; Daniel Kim; Kailash Panchapakesan; Liam Murphy; Sravan Panuganti; Run Wang Journal: Sex Med Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 2.523