| Literature DB >> 30894841 |
Sabine Leroy1, Souad Christieans2, Régine Talon1.
Abstract
The presence of determinants of resistance to antibiotics can constitute a possible safety hazard in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), which are widely present in food of animal origin. Among CNS, S. xylosus is a species frequently isolated from fermented meat products. Resistance to tetracycline was found to be one of the most distributed resistances occurring in S. xylosus strains isolated from fermented sausages. We evaluated the transfer of tetracycline resistance in vitro and in situ between S. xylosus strains. We selected three strains isolated from dry fermented sausages, resistant to tetracycline but not to minocycline, their resistance occurring by a mechanism of active efflux encoded by the tetK gene. Only one strain was able to transfer its tetracycline resistance to a recipient strain initially susceptible and plasmid-free using a filter mating procedure. Transfer of tetracycline resistance was observed at very low frequencies of 3.4 × 10-9 per recipient. To further investigate the transferability of this tetracycline resistance, the donor and recipient strains were tested in pilot-scale fermented sausage production. This transfer was possible but at a low rate, 1.4 × 10-7, and only under conditions of a high inoculation level of 108 CFU/g of meat. The tetK gene is located on a small mobilizable plasmid close to Staphylococcus aureus pT181 plasmid. In conclusion, the transfer of tetracycline resistance between strains of S. xylosus is possible, but at a really low frequency in vitro and in situ in fermented sausages. Even if this represents a very moderate risk, it should be taken into account as required by the European approach of Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) and AFSSA safety recommendations, advising that strains used as starter cultures should not carry any transferable antibiotic resistance.Entities:
Keywords: S. xylosus; antibiotic resistance; sausage; tetracycline; transfer
Year: 2019 PMID: 30894841 PMCID: PMC6414713 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Microbial and physico-chemical-characteristics of the fermented sausages over 30 days of ripening.
| Selective media | Days | T0 | T6 | T30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch E1 | pH | 5.80 ± 0.08 | 5.20 ± 0.06 | 5.55 ± 0.12 |
| Aw | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | |
| MRS | Lactic acid bacteria | 6.45 ± 0.26 | 7.68 ± 0.31 | 8.72 ± 0.14 |
| Chapman | Staphylococci | 6.68 ± 0.15 | 7.71 ± 0.15 | 7.46 ± 0.26 |
| BHI + Tet |
| 5.87 ± 0.21 | 7.11 ± 0.14 | 6.87 ± 0.15 |
| BHI + Rif + Fus |
| 6.08 ± 0.16 | 5.94 ± 0.12 | 5.29 ± 0.16 |
| BHI + Tet + Rif + Fus | Transconjugant | ND | ND | ND |
| Batch E2 | pH | 5.82 ± 0.05 | 5.25 ± 0.08 | 5.56 ± 0.16 |
| Aw | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | |
| MRS | Lactic acid bacteria | 6.62 ± 0.10 | 7.69 ± 0.23 | 8.52 ± 0.15 |
| Chapman | Staphylococci | 8.32 ± 0.15 | 8.72 ± 0.16 | 8.03 ± 0.13 |
| BHI + Tet |
| 7.92 ± 0.14 | 8.24 ± 0.15 | 7.60 ± 0.12 |
| BHI + Rif + Fus |
| 8.56 ± 0.16 | 8.33 ± 0.15 | 7.29 ± 0.12 |
| BHI + Tet + Rif + Fus | Transconjugant | ND | 3 colonies | 1 colony |
Enumeration expressed in log CFU/g.
Tet, tetracycline; Rif, rifampicin; Fus, fusidic acid; ND, not detected.
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of S. xylosus strains determined by disk diffusion.
| Recipient | Donor | Transconjugants | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In sausages | ||||||||
| Disk | C2a | XIV 10B1 | TC1 | TC2 | E2–1 | E2–2 | E2–3 | E2–4 |
| Tetracycline | 38 | 10 (R) | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 |
| Minocycline | 38 (S) | 30 (S) | 36 | 34 | 38 | 34 | 36 | 34 |
| Rifampicin | 6 (R) | 32 (S) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Fusidic acid | 9 (R) | 24 (S) | 9 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Penicillin G | 34 (S) | 14 (R) | 34 | 33 | 36 | 32 | 30 | 32 |
Diameter expressed in mm.
S, sensitive; R, resistant.
Figure 1Analysis of tetK PCR (360 bp product). XIV 10B1: donor strain; C2a: recipient strain; TC1 and TC2: transconjugants obtained after in vitro mating; E2–1, E2–2, E2–3: transconjugants isolated from sausages after 6 days of fermentation; E2–4: transconjugant isolated from sausages after 30 days of ripening; Te: negative control; M: DNA 100 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific).
Figure 2Plasmid analysis from S. xylosus XIV 10B1 and transconjugants. (A) Agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. (B) Colorimetric detection of Southern blot hybridization with a DIG-labeled probe of the tetK gene. XIV 10B1: donor strain; TC1 and TC2: transconjugants obtained after in vitro mating; E2–1, E2–2, E2–3: transconjugants isolated from sausages after 6 days of fermentation; E2–4: transconjugant isolated from sausages after 30 days of ripening; M1: DNA Molecular Weight Marker III, DIG-labeled (Sigma-Aldrich); M2: MassRuler DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific).
Figure 3PFGE profiles from S. xylosus strains. C2a: recipient strain; XIV 10B1: donor strain; TC1 and TC2: transconjugants obtained after in vitro mating; E2–1, E2–2, E2–3: transconjugants isolated from sausages after 6 days of fermentation; E2–4: transconjugant isolated from sausages after 30 days of ripening, M: Lambda ladder (Promega).