| Literature DB >> 30894539 |
Lu Zhao1,2, Yun Zhang1,3, Lin-Bo Huang1,2, Xiao-Zhi Liu2,4, Qing-Hua Zhang4, Chao He1,2, Ze-Yuan Wu1,2, Lin-Juan Zhang5, Jinpeng Wu6, Wanli Yang6, Lin Gu4, Jin-Song Hu7,8, Li-Jun Wan1,2.
Abstract
Although single-atomically dispersedEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30894539 PMCID: PMC6426845 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09290-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1The cascade anchoring strategy for the synthesis of M–NC SACs. First, chelating agent (glucose) efficiently sequesters metal ions and binds to O-rich carbon support, while excessive glucoses physically isolate glucose–metal complexes on carbon substrate. Second, the chelated metal complexes further secure metal atoms via the decomposed residues up to certain temperature. Third, CNx species decomposed from melamine at higher temperature subsequently capture metal atoms to form M–Nx moieties and integrate into the pyrolyzed carbon layer
Fig. 2Structural characterizations of PC support and Fe–NC SAC. a SEM image of PC support. b XRD patterns of PC and Fe–NC SAC. c TEM, d, HRTEM, e, HAADF–STEM images of Fe–NC SAC. f HAADF–STEM image and EELS mapping images of Fe, N, and overlaid Fe and N on Fe–NC SAC. Scale bars, 1 μm (a); 200 nm (c); 20 nm (d); 3 nm (e); 2 nm (f)
Fig. 3Atomic structure analysis of Fe–NC SAC by XAFS and XPS. a Fe K-edge XANES spectra (inset: first-derivative curves), b Fourier transform of Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra, and c, Wavelet transform of the k3-weighted EXAFS data of Fe–NC SAC and reference samples (FePc and Fe foil). d N K-edge NEXAFS spectra and e, deconvoluted N 1s XPS spectra of Fe–NC SAC and reference FePc
Fig. 4Structural characterizations of control samples. a XRD patterns and b–g, TEM images of Fe@C–N (b), Fe(acac)3–NC (c), Fe–NC SAC–EDTA (d), Fe–NC SAC–KB (e), Fe–N–GO (f), and Fe@C-Glu (g). Scale bars: 200 nm (b, d); 100 nm (c, e, f); 500 nm (g)
Fig. 5Evaluation of electrocatalytic performance of Fe–NC SAC for ORR. a Steady-state ORR polarization curves of Fe–NC SAC, Pt/C and control samples (Fe@C–N and Fe@C-Glu). b Corresponding Tafel plots. c Hydrogen peroxide yield. d Steady-state ORR polarization curves of Fe–NC SAC recorded in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH with or without poisoning by 0.01 M SCN−, and one collected after removing SCN−. e Steady-state ORR polarization curves of Fe–NC SAC with different Fe loading. f Steady-state ORR polarization curves of Fe–NC SAC and Pt/C before and after 5000 potential scanning cycles in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH
Fig. 6Atomic structure characterizations and loading analysis of M–NC SACs. a–f HAADF–STEM images for Mn–NC SAC (a), Co–NC SAC (b), Ni–NC SAC (c), Cu–NC SAC (d), Mo–NC SAC (e), and Pt–NC SAC (f). Scale bars, 3 nm (a–f). g Metal loading in M–NC SACs. h Faradaic efficiency of CO, and i, jco for Ni–NC SAC and control sample (NC)