Wendy Liermann1, Jana Frahm2, Ingrid Halle2, Susanne Bühler2, Jeannette Kluess2, Liane Hüther2, Sven Dänicke2. 1. 1 Institute of Nutritional Physiology, "Oskar Kellner", Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany. 2. 2 Institute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Brunswick, Germany.
Abstract
The present study investigated clinical and immunological modulations due to intramuscular injection of Escherichia coli LPS in 49-wk-old laying hens over 48 h post injection (p.i.). LPS induced characteristic sickness behavior but no significant body temperature alterations ( P > 0.05). During experimental period decreases in blood albumin, calcium, phosphorus and tryptophan concentrations, hyperglycemia, increased plasma nitrite concentrations, leucopenia, decreased thrombocyte counts, lymphopenia, heterophilia and an increased heterophilic granulocyte/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio were observed after LPS administration. Time-dependent effects were shown on T and B cell subsets in caecal tonsils (CT) and on splenic CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ proportions, on IL-1β and -10 and inducible NO synthase mRNA expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), liver, spleen and CT, and on the mRNA expression of the TLR4 in PBL, liver and spleen p.i. ( P < 0.05). The main responding period of mentioned alterations due to LPS appears to include the period from 2 until 8 h p.i. According to the H/L ratio, the most stressful phase was 5 h p.i. T and B cell subsets in CT, the IL-1β and TLR4 mRNA expression in liver and plasma nitrite concentrations seemed to be affected for a longer period.
The present study investigated clinical and immunological modulations due to intramuscular injection of Escherichia coliLPS in 49-wk-old laying hens over 48 h post injection (p.i.). LPS induced characteristic sickness behavior but no significant body temperature alterations ( P > 0.05). During experimental period decreases in blood albumin, calcium, phosphorus and tryptophan concentrations, hyperglycemia, increased plasma nitrite concentrations, leucopenia, decreased thrombocyte counts, lymphopenia, heterophilia and an increased heterophilic granulocyte/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio were observed after LPS administration. Time-dependent effects were shown on T and B cell subsets in caecal tonsils (CT) and on splenic CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ proportions, on IL-1β and -10 and inducible NO synthase mRNA expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), liver, spleen and CT, and on the mRNA expression of the TLR4 in PBL, liver and spleen p.i. ( P < 0.05). The main responding period of mentioned alterations due to LPS appears to include the period from 2 until 8 h p.i. According to the H/L ratio, the most stressful phase was 5 h p.i. T and B cell subsets in CT, the IL-1β and TLR4 mRNA expression in liver and plasma nitrite concentrations seemed to be affected for a longer period.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acute phase response; T and B cells; cytokines; laying hens; lipopolysaccharides
Bacterial LPS, which are present in the cell envelopes of Gram-negative bacteria, are
known as potent stimulators of the innate immune system and inducers of inflammation
and sickness behavior in mammals, but also in chickens.[1] For some time, LPS has attracted less attention in poultry studies because
there was a dominant view that, compared with mammals, poultry are more resistant to
these chemical compounds. Today, it is known that there are some similarities in the
response of mammals and poultry to LPS, and they are used in several studies and
bacterial infection models with chicken as an immune stimulator and inducer of the
acute phase response.[2-5] However, previous studies also
revealed some differences in the acute phase response induced by LPS, especially
between positive and negative acute phase reactants.[3]In previous studies dealing with the effect of LPS on chicken, investigations were
conducted at large intervals, or at selective time points, which could hide crucial
time points for LPS responses and impede the comparability of results. Especially,
the period immediately after LPS injection has received less attention in the past,
although clinical symptoms induced by LPS injection are observed already within 1 h
post administration.[4],[6] Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of LPS on
clinical and immunological traits of laying hens at different short time intervals
from 0.5 h to 48 h after LPS administration in comparison to a physiological
value.
Materials and methods
The present experiment was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the German
animal protection law on the experimental station of the Institute of Animal
Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal
Health in Brunswick, Germany. The experimental conditions and procedures were
approved by the responsible authority, Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer
Protection and Food Safety, LAVES, Germany (registration number:
33.92-42502-04-13/1186).
Animals and husbandry
The present study was performed with 36 49-wk-old laying hens (7th laying mo)
(Lohmann Brown). Before the beginning of the study, the birds were housed in
groups under conventional conditions in floor pens. Birds had an average initial
body mass (BM) of 1.9 kg, and an initial laying intensity of 93.4%. The initial
average egg mass was 63.0 g. From wk 49 onwards, the animals were kept in
single-cages (42 cm × 35 cm × 42 cm). The cages were integrated in a climate
controlled room with a constant temperature of 18°C. The illumination period
lasted from 4.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m. (16 h light: 8 h dark). Each cage was
equipped with a feeding and a water trough, which enable an ad
libitum access to feed and water throughout the entire experimental
period. Hens were fed a commercial grain-soybean meal diet for high-performing
laying hens.
Experimental design
After changing of the housing conditions, a 3-d adaptation period was granted. On
d 4, at the start of the experimental day (6.30 a.m.), the general conditions of
the animals were assessed by a previously described scoring system according to
their body posture (0 = normal – 4 = lateral position), behavior (0 = normal –
4 = comatose), plumage (0 = normal – 4 = feather loss, initiating alopecia),
respiratory rate (0 = normal – dyspnea, beak respiration) and color of wattles,
combs, conjunctiva and legs (0 = normal – 4 = necrotic).[6] Furthermore, the animals were weighed, and rectal body temperature was
measured. Initially (7.15 a.m.), three animals were slaughtered by mechanical
stunning and exsanguination. At 8.00 a.m. the remaining 33 birds were treated
intramuscularly (Musculus pectoralis) with 2 mg LPS (from
Escherichia coli O111:B4; Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany)
per kg BM. At 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h post injection (p.i.)
three animals per time point were slaughtered as described above. Approximately
15 min before slaughtering, the general conditions were assessed by the above
described scoring system. BM and rectal body temperature were measured
immediately before slaughtering.
Sample collection
During slaughtering, blood samples were collected into commercial serum and
heparin tubes. Heart, liver with bile bladder, kidneys, spleen, and caecal
tonsils (CT) were dissected and weighed. The spleen was cut into two pieces. One
section of the spleen and the right CT (only at time points 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12,
24 and 48 h p.i.) were stored in PBS on ice until further analyses. At the time
points 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h p.i. liver, the remaining spleen section
and the left CT were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C.
Blood analyses
Heparinized blood was collected in a micro-hematocrit tube and centrifuged at
12,000 g for 5 min by a hematocrit (HCT) centrifuge
(Haematokrit 210; Hettich Lab Technology, Tuttlingen, Germany) for determination
of HCT.According to the recommendations of Pendl, two blood smears per bird were
prepared, stained by Pappenheim solution and subsequently counted.[7] Leucocytes and thrombocytes were counted in 20 fields of vision, and at
least 200 leucocytes were differentiated according to their morphological
characteristics at 1000 × magnification.Albumin, total protein, glucose (Glc), cholesterol, γ-glutamyltranferase,
bilirubin, triglycerides, urea, β-hydroxybutyrate and non-esterified fatty acids
were analyzed in serum blood samples by an automatic clinical chemistry analyzer
(Eurolyser CCA180; Eurolyser Diagnostica GmbH, Salzburg, Austria). Tryptophan,
nicotinamide and kynurenine were measured in serum by HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto,
Japan) according to methods described by Hüther et al.[8] Calcium and phosphorus concentrations in plasma were determined
spectrophotometrically (Unicam UV/Vis Spectrometer UV4; Unicam, Kassel, Germany)
using commercial kits of Greiner Diagnostic GmbH (Bahlingen, Germany).Ferric acid reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) was determined according to the
methods of Benzie and Strain.[9] In brief, 300 µl warm FRAP reagent (37°C) containing acetate buffer (on
base of sodium acetate trihydrate (Merck KGaK; Darmstadt, Germany), acetic acid
and distilled water), iron-chloride-hexahydrate (Merck KGaK; Darmstadt, Germany)
and 2,4,6- tripyridyl-striazine (TPTZ; Merck KGaK; Darmstadt, Germany) were
added to wells of a microtiter plate containing 10 µl of the plasma sample and
30 µl H2O. The absorbance change (ΔA) was measured
at a wavelength of 593 nm every 36 s for 15 min by a microplate reader
(Infinite® M200; Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland).The concentration of nitrite in plasma was analyzed by using the Griess reaction
and a Cayman Assay kit (Cayman Chemical; Ann Abor, MI). The absorbance was
measured at a wavelength of 540 nm by a microplate reader also used in the FRAP
analyses.
PBL isolation
Initially, PBLs were isolated by different wash steps and the use of Biocoll
separation solution (Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany) according to methods
described by Liermann et al.[10] Part of the received cell solution was used for flow cytometric analyses.
The remaining part of the cell suspension was centrifuged at 250
g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellet was frozen and stored at
–80°C until further analyses.
Isolation of leucocytes from spleen and CT
Spleen and the right CT were rinsed, and surrounding tissues were cut. Leucocytes
were isolated according to methods of Liermann et al.[10] Briefly, tissues were transferred into a Petri dish containing 5 ml PBS
and cut lengthwise. Cells were released by gentle scraping. The cell suspension
was sieved using CellTrics® (mash size 50 µm) (Partec GmbH, Görlitz, Germany).
While the cell suspension of caecal tonsils contained almost no erythrocytes,
the cell suspension of spleen cells have to undergo an additional lysis step.
Therefore, 1000 µl of the cell suspension was re-suspended in 1000 µl of an
ammonium chloride lysis buffer containing potassium bicarbonate and EDTA (pH
7.4) and centrifuged at 250 g for 5 min at 4°C. The samples of
caecal tonsils and spleen were subsequently washed by Roswell Park Memorial
Institute medium (RPMI-1640; Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and centrifugation
at 250 g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellet was re-suspended in
RPMI-1640 and stored on ice until flow cytometric measurements.
Flow cytometric measurements
Isolated PBLs and cells isolated from spleen and CT were incubated with mAbs
against CD3 (T cells) (mouse anti-chickenCD3: PE; Southern Biotech; Birmingham,
AL), CD4 (T helper cells) (mouse anti-chickenCD4: FITC; Southern Biotech) and
CD8 (T cytotoxic cells) (mouse anti-chickenCD8: Cy5; Southern Biotech) for 30
min at room temperature in the dark. Further samples were incubated with an Ab
against Bu1 (B cells) (mouse anti-chicken Bu-1: FITC; Southern Biotech) under
conditions similar to those described above. Samples intended for corresponding
isotype controls were incubated with either mouse IgG1 negative control: PE;
mouse IgG1 negative control: FITC or mouse IgG1 negative control: Cy5 (Southern
Biotech). Thereafter, 1000 µl HEPES-buffered saline was added and the samples
were centrifuged at 250 g for 5 min at 4°C. Subsequently, the T
and B cell subsets were measured by FACS Canto II (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA).
At least 10,000 cells were counted. The BD FACSDiva™ Software (BD Biosciences)
was used to evaluate results and compensate non-specific signals indicated by
isotype controls.
Gene expression analyses
The methods for the extraction of RNA from the PBL cell pellet and tissues, cDNA
synthesis and quantitative Real-Time PCR were described by Bühler et al.[11] and Drong et al.[12]Briefly, extraction of total RNA was performed according to the manufacturer’s
protocol using a chaotropic ions buffer system and a silica membrane
(NucleoSpin® RNA II; Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany). Contaminating DNA was
digested on-column. RNA extracted from PBLs and tissues was eluted with
H2O. A Nano Drop® ND-1000 (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE) was used to
assess RNA concentration and quality. The integrity of the RNA was verified by
1.1% agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA was stored at –80°C until further
analyses.A total of 1000 ng RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a qScript™ cDNA
Synthesis Kit (Quanta Biosciences™, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) in a thermal cycler
(Biometra GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). For subsequent analysis, the cDNA thus
obtained was diluted with H2O and frozen in aliquots at –20°C.Gene-specific primer pairs were designed using Primer-BLAST and are summarized in
Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of primers used in real-time PCR.
Gene
Forward primer (fw) (5′-3′)Reverse primer (rev) (5′-3′)
PCR product size (bp)
Accession number
Reference genes
ACTB
ATGATATTGCTGCGCTCGTTG
134
NM_205518.1
CATACCAACCATCACACCCTGA
H6PD
GGACCACTACCTTGGCAAACA
152
XM_425746.5
AACTGGTGCGGCCTTTAGCA
RPL4
GAGTGACTACAACCTGCCGA
124
NM_001007479.1
TTTCAGGACTCTGCGGTGAA
GAPDH
CCGTCCTCTCTGGCAAAGTC
115
NM_204305.1
ACAGTGCCCTTGAAGTGTCC
TBP
CTCTGGGATAGTGCCACAGC
124
NM_205103.1
AGCAGCAAAACGCTTGGGAT
HMBS
TGGCTGTAGTGTCCCTGTTG
150
XM_417846.5
GGTCCATCTTCATTCCGGTGT
Target genes
IL1
TGCCTGCAGAAGAAGCCTCG
137
NM_204524.1
CTCCGCAGCAGTTTGGTCAT
IL10
GCTGAGGGTGAAGTTTGAGGAA
121
NM_001004414.2
AGACTGGCAGCCAAAGGTC
TLR4
CTGGATCTTTCAAGGTGCCACA
102
NM_001030693.1
GTGCTGGAGTGAATTGGCAG
NOS2
TCTCCACTTCTGTTTCCAGGC
89
NM_204961.1
TGTGTGATGTGGGAACGCTT
Characteristics of primers used in real-time PCR.The quantitative Real-Time PCR was conducted in duplicate on a CFX96™ Real-Time
PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) using 5 µl of cDNA
(corresponding to 25 ng RNA) and a iTaq™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix
(Bio-Rad) in a final volume of 15 µl. After an initial denaturation step at 95°C
for 30 s, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s and annealing as well as
elongation for 30 s at 60°C followed. After the last amplification cycle, a
melting curve analysis from 60°C to 95°C in 0.5°C increments was performed to
ensure generation of single PCR products. Cq-Values of target and
reference genes were obtained by the CFX Manager™ Software 3.1 (Bio-Rad). The
genes β-actin (ACTB), GAPDH, hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase/Glc
1-dehydrogenase (H6PD) and ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4) exhibiting a mean
reference target stability M value of 0.85 were identified as the optimal
reference genes in PBLs by the qBase+ software 2.5 (Biogazelle NV,
Zwijnaarde, Belgium) (Table
1). The optimal reference genes in liver and spleen were RPL4, GAPDH
and TATA-box binding protein
(TBP) (mean reference target stability M value liver = 0.29; spleen = 0.27) and
in CT RPL4, hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) and TBP (mean reference target
stability M value = 0.23).
Calculations and statistical analyses
The sum of cells of counted fields of vision of a blood smear was multiplied by
the factor 875 according to recommendations of Pendl[7] to calculate the total counts of leucocytes and thrombocytes. All animals
had a HCT lower than 35%; therefore, cell counts had to be corrected by the
following equation:[7]Corrected cell counts [cells/µl blood] = Σ of cells of 20 fields of vision × 87
5× HCT [%]/45%.The H/L ratio was calculated by dividing heterophilic granulocytes by lymphocytes
counted in a blood smear.For statistical analyses, variance analysis of the SAS Enterprise guide 6.1 was
used, which considered the fixed effect “time”. Time-dependent effects and
differences between parameters estimated at various time points after LPS
administration and the physiological value before LPS injection were assessed as
statistically significant at P < 0.05. The SAS Enterprise
Guide 6.1 was also used to estimate Pearson correlation coefficient; r.
Correlations were assessed as significant at P
values < 0.05.
Results
Clinical symptoms and body temperature
First noticeable clinical symptoms were observed at 0.45 h p.i., as indicated by
changes in behaviour such as reduced activity and slightly or moderately ruffled
plumage. One animal showed slight alterations of wattles and comb color.
Alterations in behaviour, activity, plumage and wattles and comb color rapidly
exacerbated within 1.45 h p.i. and persisted until 5.45 h p.i. Additionally, at
3.45 h p.i. some animals showed alterations in respiratory rate. After
6.45 h p.i. the clinical symptoms began to regress. Alterations in the
respiratory rate were no longer apparent from 7.45 h p.i. At 8 h p.i. almost all
clinical symptoms were completely reversed. At no time of the experimental
period changes in the color of conjunctivae or legs were observed. No premature
animal losses occurred during the experiment.The rectal body temperature varied between the minimum of 40.3°C and the maximum
of 41.4°C. There were no significant differences in the rectal body temperature
of animals slaughtered before LPS injection and animals slaughtered at different
time points after LPS injection (P > 0.05). Only 0.5 h p.i.
the body temperature (mean = 40.8°C ± 0.1) seemed to be slightly reduced
compared with animals slaughtered before LPS injection
(mean = 41.2°C ± 0.1).
BM and visceral organs
BM at the beginning of the experiment (data not shown) and immediately before
slaughtering (Table
2) did not differ between animals slaughtered before or at various
time points after LPS injection (P > 0.05). Furthermore,
there were no significant differences between visceral organ masses of animals
slaughtered before LPS injection and animals slaughtered at various time points
after LPS injection. However, a time-dependent effect was detected for the
masses of spleen (P = 0.018).
Table 2.
BM and various visceral organs after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).
Time after LPS injection (h)
BM (kg)
Heart (g/kg BM)
Liver (g/kg BM)
Kidney (g/kg BM)
Spleen (g/kg BM)
Caecal tonsils (g/kg BM)
0
1.8
4.1
22.9
5.6
0.8
0.3
0.5
2.0
3.9
21.6
5.6
0.9
n.m.[a]
1
1.9
4.1
23.8
5.8
1.0
n.m.
2
1.8
3.9
23.8
6.2
0.8
0.4
3
1.8
3.6
21.0
6.2
0.8
n.m.
4
1.8
4.2
21.0
7.2
0.9
0.3
5
1.8
4.0
21.6
6.6
1.0
n.m.
6
1.7
3.6
21.4
6.9
0.7
0.3
8
1.8
4.0
20.7
6.7
1.2
0.3
12
1.8
3.5
22.2
6.3
1.2
0.3
24
1.9
4.2
18.1
6.7
0.9
0.3
48
1.6
4.2
18.7
6.1
1.2
0.3
P Value
0.201
0.859
0.207
0.601
0.018
0.814
PSEM
0.1
0.4
1.4
0.6
0.1
0.04
BM: body mass measured immediately before slaughtering; PSEM:
combined standard error of means.
aNot measured.
BM and various visceral organs after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).BM: body mass measured immediately before slaughtering; PSEM:
combined standard error of means.aNot measured.
Clinical chemistry, calcium, phosphorus, tryptophan, kynurenine and
niacin
During the experiment, a time-dependent effect on albumin and Glc was observed
(P < 0.05) (Table 3). The concentration of albumin
increased numerically from 0 until 0.5 h p.i. and decreased numerically
thereafter until 5 h p.i. At 48 h p.i. the albumin concentration was numerically
higher compared with the concentration measured in animals slaughtered before
LPS injection. Animals slaughtered 3, 4, 5 and 6 h p.i. showed significantly
higher Glc concentration in blood serum than animals slaughtered before LPS
injection (P < 0.05). The highest concentration of Glc was
measured 6 h p.i. No effect of time was observed on other parameters of clinical
chemistry.
Table 3.
Traits of clinical chemistry after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).
Time after LPS injection (h)
Albumin (g/l)
Globulin (g/l)
Albumin/ globulin ratio
Total protein (g/l)
Glc (mg/dl)
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
γ-GT (U/l)
Bilirubin (mg/dl)
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
Uric acid (mg/dl)
0
21.5
23.4
0.99
44.8
227.2c
122.0
28.6
<d.l.
631.0
3.82
0.5
22.8
22.8
1.00
45.5
280.8abc
108.3
23.8
0.10
460.2
3.90
1
22.6
29.7
0.98
52.4
282.6abc
96.1
26.7
0.13
613.0
2.53
2
20.7
17.8
1.18
38.5
259.0abc
94.0
27.5
0.13
1027.3
2.07
3
18.7
38.4
0.93
57.1
293.0ab
89.1
23.5
0.17
781.1
2.13
4
18.7
25.0
1.04
43.7
298.9ab
87.6
23.9
0.16
1316.1
2.75
5
18.6
11.7
1.60
30.3
297.6ab
79.5
23.0
0.17
1073.9
3.55
6
18.8
20.8
1.00
39.6
311.0a
86.5
26.1
0.15
1532.1
4.84
8
18.8
15.7
1.22
34.5
276.9abc
94.0
23.9
0.17
1322.6
4.83
12
21.5
18.3
1.20
39.9
260.3abc
90.2
20.8
0.12
1008.4
5.49
24
20.0
18.3
1.09
38.3
237.8bc
68.5
24.5
0.12
847.0
4.31
48
24.4
23.4
1.08
47.8
249.5abc
63.7
21.9
0.10
926.3
6.09
P Value
0.032
0.753
0.615
0.726
0.002
0.690
0.810
0.572
0.308
0.418
PSEM
1.3
8.5
0.20
8.9
12.8
18.2
3.0
0.03
286.3
1.27
γ-GT: γ-glutamyltransferase; PSEM: combined standard error of means;
d. l.: detection limit.
a,b,cDifferent superscripts mark significant differences
between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).
Traits of clinical chemistry after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).γ-GT: γ-glutamyltransferase; PSEM: combined standard error of means;
d. l.: detection limit.a,b,cDifferent superscripts mark significant differences
between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).A time-dependent effect was detected on blood concentrations of calcium,
phosphorus and tryptophan (P < 0.05) but not on blood niacin
concentrations (P > 0.05) (Table 4). Significant differences
between these concentrations in animals slaughtered before or after LPS
injection were not observed. However, calcium concentrations of animals
slaughtered 2 h p.i. were significantly higher compared with concentrations of
animals slaughtered 24 h p.i. There was a significant positive correlation
between calcium concentrations and the blood albumin concentrations
(r = 0.522, P = 0.001). Animals
slaughtered 12 h p.i. showed significantly higher concentrations of phosphorus
compared with animals slaughtered 5 and 48 h p.i. Compared with animals
slaughtered before LPS injection animals slaughtered at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 and
48 h p.i. had only numerically but markedly lower phosphorus concentrations in
blood. The tryptophan concentrations were slightly increased at 0.5 h p.i.
Thereafter, the concentrations decreased significantly from 2 h until 5 h p.i.
After 6 h p.i. the concentrations increased once again. The concentrations of
tryptophan differed no longer from values measured 0.5 h p.i. from 24 h p.i.
Table 4.
Blood concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, tryptophan and niacin after
LPS injection (means; n = 3).
Time after LPS injection (h)
Calcium (mg/dl)
Phosphorus (mg/dl)
Tryptophan (µg/ml)
Niacin (µg/ml)
0
18.1ab
5.2ab
9.4abcd
0.70
0.5
17.5ab
5.9ab
13.5a
0.81
1
17.7ab
5.1ab
9.0abcd
0.63
2
18.7a
3.7ab
7.5cd
0.64
3
16.8ab
4.4ab
6.3d
0.64
4
17.3ab
3.3ab
5.6d
0.67
5
16.4ab
2.7b
5.5d
0.54
6
15.9ab
3.8ab
5.8d
0.57
8
15.9ab
3.7ab
6.7d
0.72
12
15.7ab
6.9a
8.3bcd
0.51
24
14.7b
3.7ab
12.6ab
0.53
48
16.9ab
2.5b
11.8abc
0.85
P Value
0.034
0.013
< 0.001
0.318
PSEM
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.10
PSEM: combined standard error of means.
a,b,c,dDifferent superscripts mark significant differences
between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).
Blood concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, tryptophan and niacin after
LPS injection (means; n = 3).PSEM: combined standard error of means.a,b,c,dDifferent superscripts mark significant differences
between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).Kynurenine concentrations in blood were less than or equal to the detection limit
of 0.04 µg/ml in 31 out of 36 animals. The other animals showed blood
concentrations between 0.06 and 0.09 µg/ml (data not shown).
Hematology
There was a significant effect of time on the HCT value
(P < 0.001) (Table 5). Immediately after LPS
injection (0.5 h), HCT increased numerically and decreased thereafter until 4 h
p.i. At 48 h p.i. the HCT increased significantly once again
(P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between
HCT values of animals treated with LPS and animals without LPS treatment.
However, the HCT values of animals slaughtered at 0.5 and 48 h p.i. were
significantly higher compared with animals slaughtered between 2 and 24 h
p.i.
Table 5.
Hematocrit (HCT) and blood cell counts after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).
Time after LPS injection (h)
HCT (%)
Leucocytes (cells/µl)
Thrombocytes (cells/µl)
Lymphocytes (%)
Heterophilic granulocytes (%)
H/L ratio
Eosinophilic granulocytes (%)
Basophilic granulocytes [%]
Monocytes [%]
0
25.9ab
27361ab
10882
65.0ab
32.2ef
0.50d
0.5cd
2.0c
0.7abc
0.5
29.7a
13788bcd
12707
81.3a
6.8g
0.09d
4.7a
6.5ab
0.7abc
1
27.5ab
16906abcd
5321
68.5ab
20.5efg
0.32d
2.3b
6.8a
1.8ab
2
25.1b
4524d
8502
73.7ab
20.0efg
0.29d
0.7cd
3.7abc
2.0a
3
24.4b
3388d
3289
31.7de
65.2bcd
2.31cd
0.7cd
1.7c
0.8abc
4
23.4b
7886cd
2140
9.7ef
88.5ab
11.31ab
0.2d
1.3c
0.3bc
5
25.4b
20352abc
3525
6.3f
92.2a
16.81a
0.0d
0.5c
1.0abc
6
23.6b
22245abc
7402
13.0ef
85.0ab
7.55bc
0.2d
1.3c
0.5abc
8
24.8b
17587abcd
8015
24.3def
73.8abc
3.48cd
0.5cd
0.8c
0.5abc
12
26.3b
11669cd
3962
39.0cd
59.3cd
2.85cd
0.7cd
0.8c
0.2c
24
24.9b
21505abc
10615
52.5bc
42.0de
0.95d
1.8bc
3.0bc
0.7abc
48
29.9a
31391a
13252
77.5a
17.7fg
0.23d
1.8bc
2.2c
0.8abc
P Value
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.022
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.006
PSEM
0.8
2862
2354
4.6
4.6
1.12
0.3
0.7
0.3
H/L ratio: heterophilic granulocytes/lymphocyte ratio; PSEM: combined
standard error of means.
a,b,c,d,e,fDifferent superscripts mark significant
differences between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).
Hematocrit (HCT) and blood cell counts after LPS injection (means;
n = 3).H/L ratio: heterophilic granulocytes/lymphocyte ratio; PSEM: combined
standard error of means.a,b,c,d,e,fDifferent superscripts mark significant
differences between time points within a column
(P < 0.05).A time-dependent effect was also observed on total counts of leucocytes and
thrombocytes as well as on differentiated white blood cell populations
(P < 0.05).While total counts of thrombocytes of animals slaughtered before LPS injection
and animals slaughtered after LPS injection did not differ significantly
(P > 0.05), total counts of leucocytes were
significantly decreased in animals slaughtered 2, 3, 4 and 12 h p.i. compared
with animals slaughtered before LPS injection
(P < 0.05).The proportions of lymphocytes increased numerically 0.5 h p.i. and decreased
thereafter until 5 h p.i. before they increased once again. The proportions of
lymphocytes were significantly lower in animals slaughtered between 3 and 12 h
p.i. compared with the animals slaughtered 0 h p.i.
(P < 0.05). The proportions of heterophilic granulocytes
showed an opposite development compared with lymphocyte populations. Initially,
proportions of this cell population decreased significantly compared with
animals slaughtered before (0.5 h p.i., P = 0.026) and
increased thereafter until 5 h p.i. From 3 h p.i. onwards, the proportions of
heterophilic lymphocytes were significantly higher than proportions determined
before LPS injection (P = 0.01). After 5 h p.i. these
proportions decreased until the end of the experiment. From 24 h p.i. on,
differences between animals slaughtered before and after LPS injection were no
longer significant (P > 0.05). The opposite development of
lymphocytes and heterophilic granulocytes resulted in a significant increase of
the H/L ratio in animals slaughtered 4, 5 and 6 h p.i. compared with animals
slaughtered before LPS injection (P < 0.05).Proportions of eosinophilic and basophilic granulocytes increased significantly
until 0.5 and 1 h p.i., respectively (P < 0.05) and
decreased thereafter numerically until 5 h p.i. Subsequently, proportions of
these cell populations increased slightly without differing from the initial
value (P > 0.05). Proportions of monocytes in animals
slaughtered after LPS injection did not differ significantly compared with
animals slaughtered before LPS injection (P > 0.05).
However, the proportions in animals slaughtered 2 h p.i. were significantly
higher compared with proportions in animals slaughtered 4 or 12 h p.i.
(P < 0.05).
T and B cell subsets
Proportions of CD3+/CD4+/CD8– T cells in blood
and spleen were not affected by time (P > 0.05) (Figure 1). They differed
significantly between blood, spleen and CT (P < 0.05). In
general, this cell phenotype was most frequent in blood. However, before LPS
injection CD3+/CD4+/CD8– T cell subsets of CT
were similar to subsets in blood (P > 0.05). After LPS
injection the CD3+/CD4+/CD8– T cell subsets in
CT significantly decreased and did not reach the initial level during the entire
remaining experimental period (P < 0.01).
Figure 1.
T cell subsets after LPS injection in blood (●), spleen (□) and caecal
tonsils (▼) (means ± SE; n = 3).
*Significant differences of blood cells compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (**P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001); aSignificant
differences of cells of caecal tonsils compared with animals without LPS
injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;aaP < 0.01;
aaaP < 0.001). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.
T cell subsets after LPS injection in blood (●), spleen (□) and caecal
tonsils (▼) (means ± SE; n = 3).
*Significant differences of blood cells compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (**P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001); aSignificant
differences of cells of caecal tonsils compared with animals without LPS
injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;aaP < 0.01;
aaaP < 0.001). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.The CD3+/CD4-/CD8+ T cell subsets in considered
localizations were significantly affected by time
(P < 0.001) except for
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets in spleen
(P > 0.05). Lowest proportions of this cell population
which were also significantly lower compared with the proportions in other
considered localizations (P < 0.001) were found in blood.
Immediately after LPS injection, CD3+/CD4–/CD8+
T cell subsets in blood decreased until 5 h p.i. The
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets of animals
slaughtered between 3 and 6 h p.i. were significantly lower compared with the
animals slaughtered before LPS injection (P < 0.01). From 8
h p.i. on, CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets
reached the initial level. Interestingly,
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cells were less frequent
(minimum = 0.4% – maximum = 1.7%) in CT of animals without LPS treatment.
However, from 2 h p.i., the proportions of this cell population significantly
increased (P < 0.001) and reached the levels observed in
spleen. During the remaining experimental period the splenic
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets remained on
this level.CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ T cell subsets in all considered
localizations changed significantly over the entire experimental time
(P < 0.05). Proportions in blood peaked 5 h p.i.; in
spleen 2 h p.i. and in CT 8 h p.i. Significant differences compared with animals
slaughtered before LPS injection were only observed in blood of animals
slaughtered 5 and 6 h p.i. (P < 0.001).There was no time-dependent effect on
CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cell subsets in blood and
spleen (P > 0.05). However,
CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cell subsets in CT
differed significantly over the entire experimental time
(P = 0.011). At 0 h p.i. the proportions of this cell
population were 31.4 ± 2.8% (means ± SE). Animals slaughtered at 4, 6, 12 and 48
h p.i. showed significantly lower proportions of
CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells in CT
(P < 0.05).Highest proportions of Bu+ cells were detected in CT and lowest
proportions in blood (Figure
2). The proportions of Bu+ cells varied significantly over
the experimental time in blood and CT (P < 0.001) but not in
spleen (P > 0.05). Proportions of Bu+ cells
peaked in blood at 6 h p.i. However, there were no significant differences
between proportions of this population in animals slaughtered before LPS
injection and animals slaughtered after LPS injection. Initially, the
proportions of Bu+ cells in CT amounted on average to 94.5 ± 5.5%
(means ± SE). After LPS injection the proportions were markedly reduced over the
entire remaining experimental period. Bu+ subsets in CT of animals
slaughtered 2, 4, 6, 12 and 48 h p.i. differed significantly from subsets in CT
of animals slaughtered before LPS injection (P < 0.05).
Figure 2.
Proportions of Bu+ cells after LPS injection in blood (●),
spleen (□) and caecal tonsils (▼) (means ± SE; n = 3).
aSignificant differences of cells of caecal tonsils
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;
aP < 0.01). Dotted area indicates the
dark period.
Proportions of Bu+ cells after LPS injection in blood (●),
spleen (□) and caecal tonsils (▼) (means ± SE; n = 3).
aSignificant differences of cells of caecal tonsils
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;
aP < 0.01). Dotted area indicates the
dark period.
IL-1β and IL-10
The relative gene expression of IL-1β in PBLs and considered tissues differed
significantly over the entire experimental period (P < 0.05)
(Figure 3a and b).
While the relative gene expression in liver and CT peaked already at 2 h p.i.
that in PBLs peaked at 3 h p.i. and in spleen at 4 h p.i. The relative gene
expression in PBLs of animals slaughtered between 1 and 8 h p.i. was
significantly higher compared with the expression of animals slaughtered before
LPS injection (P < 0.05). While relative gene expression of
IL-1β in liver differed only 2, 4 and again at 48 h p.i. from that before LPS
injection (P < 0.05) the relative gene expression in spleen
increased significantly at 2 h p.i. and remained on a significantly higher level
until 12 h p.i. compared with the initial level
(P < 0.05).
Figure 3.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of IL-1β in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). *Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001). (b) Relative gene expression
levels of IL-1β in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils)
(means ± SE; n = 3). aSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in liver compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;
aaaP < 0.001).
bSignificant differences of gene expression levels in spleen
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(bP < 0.05;
bbP < 0.01;
bbbP < 0.001). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of IL-1β in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). *Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001). (b) Relative gene expression
levels of IL-1β in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils)
(means ± SE; n = 3). aSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in liver compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0)
(aP < 0.05;
aaaP < 0.001).
bSignificant differences of gene expression levels in spleen
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(bP < 0.05;
bbP < 0.01;
bbbP < 0.001). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.The relative gene expression of IL-1β in PBL was significantly negatively
correlated with the albumin concentration in blood (r = –0.494,
P = 0.002). Moreover, a significant negative correlation
was detected between the gene expression of IL-1β and blood tryptophan
concentrations (r = –0.613; P < 0.001).A time-dependent effect was detected on relative gene expression of IL-10 in PBLs
and considered tissues (P < 0.01) (Figure 4a and b). In all localizations
the IL-10 mRNA expression peaked at 2 h p.i. However, the expression at this
time was markedly higher in liver and spleen compared with the expression in
PBLs or CT. While the relative gene expression in liver was significantly higher
(P < 0.001) than the initial level only at 2 h p.i. the
expression in PBLs and spleen remained at a significantly higher level until 4 h
p.i. (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the relative gene expression
in spleen was significantly higher once again at 8 h p.i. compared with the
initial level (P = 0.027). The relative gene expression of
IL-10 in CT differed significantly over the entire experimental period; however,
there were no significant differences between animals slaughtered before or at
different time points after LPS injection (P > 0.05).
Significant positive correlations were noted between relative gene expression of
IL-1β and IL-10 in the various considered localizations (PBLs:
r = 0.645, P < 0.001; liver:
r = 0.648, P = 0.001; spleen:
r = 0.789, P < 0.001; CT:
r = 0.524, P = 0.010).
Figure 4.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of IL-10 in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3); **Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(P < 0.01). (b) Relative gene expression levels of
IL-10 in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils) (means ± SE;
n = 3); aSignificant differences of gene
expression levels in liver compared with animals without LPS injection
(time point 0) (P < 0.05). bSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (P < 0.05).
Dotted area indicates the dark period.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of IL-10 in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3); **Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(P < 0.01). (b) Relative gene expression levels of
IL-10 in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils) (means ± SE;
n = 3); aSignificant differences of gene
expression levels in liver compared with animals without LPS injection
(time point 0) (P < 0.05). bSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (P < 0.05).
Dotted area indicates the dark period.
TLR4
The relative gene expression of the TLR4 was significantly affected by time in
PBLs, liver and spleen (P < 0.01) and tended to be affected
by time in CT (P = 0.060) (Figure 5a and b). Concretely, the gene
expression in PBLs decreased numerically at 2 h p.i. and increased thereafter
until 4 h p.i. After the peak at 4 h p.i., the relative gene expression of TLR4
decreased until the end of the experimental period. However, there was no
significant difference between the TLR4 mRNA expression in PBLs of animals
slaughtered before and after LPS injection (P < 0.05). The
relative gene expression of the TLR4 in liver decreased until 4 h p.i. and
increased thereafter until 24 h p.i. The relative gene expression of animals
slaughtered 4 h p.i. was significantly lower (P = 0.006) and
the expression of animals slaughtered 24 h p.i. was significantly higher
(P = 0.019) than the relative gene expression of animals
slaughtered before LPS injection. The relative gene expression in spleen
increased numerically 2 h p.i. and decreased thereafter significantly compared
with the initial level (P = 0.007). After this drop the
relative gene expression increased until 8 h p.i. and remained constant
thereafter. A dropdown of the relative gene expression of the TLR4 in CT was
observed at 2 and 12 h p.i., which was not significant compared with the initial
level (P > 0.05). After the last drop, the relative gene
expression remained on a numerically lower level compared with the gene
expression of animals slaughtered before LPS injection.
Figure 5.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of TLR4 in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). (b) Relative gene expression levels of TLR4
in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils) (means ± SE;
n = 3). aSignificant differences of gene
expression levels in liver compared with animals without LPS injection
(time point 0) (aP < 0.05;
aaP < 0.01). bbSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (P < 0.01).
Dotted area indicates the dark period.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of TLR4 in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). (b) Relative gene expression levels of TLR4
in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼ caecal tonsils) (means ± SE;
n = 3). aSignificant differences of gene
expression levels in liver compared with animals without LPS injection
(time point 0) (aP < 0.05;
aaP < 0.01). bbSignificant
differences of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals
without LPS injection (time point 0) (P < 0.01).
Dotted area indicates the dark period.The expression of TLR4 in PBLs was significantly positively correlated with the
expression of IL-1β in blood (r = 0.395,
P = 0.017). Conversely, TLR4 mRNA expression in liver was
significantly negatively correlated with the expression of IL-1β in liver
(r = –0.552, P = 0.005). There was no
correlation between the relative gene expression of TLR4 and IL-1β in spleen and
CT (P > 0.05).
Inducible NO synthase and blood nitrite concentration
The relative gene expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in PBLs increased
immediately after LPS injection until 3 h p.i., decreased thereafter until 6 h
p.i. and remained constant until the end of the experiment (Figure 6). At 2 and 3 h p.i. the relative
gene expression of iNOS in PBLs was significantly higher compared with the
initial level (P < 0.05). The relative gene expression in
liver and spleen peaked at 2 h p.i. and remained significantly higher in spleen
until 4 h p.i. (P < 0.01) and in liver until 8 h p.i.
(P < 0.001) compared with animals slaughtered before LPS
injection. In contrast, the relative gene expression in CT was significantly
decreased at 4 h p.i. (P = 0.025). Thereafter, the expression
increased slightly and remained on a constant level below the initial level
subsequently.
Figure 6.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of iNOS in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). *Significant differences of gene expression
levels compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (b)
Relative gene expression levels of iNOS in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼
caecal tonsils) (means ± SE; n = 3);
aaaSignificant differences of gene expression levels in liver
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(P < 0.001). bSignificant differences
of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals without LPS
injection (time point 0) (bbP < 0.01;
bbbP < 0.001);
bSignificant differences of gene expression levels in caecal
tonsils compared with animals without LPS injection
(bP < 0.05). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.
(a) Relative gene expression levels of iNOS in PBLs (means ± SE;
n = 3). *Significant differences of gene expression
levels compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (b)
Relative gene expression levels of iNOS in tissues (◆ liver; □ spleen; ▼
caecal tonsils) (means ± SE; n = 3);
aaaSignificant differences of gene expression levels in liver
compared with animals without LPS injection (time point 0)
(P < 0.001). bSignificant differences
of gene expression levels in spleen compared with animals without LPS
injection (time point 0) (bbP < 0.01;
bbbP < 0.001);
bSignificant differences of gene expression levels in caecal
tonsils compared with animals without LPS injection
(bP < 0.05). Dotted area indicates
the dark period.Plasma nitrite concentrations peaked at 6 and 12 h p.i. and were significantly
higher than the initial nitrite concentration at 5, 6 and 12 h p.i.
(P < 0.05) (Figure 7). Furthermore, the nitrite
concentration tended to be higher at 8 h p.i. (P = 0.055).
Figure 7.
Plasma nitrite concentration after LPS injection (means ± SE;
n = 3); *Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0) ((*)
P < 0.1); *P < 0.05;
***P < 0.001). Dotted area indicates the dark
period.
Plasma nitrite concentration after LPS injection (means ± SE;
n = 3); *Significant differences compared with
animals without LPS injection (time point 0) ((*)
P < 0.1); *P < 0.05;
***P < 0.001). Dotted area indicates the dark
period.Ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) after LPS injection (means ± SE;
n = 3). Dotted area indicates the dark period.The iNOS mRNA expression in PBLs, liver, spleen and CT correlated significantly
with the IL-1β mRNA expression in the same localization (PBLs:
r = 0.565, P < 0.001; liver:
r = 0.802, P < 0.001; spleen:
r = 0.809, P < 0.001; CT:
r = 0.541, P = 0.008). The plasma
concentration of nitrite tended to correlate with the gene expression of IL-1β
in PBLs (r = 0.301, P = 0.074).Moreover, there was a significant correlation between liver iNOS mRNA expression
and liver TLR4 mRNA expression (r = –0.782;
P < 0.001) and between the plasma nitrite concentration and
the PBL TLR4 mRNA expression (r = 0.401;
P = 0.015).A significant correlation between iNOS mRNA expression in liver and blood Glc
concentration (r = 0.470; P = 0.020) as well
as between plasma nitrite concentrations and blood Glc concentration was
detected (r = 0.442; P = 0.007). PBL mRNA
expression of iNOS and blood Glc concentration did not correlate
(P > 0.05).
Ferric reducing capacity of plasma
There was a time-dependent effect on FRAP indicated by the Fe2+
concentration in plasma over the entire experimental period
(P = 0.001) (Figure 8). Immediately after LPS injection the
Fe2+ concentration increased slightly and decreased thereafter
until 2 h p.i. After 3 h p.i. until 6 h p.i. the Fe2+ concentration
increased. The concentration peaked at 48 h p.i. There was no significant
difference between animals slaughtered before or after LPS injection
(P > 0.05).A significant negative correlation was detected between the FRAP and the iNOS
mRNA expression in PBLs (r = –0.433;
P = 0.008) but not between FRAP and the plasma nitrite
concentration (P > 0.05).
Discussion
In order to examine the response of the innate immune system to dietary
interventions, it is important to know the kinetics of an acute phase response in
order to record most relevant endpoints and most indicative time points. As
high-resolute kinetics of an LPS-induced acute phase response in laying hens are
rarely described in the literature, in the present study clinical signs were
recorded frequently and a number of endpoints closely associated with the acute
phase response were determined.The used dosage of intramuscularly administered LPS proved adequate to induce a
characteristic febrile response and sickness behavior in different genotypes of
layer pullets and cockerels in previous studies by Lieboldt et al.[2],[6] In the present study, laying hens treated with LPS showed clinical signs
indicative of an acute phase response in mammals and birds caused by endotoxins,
such as sickness behavior, a decrease in the negative acute phase-protein albumin, a
reduction in blood calcium concentration, leucopenia, lymphopenia, and an increase
in heterophilic granulocytes as well as an increase in relative gene expression of
the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β.[3],[13] However, the mentioned alterations were not accompanied by a fever response,
which is normally mediated by IL-1β during acute phase response.[3]Similar to the previous studies of Lieboldt et al.,[2],[6] a drop in body temperature was observed after injection of LPS. However, this
drop occurred markedly earlier compared with the previous cited studies, and
regressed markedly faster. The development of an elevated body temperature after
this initial drop, as described by Lieboldt et al.,[2,6] was not observed. In previous
studies, it was pointed out that the body temperature response to LPS depends on
dosage, site of injection and genotype.[2],[5],[6] In the present study, the application of LPS and genotype corresponded to the
conditions used in the studies of Lieboldt et al.[2],[6] However, a possible explanation for the markedly lower febrile response could
be the higher age of animals used in the present study. In studies with broiler
chickens, De Boever et al.[14] clearly demonstrated that the body temperature response to LPS decreased with
increasing age of birds. Although body temperature was regressed 2 h p.i., the
typical clinical symptoms due to LPS administration, as already described in studies
by Xie et al.[4] and Lieboldt et al.,[6] persisted until 6.45 h p.i. Studies by Johnson et al.[5] also showed that the behavioral response to LPS lasted longer than the
febrile response of animals, which indicates, as also emphasized by Johnson et al.[5], that the development of the behavioral and the pyrogenic response is
mediated differently.Cytokines such as IL-1β trigger the acute phase response, which includes the
up-regulation of positive acute phase proteins in liver.[3] As a consequence, the synthesis of negative acute phase proteins decreases.[3] This aspect explains the reduction of blood albumin concentration within 3–8
h p.i. The significant negative correlation between the relative gene expression of
IL-1β and the concentration of albumin in blood and PBLs supports the association
between this pro-inflammatory cytokine and the acute phase response.The positive correlation between relative gene expression of IL-1β and iNOS, which is
expressed primarily by macrophages, substantiated the key role of IL-1β as an
inducer of NO production.[3] The increase in the corresponding plasma nitrite concentration started later
and peaked 2 h later than the increase in the relative gene expression of iNOS in
PBLs. While the gene expression of iNOS was completely reversed at 6 h p.i., long
lasting effects on plasma nitrite concentrations were shown after LPS injection that
remained at a significantly higher value until 12 h p.i.IL-10 is able to inhibit the synthesis of IL-1β.[15] The almost simultaneous up-regulation of IL-1β and IL-10 protects the animal
from overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines.[15] Approximately 2 h after the reduction of IL-10 mRNA expression, the IL-1β
mRNA expression also decreased. In a study by Munyaka et al.,[16] a simultaneous up-regulation of IL-1β and IL-10 was also observed in spleen
and CT of LPS-treated laying hens. Interestingly, the mRNA expression of IL-1β was
markedly higher in PBLs than in liver, but the mRNA expression of IL-10 was markedly
higher in liver compared with PBLs. In contrast to Yang et al.,[17] who observed increased IL-1 expression in PBMCs 24 h p.i., no long lasting
effects on IL-1β mRNA expression were noted in the present study in the considered
localizations except for the expression in liver. According to Leshchinsky and Klasing,[18] it is assumed that the mRNA expression level of the cytokines correlated with
a boost of their biological activity in the considered localizations.Hypoglycemia after LPS administration, which was reported in a study by Xie et al.,[4] was not noted in the present experiment. Conversely, lower Glc concentrations
were detected in animals slaughtered before LPS injection, and in animals
slaughtered 24 and 48 h p.i. These findings could be related with the lower feed
intake of these animals resulting from the preceding dark period, and an increase of
feed intake the longer the illumination period. Nevertheless, the marked increases
of Glc concentrations from 0 to 0.5 h p.i. might also indicate an LPS-related effect
on this parameter. It was reported that the administration of LPS results in an
increase in hepatic gluconeogenesis, which can enhance blood Glc concentrations.[19],[20] In recently published studies in dairy cows, Kvidera et al.[21] suggested hepatic glycogenolysis as the primary supporter of the increased
Glc concentrations in the blood of cows after LPS treatment. Moreover, it was
described that LPS induce insulin resistance, which in turn results in hyperglycemia
in rats.[20] To test possible insulin resistance due to LPS in laying hens in further
studies, insulin concentrations in blood also have to be considered. Sugita et al.[20] showed clear relationships between endotoxin-induced hyperglycemia and
hepatic insulin resistance as well as the protein expression of iNOS. The
significant correlations between blood Glc concentrations and iNOS mRNA expression
in liver as well as the plasma nitrite concentration might indicate similar
relationships in LPS-treated laying hens in the present study.Xie et al.[4] reported that LPS induces diuresis in broiler chickens. It is known that
diuresis increases phosphorus excretion,[22] which might explain the numerical decrease in blood phosphorus concentrations
from 2 h p.i. In studies with horses, Toribio et al.[23] found that hypophosphatemia was accompanied by hyperphosphaturia. However, in
agreement with the findings of Xie et al.,[4] the phosphorus level increased markedly 12 h p.i. in the present study. Xie
et al. [4] ascribed this increase to impaired kidney function due to the acute phase
response.In the present study, blood calcium concentrations seemed to be reduced from 3 h p.i.
In general, a considerable proportion of the calcium found in the body is bound to
albumin. Therefore, the lower calcium concentration could be related to the
decreasing albumin concentration in blood. This suggestion was supported by the
significant positive correlation between these two parameters. In studies with pigs
and horses, LPS also reduced calcium concentration in the blood.[23],[24] Carlstedt et al.[24] suggested that decreases of blood calcium concentration could be related, in
part, with the translocation of albumin in the extracellular space induced by
vascular permeabilisation due to endotoxemia.Tryptophan plays a key role in the regulation of the immune response during
inflammation. It is known that the enzyme indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 catalyzes
tryptophan degradation to N-formylkynurenine, which can be
subsequently converted into kynurenine.[25] Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, or IL-1 and -2 induce the
activity of this enzyme.[25] The significant negative correlation between plasma tryptophan levels and
IL-1β in the current study might indicate an LPS-induced degradation of tryptophan
by activation of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1. An indicator for the activity of
this enzyme is an increase of the kynurenine/tryptophan ratio.[25] However, making reliable conclusions regarding this ratio was not possible in
the present study because of the very low blood kynurenine levels. In studies with
pigs, LPS also reduced plasma tryptophan levels, accompanied by increases in
kynurenine levels and the kynurenine/tryptophan ratio.[26] In this latter study, the LPS-induced activation of indoleamine 2,3
dioxygenase was proven.Leucopenia, which became significant 2–4 h p.i. and 12 h p.i. appeared to be based on
the leucocyte extravasation.[13] A similar effect on the development of thrombocyte counts after LPS injection
as shown in the present study was also detected in mice.[27] Shibazaki et al.[27] clearly showed that these cells will be translocated to lungs, liver and
spleen due to LPS injection. Transient enhancement of thrombocytes at 2, 6 and 8 h
p.i. might be the result of the recruitment from lungs and bone marrow by
homeostatic signals, as suggested by Wang et al.[13] In agreement with the results of Lieboldt et al.,[2] a numerical decrease of eosinophilic and basophilic granulocyte proportions
was observed 4 and 8 h p.i.; however, in the present study, immediately after LPS
injection, the amount of these cells increased before granulocyte proportions
decreased. A similar development of basophilic granulocytes was also shown iby Wang et al.[13] LPS injection-associated monocytosis as described iby Lieboldt et al.[2] was not observed in the present study.The significant reduction of heterophilic granulocytes in blood could be an
indication that these cells migrate already at a very early stage to the site of LPS
injection. Chemotaxis of avian heterophilic granulocytes for endotoxins is known.[28] Thereafter, strong recruitment from bone marrow or a marginated pool seemed
to follow, which peaked 5 h p.i. and continued until 12 h p.i. In general this
recruitment is explainable by the high importance of this cell type in the
inflammatory response because of its key functions in clearance of microbial agents
by phagocytosis and antimicrobial activities which appear to be stimulated by
cytokines and chemokines.[28] In accordance with studies by Gross and Siegel,[29] Lieboldt et al.[2] and Munyaka et al.,[30] LPS treatment resulted in increases of the H/L ratio, which is a reliable
stress indicator in chicken.[29] Also in previous studies, H/L ratios >1.0 were detected in chickens after
LPS injection. According to the results of the current study, the effect of LPS on
lymphocytes and heterophilic granulocytes, as well as the H/L ratio, seemed to be
more severe than presented in previous studies. It appears that the period between 4
and 6 h p.i. is much more stressful, which was not considered in previous
studies.Lieboldt et al.[6] observed changes in relative organ masses of spleen; these authors associated
the alteration in organ mass with a higher splenic production of immune mediators
and cells due to LPS treatment.In contrast to other organs, the T and B cell subsets in spleen seemed to be stable
against LPS treatment, except for CD3+/CD4+/CD8+
cells. Although Munyaka et al.[30] exposed laying hens to higher amounts of LPS, they also found no effects on T
cell subsets in spleen but there were effects on T cell subsets in blood. Also in
previous studies with older laying hens, no effects of LPS were found on splenic T
cell subsets.[16]In the present study, a strong decrease of
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ in blood was observed. In
contrast, CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets of CT
simultaneously increased markedly. This aspect clearly indicated the migration of T
cells from the circulation in secondary lymphoid organs or other related immune
organs, which was already suggested by Munyaka et al.[16],[30] Furthermore, in the present study, a shift from T-helper cells
(CD3+/CD4+/CD8– T cells) in favor of
T-cytotoxic cells (CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cells) was
shown in CT, which was not reversed until the end of the study. Cytotoxic T cells
are able to attack directly pathogens. Therefore, a migration and enhancement of
these cells in CT could be important for the resolution of inflammation. Also the
reduction of double negative T cells could be related with the increase in
CD3+/CD4–/CD8+ T cell subsets in CT. In
contrast, CD4/CD8 double-positive-stained T cells, which are considered as specific
memory cells and protective and immune-regulatory functions,[31] increased significantly in blood and slightly in CT. In contrast to the
results of Wang et al.,[13] no long lasting effects up to 48 h p.i. on T cell subsets in blood were
shown. All effects on T cell subsets appeared to be reversed at 8 h p.i. except for
T cell subsets of CT. In the present study, a pronounced and long lasting decrease
in Bu+ subsets in CT was observed after LPS injection. Similar effects
were shown in previous studies of Tan et al.[32] in spleen of broiler chickens. These latter authors suggested a higher
production of H2O2 by macrophages as a reason for the
decreasing effect on Bu+ subsets in the spleen. In the present study, no
effects on splenic Bu+ subsets were detected; however, similar effects
could be possible in CT.It is known that, in cases of bacterial infection, LPS recognition is mediated via
TLR4, which interacts with the LPS receptor CD14 and mediates the activation of
macrophages in a time- and tissue-dependent manner.[33],[34] In the present study, intramuscular LPS injection seemed to influence the
TLR4 in all considered locations. Interestingly, while TLR4 expression was
down-regulated at an early stage after LPS injection and peaked at 4 h p.i. in PBLs,
expression was significantly down-regulated in liver and spleen at 4 h p.i. Nomura et al.[35] showed that LPS stimulation of murine macrophages can result in a transient
reduction in TLR4 mRNA expression. Furthermore, decreased TLR4 expression could be
an indication of the development of LPS tolerance. LPS tolerances were especially
shown after repeated LPS treatment of murine macrophages in birds.[35],[36] Murine macrophages pre-treated with LPS also showed a marked decrease in mRNA
expression of TLR4.[35] However, Nomura et al.[35] emphasized that the TLR4 surface expression of macrophages is a more reliable
indicator for LPS tolerance than mRNA expression. The development of LPS tolerance
may also be a further explanation for the lack of a febrile response, which is known
to be abolished after tolerance development in birds.[36] A significant up-regulation of TLR4 was only noted at 24 h p.i. in liver.
Up-regulating effects of LPS on TLR4 mRNA expression after 24 h p.i. were also shown
by Tan et al.[32] However, these authors reported effects in spleen and CT, locations that were
not significantly affected in the present study. In contrast to the present study,
Munyaka et al.[16] showed that expression of TLR4 was significantly up-regulated 4 h p.i. in
spleen after LPS injection, and accompanied with the up-regulation of the relative
gene expression of IL-1β. In the present study, there was no significant correlation
between the expression of TLR4 and the expression of IL-1β in spleen, but a
significant positive correlation was detected in PBLs, and a negative correlation
between both parameters in liver. Dil and Qureshi[34] suggested a strong relationship between TLR4 and iNOS expression of
macrophages. Indeed correlations between the gene expression of TLR4 and iNOS were
detected only in liver. However, this correlation was significantly negative, which
resulted from the opposite kinetics of both parameters. In general, TLR4 signaling
results in NF-κB activation, which in turn is essential for the expression of iNOS.[34],[37],[38] Therefore, in further studies, the expression of NF-κB should also be
considered. In PBLs, no correlation between the gene expressions of TLR4 and iNOS
was shown, but a positive correlation was seen between relative gene expression of
TLR4 and plasma nitrite concentration.The high production of iNOS contributed to a high release of NO, as indicated by the
stable end product nitrite in the present study. However, it is also known that NO,
in combination with the superoxide anion, can lead to the formation of peroxynitrite
anion and subsequently to the formation of hydroxyl radicals.[39],[40] The production of these reactive oxygen species due to LPS-mediated iNOS
induction could be an explanation for the reduction of antioxidants in circulation,
which was indicated by FRAP in the present study. This hypothesis is supported by
the negative correlation between FRAP and iNOS mRNA expression in blood.In the present study did not include an control group that was treated with NaCl or
PBS. However, other studies have shown that there are no obvious time-dependent
effects on thrombocyte counts, white blood cell counts, differentiated blood cells,
T and B cell subsets and plasma nitrite concentrations.[13],[41] Furthermore, in previous studies most parameters known to be influenced by
the circadian rhythm, such as body temperature or albumin, show significant changes
only in dark periods.[6],[42] Previous studies have also shown that plasma concentrations of phosphorus and
calcium increase until 12 and 16 h post oviposition.[43] All animals laid an egg immediately before LPS injection or within the 12 h
before slaughtering. Therefore, decreases in calcium and phosphorus measured in the
present study are not a result of the egg production rhythm, and appeared to be
related to the injection of LPS. An influence of this rhythm on the result of the
measurements after 24 h and 48 h p.i. cannot be fully excluded. With regard to
proven time-indecencies during the daily period of different parameters, and in
comparison to results of previous studies, it is suggested that most of the present
results were related directly to the injection of LPS.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the intramuscular administration of LPS to older laying hens (7th
laying mo) induced alterations such as sickness behaviour, a decrease in the
anti-acute phase protein albumin, a reduction of calcium and phosphorus
concentration in blood, leucopenia, lymphopenia, heterophilia and increases of IL-1β
mRNA expression, which are associated with acute phase response in mammalians and
birds; however, no fever response. Possibly, the development of more efficient
mechanisms to overcome inflammation or tolerance against LPS by the animals, due to
their higher age, reduced the febrile response. The main response time of the
mentioned alterations due to LPS appears to contain the period between 2 and 8 h
p.i. According to the H/L ratio, the most stressful period after LPS injection in
older laying hensis 5 h p.i. However, alterations in T and B cell subsets in CT as
well as IL-1β and TLR4 mRNA expression in liver and plasma nitrite concentrations
seemed to be affected for a longer period.
Authors: F Nomura; S Akashi; Y Sakao; S Sato; T Kawai; M Matsumoto; K Nakanishi; M Kimoto; K Miyake; K Takeda; S Akira Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422