| Literature DB >> 30893916 |
Atsushi Ido1, Atsushi Hashizume2, Takashi Ohta3, Takayuki Takahashi4, Chiemi Miura5,6, Takeshi Miura7.
Abstract
Yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae are a potential alternative animal protein source for sustainable aquaculture. However, reports on the successful complete substitution of fish meal with yellow mealworm larvae in an aquaculture diet have been limited. In this study, we conducted a feeding trial with red seabream (Pagrus major) being fed diets with partial or complete replacement of fish meal with yellow mealworm larvae defatted with a hexane⁻ethanol solution. Feed intake in red seabream increased in accordance with yellow mealworm larvae inclusion, and diets including 65% defatted mealworm larvae (complete replacement of fish meal) showed significant growth promotion. The addition of the oil fraction from mealworm larvae to diets resulted in growth reduction, despite meeting the nutritional requirements of red seabream. Moreover, the survival rate of red seabreams fed diets with partial replacement of fish meal with mealworm larvae was significantly higher in a challenge test with pathogenic Edwardsiella tarda bacteria. The present study demonstrated that yellow mealworm larvae are not merely an alternative animal protein, but have potential as functional feed ingredients for aquaculture production.Entities:
Keywords: Edwardsiella tarda; fish meal replacement; red seabream; yellow mealworm
Year: 2019 PMID: 30893916 PMCID: PMC6466227 DOI: 10.3390/ani9030100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Formulation, proximate composition, and amino acid composition of the diets fed to red seabream for the growth test for 4 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fish meal | 65.00 | 40.00 | 25.00 | ||
| DMW-1 | 25.00 | 40.00 | 65.00 | 65.00 | |
| Fish oil | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | |
| Mealworm oil | 5.16 | ||||
| DHA | 1.84 | ||||
| Starch | 12.00 | 14.00 | 15.00 | 17.00 | 17.00 |
| Corn gluten meal | 8.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | ||
| Taurine | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Vitamin mix | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Mineral mix | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Choline chloride | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Vitamin C derivatives | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| NaH2PO4 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| KH2PO4 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Calcium lactate | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
|
| |||||
| Crude Protein | 54.7 | 54.1 | 53.0 | 52.2 | 52.4 |
| Crude fat | 11.4 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Ash | 13.6 | 10.6 | 8.5 | 5.8 | 6.2 |
|
| |||||
| Arg | 6.2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| His | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Ile | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Leu | 9.0 | 8.6 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Lys | 7.5 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Met + Cys | 4.6 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Phe | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Thr | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Trp + Tyr | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Val | 5.1 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Abbreviations: DMW-1, defatted mealworm larvae with hexane and ethanol solvent; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid.a Control diet including 65% fish meal (FM).b Test diet including 25% DMW-1 (38% replacement of FM in the control diet).c Test diet including 40% DMW-1 (62% replacement of FM in the control diet).d Test diet including 65% DMW-1 (100% replacement of FM in the control diet). e Test diet including 65% DMW-1 (100% replacement of FM in the control diet), and the oil fraction of mealworm larvae (MO) was added. DHA was supplemented to be equivalent in n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA) content to the 65% MW diet.f Proximate composition on dry matter basis. Values are reported as means of duplicate analysis.g The amounts of amino acids in the diets were calculated using the amino acid profiles in FM, DMW-1 (Table 3), and corn gluten meal [19].
Formulation of the diets fed to red seabream for the challenge test for 8 weeks.
| Ingredients (%) | Control a | 5% MW b | 10% MW c |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish meal | 50.00 | 45.00 | 40.00 |
| DMW-2 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 10.00 |
| Fish oil | 6.00 | 6.25 | 6.50 |
| Starch | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Wheat meal | 11.20 | 10.85 | 10.50 |
| Soybean meal | 16.00 | 16.00 | 16.00 |
| Corn gluten meal | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
| Taurine | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.20 |
| Vitamin mix | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Mineral mix | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Choline chloride | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Vitamin C derivatives | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| KH2PO4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Abbreviations: DMW-2, defatted mealworm larvae produced in Shangdong, China, obtained from Shintoa Corporation.a Control diet including 50% fish meal.b Test diet including 5% DMW-1 (10% replacement of FM in the control diet). c Test diet including 10% DMW-1 (20% replacement of FM in the control diet).
Proximate compositions and amino acid compositions of defatted mealworm larvae (DMW-1 and DMW-2) and fish meal for the experimental diets.
| Proximate Compositions and Amino Acid Compositions | DMW-1 | DMW-2 | FM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proximate composition (% on a dry matter basis) a | |||
| Crude protein | 75.3 | 76.5 | 71.3 |
| Crude fat | 5.6 | 5.3 | 9.8 |
| Ash | 5.1 | 11.7 | 16.4 |
| Amino acids (% total amino acids) | |||
| Ala | 7.4 | 5.8 | 7.0 |
| Arg | 5.7 | 7.0 | 6.5 |
| Asp | 8.7 | 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Cys | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 |
| Glu | 12.8 | 13.4 | 13.2 |
| Gly | 5.6 | 6.8 | 7.7 |
| His | 3.2 | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| Ile | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
| Leu | 7.8 | 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Lys | 5.9 | 7.0 | 8.3 |
| Met | 1.3 | 1.6 | 3.1 |
| Phe | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Pro | 7.4 | 6.2 | 5.0 |
| Ser | 4.9 | 7.0 | 4.3 |
| Thr | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Trp | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Tyr | 7.6 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Val | 6.6 | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Taurine (mg/g dry matter) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.5 |
Abbreviations: DMW-1, defatted mealworm larvae with hexane and ethanol solvent; DMW-2, defatted mealworm larvae produced in Shangdong, China, obtained from Shintoa Corporation. FM, fish meal obtained from Shintoa Corporation. Values of amino acids in FM were based on the FM in the Standard Table of Feed Composition in Japan [25]. a Proximate composition on a dry matter basis. Values are reported as means of duplicate analysis.
Fatty acid compositions in mealworm larvae and fish oil for the experimental diets.
| Components (% Fatty Acids) | Dried Mealworm Larvae a | Fish Oil |
|---|---|---|
| Saturated fatty acid | ||
| 12:0 | 0.3 | 4.1 |
| 14:0 | 2.8 | - |
| 15:0 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| 16:0 | 15.5 | 15.6 |
| 17:0 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| 18:0 | 2.4 | 3.6 |
| 20:0 | - | 0.3 |
| 22:0 | - | - |
| Total | 21.4 | 24.8 |
| Monounsaturated fatty acid | ||
| 14:1 | - | - |
| 16:1 | 1.9 | 5.0 |
| 17:1 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| 18:1 | 35.7 | 19.4 |
| 20:1 | - | 5.2 |
| 22:1 | - | 5.0 |
| 24:1 | - | 0.6 |
| Total | 37.7 | 35.7 |
| Polyunsaturated fatty acid | ||
| ω-3 fatty acid | ||
| 18:3n−3 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 20:3n−3 | - | 0.2 |
| 20:4n−3 | - | 0.7 |
| 20:5n−3 | - | 7.5 |
| 21:5n−3 | - | 0.3 |
| 22:5n−3 | - | 1.9 |
| 22:6n−3 | - | 15.7 |
| Total | 1.7 | 27.3 |
| ω-6 fatty acid | ||
| 18:2n−6 | 35.7 | 2.8 |
| 20:2n−6 | - | 0.3 |
| 20:3n−6 | - | 0.2 |
| 20:4n−6 | - | 1.1 |
| 22:5n−6 | - | 0.6 |
| Total | 35.7 | 5.0 |
| Others | ||
| 16:2 | - | 0.3 |
| 16:3 | - | 0.2 |
| 16:4 | - | 0.3 |
| Total | - | 0.8 |
| Not identified | 1.6 | 4.3 |
Lower limit of quantification. a Dried mealworm larvae before defatting to DMW-1 obtained from Shintoa Corporation.Lower limit of quantitation: 1 mg/g.
Figure 1Growth performance of red seabream fed diets with a partial or complete replacement of FM with DMW-1 for a period of 4 weeks. Fork length gain (a) and body weight gain (b) at 4 weeks in the feeding trial. Values are means with their standard error represented by vertical bars [n = 29 in 65% FM, 31 in 25% MW, 32 in 40% MW, 32 in 65% MW, and 30 in 65% MW and the oil fraction of mealworm larvae (65% MW + MO)]. Different letters (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences according to the Steel–Dwass multiple comparison tests as a post hoc test after a Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05).
Initial fork length and body weight, fork length and body weight gain, SGR, feed intake, FCR, and survival rate of red seabream fed diets with a partial or complete replacement of FM with DMW-1 for a period of 4 weeks.
| Parameters | 65% FM | 25% MW | 40% MW | 65% MW | 65% MW+ MO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29 | 31 | 32 | 32 | 30 |
| Initial FL (cm) | 10.3 (10.1, 10.5) a | 10.3 (10.1, 10.4) a | 10.4 (10.2, 10.6) a | 10.4 (10.2, 10.6) a | 10.2 (10.0, 10.4) a |
| FL gain (cm) | 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) a | 1.5 (1.4, 1.7) b | 1.5 (1.4, 1.6) b | 1.6 (1.5, 1.6) b | 1.6 (1.4, 1.7) b |
| Initial BW (g) | 24.3 (22.8, 25.8) a | 24.4 (23.2, 25.6) a | 25.9 (24.5, 27.3) a | 25.4 (24.0, 26.7) a | 24.5 (23.0, 26.0) a |
| BW gain (g) | 7.2 (5.6, 8.9) a | 10.4 (8.9, 11.9) b | 11.8 (10.7, 13.0) b, c | 12.8 (12.0, 13.5) c | 10.4 (9.5, 11.2) a, b |
| FL gain rate (%) | 10.7 (9.2, 12.2) a | 14.7 (13.2, 16.2) b | 14.8 (13.6, 15.9) b | 15.1 (14.3, 15.9) b | 15.2 (14.1, 16.4) b |
| BW gain rate (%) | 26.9 (20.9, 32.8) a | 37.9 (32.7, 43.2) b, c | 39.2 (35.8, 42.5) b, c | 42.3 (40.2, 44.3) c | 36.6 (32.7, 40.6) a, b |
| SGR (% day-1) | 0.89 (0.69, 1.10) a | 1.27 (1.08, 1.46) b, c | 1.34 (1.23, 1.46) b, c | 1.46 (1.39, 1.54) c | 1.27 (1.16, 1.36) a, b |
| Feed intake (g) | 8.5 | 11.2 | 13.8 | 14.6 | 12.2 |
| FCR | 1.17 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.18 |
| Survival rate (%) | 90.6 | 96.9 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 93.8 |
Abbreviations: FL, fork length; BW, body weight; SGR, specific growth rate; FCR, feed conversion ratio. Data are represented by means (upper limit, lower limit of 95% confidential interval). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to the Steel–Dwass multiple comparison test as a post hoc test after a Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Survival rates of red seabream after infection with Edwardsiella tarda. Control diet group (X mark), 5% MW diet group (filled diamond), and 10% MW diet group (open square). The asterisk * indicates statistically significant differences compared with the control group using a log rank test with a Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05).