Room Temperature Synthesis of V-Doped TiO₂ and Its Photocatalytic Activity in the Removal of Caffeine under UV Irradiation.

In this work, the influence of simple acids in the room temperature sol-gel synthesis of TiO₂ was investigated and the efficiency of prepared photocatalysts was evaluated in the removal of caffeine. To improve the photoactivity of TiO₂, vanadium-doped TiO₂ (VTiO₂) samples were obtained starting from different amount of vanadyl sulphate as a dopant source. The samples were centrifuged, washed and finally dried at room temperature, and no calcination step was carried out. The prepared photocatalysts were characterized by different techniques (X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), specific surface area (SSA), ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS) and Raman). VTiO₂ photocatalysts were tested in the photocatalytic removal of aqueous solutions containing caffeine. The photocatalytic tests were carried out in a recirculating batch cylindrical photoreactor irradiated by a UV LEDs strip (nominal power of 12 W and wavelength emission peak at about 365 nm) surrounding the external surface of the reactor. The optimized VTiO₂ photocatalyst was able to reach a caffeine degradation of about 96% after 360 min of UV light irradiation with a total organic carbon (TOC) removal of 72%.

1. Introduction

The design of nanomaterials is a critical issue for industrial applications and their preparation methods largely affect the efficacy of nanotechnology and their application. Among oxide nanomaterials, TiO2 is used in a wide range of common and high-tech applications due to its moderate price, chemical stability, non-toxicity, biocompatibility and efficient photocatalytic properties [1]. It was reported that the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 depends on crystal size, specific surface area, crystallinity and absorption properties [2]. Generally, among the various crystalline phases of titania, anatase shows a better photocatalytic activity [3]. However, it is well known that anatase TiO2, with a small fraction of rutile or brookite phase, showed enhanced photocatalytic activity compared to pure anatase TiO2 due to the improved electron and hole separation [4]. In addition, some papers report that anatase-brookite composites were more efficient than anatase-rutile TiO2 for the photodegradation of a wide range of organic pollutants [5].

There are several methods for the synthesis of titania and titania based nanomaterials, such as sol-gel method [6], hydrothermal method, chemical vapour deposition (CVD), direct oxidation and microwave methods [7]. Unfortunately, these methods require organic solvents, corrosive chemicals and a high amount of energy to remove the organics used in the preparation of the colloidal suspensions. For this reason, in recent years, efforts have been made to produce titania based nanomaterials through chemical routes, which are less energy consuming and do not require the use of solvents [8].

Several works [9] have been carried out for modifying the sol–gel preparation of crystalline TiO2 in acidic aqueous solution at a low temperature (about 50 °C–100 °C), but the photocatalytic activity is generally very low. One method for increasing the activity could be the doping of TiO2 structure [10] with metal ions (such as Fe, Cu, Ni, V) [11] that can bring to defects in the semiconductor lattice, increasing the photocatalytic efficiency. A recent paper reports that vanadium doping TiO2 provides a potentially promising strategy to improve the properties of photocatalytic materials [1,12]. Caffeine was chosen as model pollutant since it is a psychoactive molecule consumed both for beverages and for pharmaceuticals and personal care products. This pollutant has been detected in natural water in many countries and it is considered an emerging pollutant [13]. Caffeine removal by means of advanced oxidation processes are already shown in the literature [14,15,16]. However, to our knowledge, papers concerning the photocatalytic degradation of this pollutant using photocatalysts prepared at room temperature are still scarce.

For these reasons, in this paper the effects of the vanadium amount in V doped TiO2 photocatalysts prepared at room temperature by sol-gel procedure were investigated, and the photocatalytic activity of the samples was studied in the degradation of caffeine under UV irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of TiO2 and V-Doped TiO2 Photocatalysts

The samples named TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN were prepared by adding 5 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) (Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l., Milan, Italy, 98%) dropwise into 100 mL of bi-distilled water containing 10 mL of acetic acid (glacial) or 0.1 mL of nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l., Milan, Italy, 99.8%), respectively. The suspension was vigorously stirred at room temperature (25 °C) for 24 h. Finally, the precipitate was washed with distillate water and then centrifuged. The precipitate was dried at room temperature for 48 h and stored.

The VTiO2 samples were obtained starting from different amounts of vanadyl sulphate (0.5, 1 and 5 mg) as a dopant source. In particular, vanadyl sulphate was dispersed in 100 mL of bi-distilled water containing 0.1 mL of nitric acid and then 5 mL of TTIP was added dropwise. The obtained solid phases were decanted and separated, washed with distillate water and then centrifuged for the separation. Finally, the obtained powders were dried at room temperature for 48 h. The nominal content of VTiO2 in the final samples was reported in Table 1 in terms of V/Ti molar ratio and crystal phase (A = anatase, B = brookite).

Table 1

Summary of physicochemical properties of TiO2 and VTiO2 samples.

No.	V/TiMolar Ratio	CrystalPhase	Crystallite Size,[nm]	Specific Surface Area,[m2/g]	Band Gap Energy,[eV]
TiO2 AA	-	A	6.93	326	3.3
TiO2 AN	-	A/B	5.23	333	3.2
0.5VTiO2	1.84 × 10−4	A/B	4.63	350	3.1
1VTiO2	3.67 × 10−4	A/B	5.21	219	3.1
5VTiO2	1.84 × 10−3	A/B	5.98	209	3.1

The physical-chemical characterization of the catalysts has been carried out by means of X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) performed with an X-ray micro-diffractometer Rigaku D-max-RAPID (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Laser Raman spectra were obtained at room temperature with a Dispersive MicroRaman (Invia, Renishaw, Gloucestershire, UK), equipped with a 514 nm laser, in the range 100–800 cm−1 Raman shift.

The Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) specific surface area (SSA) of the catalysts was obtained from the dynamic N2 adsorption measurement at −196 °C, using a Costech Sorptometer 1042 instrument, after a pre-treatment of the samples at 35 °C for 180 min in He flow. The ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-Vis DRS) were acquired using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) using a RSA-PE-20 reflectance spectroscopy accessory (Labsphere Inc., North Sutton, NH, USA). The band gap values were estimated through the Kubelka-Munk function (KM) (which is proportional to the absorption of radiation) and by plotting (KM × hν)2 as a function of hν and evaluating the intercepts on the x-axis of the linear part of the obtained curves.

2.2. Photocatalytic Tests

Caffeine (CAF) solutions, at initial concentration equal to 25 mg L−1, were prepared by adding 25 mg in 1 L of distilled water.

The photocatalytic tests were performed with a pyrex cylindrical photoreactor (internal diameter, ID = 2.5 cm) equipped with an air distributor device (air flowrate, Qair = 150 cm3 min−1) and magnetic stirrer to maintain the photocatalyst suspended in the aqueous solution. A UV-LED strip (nominal power 12 W, LED lightinghut) emitting at 365 nm, was used as light source. A volume of CAF solution equal to 100 mL with a catalyst dosage of 3 g L−1 was employed for the photocatalytic activity tests.

The LED strip was positioned in contact with the external body of the photoreactor (special glassware on own design realized by Microglass Heim s.r.l., Naples, Italy). Before the irradiation, the suspension was left in dark for 120 min to provide an adsorption/desorption equilibrium on the photocatalyst surface and, after this step, the photocatalytic test began under UV light irradiation up to 360 min.

During the tests, 2 mL of aqueous suspension were withdrawn and centrifuged to remove the catalyst powders to determine the residual CAF concentration at 272 nm by a Perkin Elmer UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The total organic carbon (TOC) contained in a fixed volume of the solution was measured by the high temperature combustion method on a catalyst (Pt-Al2O3) in a tubular flow micro-reactor which operated at 680 °C. The solution was injected in the catalytic reactor fed with air to oxidize the organic carbon into CO2, whose concentration in the gas-phase was monitored by a continuous analyzer (Uras 14, ABB Italia, Milano, Italy) [17].

3. Results

3.1. Characterization

The Raman spectra of the sample are shown in Figure 1. The dominant modes in the Raman spectra of TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN samples at Eg (144 cm−1), Eg (200 cm−1), B1g (397 cm−1), B1g/A1g (516 cm−1), and Eg (639 cm−1) can be assigned to the Raman active modes of the anatase crystal phase [18]. However, for TiO2 AN, it is evident the presence of additional bands at A1g (247 cm−1) B1g (320 cm−1) that could be attributed to the TiO2 in brookite form (Figure 1a) [19].

Figure 1

Raman spectra of (a) TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN; (b) TiO2 AN, 0.5VTiO2, 1VTiO2 and 5VTiO2.

Figure 1b reports the Raman spectra of VTiO2 photocatalysts. It is possible to observe that the presence of vanadium did not induce a change of the TiO2 crystalline structure. Moreover the presence of vanadium oxides or other vanadate structures, with bands expected in the range 800–1050 cm−1, are not observed [20].

The crystalline phases of the samples were also determined by XRD analysis (Figure 2). The TiO2 AA sample (Figure 2a) shows diffraction peaks typically of TiO2 in anatase form (indicated with capital letter “A” in the Figure 2) at 25.13, 37.6, 47.43, 53.74, 62.06 and 68.06 degrees while TiO2 AN shows diffraction peaks due not only to anatase phase but also to brookite (indicated with capital letter “B” in the Figure 2) because of the presence of an additional diffraction signal at 30.8 degree. These results indicate that TiO2 AN sample consists of biphasic anatase-brookite nanoparticles [21]. All the peaks found in the case of VTiO2 nanoparticles (Figure 2b) are similar to those ones observed for TiO2 AN without any additional peaks different from anatase (A) and brookite (B) phases. No diffraction peaks corresponding to V-species is found for all the samples. Additionally, Figure 2b evidenced that the presence of vanadium induced a slight shift of the main peak position of TiO2 AN from 25.13 to 25.28 degree (for 1VTiO2 sample). The shift of the main TiO2 peak to a higher diffraction angle is consistent with the incorporation of V4+ ion, whose radius (0.72 Å) is smaller than that of Ti4+ ion (0.74 Å) [12]. However, no clear correlation between the V amount and the shift of the main peak of the anatase phase seems evident indicating that V4+ ion was incorporated into the crystal lattice of TiO2, or vanadium oxides species are very small in size and homogeneously dispersed on the catalyst surface [12]. The TiO2 crystallite size and crystalline phase type are listed in Table 1. It can be seen that the TiO2 in brookite phase is present only for the sample prepared with nitric acid (TiO2 AN) and it is completely absent for TiO2 prepared with acetic acid (TiO2 AA). The average crystallite size of all the samples was calculated using the Scherrer equation. The calculated crystallite sizes of TiO2 AN (5.23 nm) are smaller than TiO2 AA (6.93 nm). Typically, the crystal structure and particle sizes depend on different synthesis conditions, such as pH and type of used chemicals [4,8]. Possibly, during the synthesis process, acidic substances could be seen as catalysts able to induce a change in the crystallization mechanism and therefore can influence the final TiO2 crystallite size and consequently the photocatalytic activity [22].

Figure 2

XRD patters of (a) TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN; (b) TiO2 AN, 0.5VTiO2, 1VTiO2 and 5VTiO2.

The results reported in Table 1 evidenced that the crystallite size for 0.5VTiO2 sample (V/Ti molar ratio equal to 1.84 × 10−4) is equal to 4.63 nm, lower than the size observed for TiO2 AN catalyst (5.23 nm). With the further increase of the V doping level, the crystallite size slightly increased with respect to 0.5VTiO2 sample. The specific surface areas (SSA) were also measured for all the samples and reported in Table 1. In particular, the SSA was similar for the sample TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN and almost equal to about 330 m2 g−1 while the presence of V in the TiO2 crystalline structure led to an slight increase for 0.5VTiO2 and a strong decrease for 1VTiO2 and 5VTiO2 samples. Elaborations of UV-Vis DRS spectra for the evaluation of band gap energy are shown in Figure 3. From this comparison between TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN (Figure 3a) it can be seen that the addition of nitric acid in the solution synthesis shifted the absorption onset to a lower wavelength compared with the sample prepared using acetic acid, due to the presence of brookite phase in TiO2 AN sample [23]. Figure 3b reports the elaborations of UV-Vis DRS spectra for VTiO2 samples, evidencing that the introduction of V4+ ion in the TiO2 structure led to a decrease of the absorption band edge compared to TiO2 AN.

Figure 3

Elaborations of UV–Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectra for (a) TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN; (b) TiO2 AN, 0.5VTiO2, 1VTiO2 and 5VTiO2.

The band gap values, estimated from the diffuse-reflectance spectra using the Kubelka-Munk function, are reported in Table 1. A small decrease is observed after the doping with vanadium. The decrease of band gap values observed for V-doped TiO2 samples is due to the charge-transfer transition between the d electrons of the vanadium dopant and the conduction band (or valence band) of the TiO2 [12].

3.2. Photocatalytic Activity Tests

Figure 4 shows the photocatalytic results of CAF degradation using TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN photocatalysts under UV irradiation.

Figure 4

Photocatalytic degradation of caffeine using TiO2 AA and TiO2 AN under UV irradiation.

In particular, the best results were obtained using TiO2 AN sample leading to a degradation of 80% after 360 min of UV irradiation. A lower activity was achieved for TiO2 AA photocatalyst (caffeine degradation of 51% after 360 min of UV irradiation). This result could be due to the presence of biphase (anatase, brookite) that allowed a slight decrease in the TiO2 AN particle size and decrease in the band-gap energy (Table 1). The coupling of different TiO2 crystalline phases allows the displacement of electrons from one semiconductor to another, leading to more efficient electron/hole separation and enhancing the photocatalytic reactivity [24]. The effect of V content was also analyzed in terms of CAF degradation (Figure 5). It can be seen that, after 360 min of UV irradiation, the photocatalytic CAF degradation increased from 87% to 96% by increasing the V content (sample 0.5VTiO2 and 1VTiO2 samples), showing photocatalytic activity higher than that of the undoped TiO2 AN (81% of CAF degradation) after the same irradiation time. For a further increase of V content (5VTiO2 sample), the photocatalytic activity dramatically decreased, reaching 35% of CAF degradation after 360 min of UV irradiation. In summary, the results with the V-doped TiO2 samples showed an optimum doping level able to assure the best activity (96% of CAF degradation after 360 min).

Figure 5

Photocatalytic degradation of caffeine using TiO2 AA and doped VTiO2 (0.5VTiO2, 1VTiO2 and 5VTiO2) under UV irradiation.

Kinetics Evaluation of Pollutants Degradation and Mineralization

In order to assess the influence of the doping level on photocatalytic performances, the kinetic constant of caffeine degradation was calculated (Table 2). It was considered that the CAF photodegradation process can be described by the pseudo-first order kinetics [25]. The photodegradation rate (r) depends on the initial pollutant concentration (C) in accordance with the following equation (Equation (1)):r = k × C where C is the concentration of CAF during the UV light in mg·L−1 and k is the kinetic constant in min−1. Considering the mass balance for the batch reactor (Equation (2)): and integrating the Equation (2) between initial time (t = 0) and a generic irradiation time t, it was obtained the following equation (Equation (3)):

Table 2

Kinetic constant (k) and half-life time (t1/2) values for degradation process with together TOC removal after 360 min of UV irradiation.

Substance	Catalysts	Degradation		TOC 1, %
		k, min−1	t1/2, min
CAF	TiO2 AA	0.0016	433	9
	TiO2 AN	0.0039	177	17
	0.5VTiO2	0.0047	147	54
	1VTiO2	0.0075	92	72
	5VTiO2	0.0011	693	4

1 TOC removal after 360 min of UV light irradiation.

The value of the kinetic constant k can be calculated by the slope of the straight line obtained from plotting () versus irradiation time (t). The obtained values of k for all the investigated photocatalysts are reported in Table 2 (R2 values are in the range 0.96–0.99). As can be seen in Table 2, the highest value of k (0.0075 min−1) was obtained using the 1VTiO2 photocatalyst, evidencing the existence of an optimal V doping content. Moreover, the kinetic constant increased from 0.0039 min−1 for TiO2 AN to 0.0075 min−1 for 1VTiO2, while the further increase in V amount (5VTiO2 sample), led to a decrease of k value up to 0.0011 min−1. Generally, the variation of photocatalytic activity with the increase of dopant content can be ascribed to the cooperative effect between the band gap, crystallite sizes, and crystallinity [12]. However, in this study, the optimal 1VTiO2 photocatalyst presents a specific surface area and crystallite size lower than 0.5VTiO2 sample and a band gap value lower than TiO2 AN (Table 1). Therefore, the presence of an optimum value for V content could be explained considering that the V doping could probably reduce the electron-hole recombination of and thus improves both the CAF photocatalytic degradation and mineralization rates [12]. Moreover, the presence of V in the TiO2 lattice can produce more photoinduced electrons and holes, which can increase the photocatalytic activity to some extent [12]. This happened when the V content was increased up to 3.67 × 10−4 V/Ti molar ratio. Meanwhile, when the doping level was further increased, the presence of the dopant may induce the formation of recombination centers. Consequently, the recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs could become easier and worsening the photocatalytic activity [26]. Based on the calculated k values from Equation (2), the half-life time (t1/2, min) of the CAF photodegradation was determined according to the Equation (4) [27]:

From the obtained results (Table 2) it can be deduced the half-life time value is sensibly lower for the sample 1VTiO2. In addition, in order, to characterize the mineralization ability of the tested samples, TOC measurements were carried out. Table 2 reports the TOC removal obtained after 360 min of UV irradiation. Similar to the degradation results, the best results in terms of TOC removal was obtained using 1VTiO2, allowing to reach 72% TOC removal and evidencing, therefore, the ability of the optimized 1VTiO2 photocatalyst in the mineralization of the target pollutant.

4. Conclusions

In this work, TiO2 based photocatalysts were obtained at room temperature starting from a modified sol-gel method. The characterization data showed that the presence of nitric acid during the synthesis induced the formation of a biphase crystalline structure (anatase-brookite) TiO2. The best results using bare titania in the photocatalytic removal of caffeine were obtained on the biphase TiO2 AN sample, with a degradation of 80% after 360 min of UV irradiation. Vanadyl sulphate was used as a dopant source for increasing the activity of biphase TiO2. The XRD data showed that vanadium was incorporated in the crystalline structure of TiO2. The presence of vanadium into the TiO2 structure significantly enhanced the photocatalytic performances, allowing the achievement of a caffeine degradation of 96% after 360 min of UV irradiation on 1VTiO2. The coupling of different TiO2 crystalline phases and doping with vanadium induces a lower band gap energy value and permits a more efficient electron/hole separation, enhancing the photocatalytic reactivity. The sample 1VTiO2 possesses the optimal trade-off among band gap energy, specific surface area and crystallinity.