Literature DB >> 30893230

Postoperative Mobilization After Superior Rotator Cuff Repair: Sling Versus No Sling: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Jérôme Tirefort1,2, Adrien J Schwitzguebel2, Philippe Collin3, Alexandra Nowak2, Chantal Plomb-Holmes2, Alexandre Lädermann1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are commonly advised to wear a sling for 4 to 6 weeks after rotator cuff repair despite negative effects of early immobilization and benefits of motion rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes up to 6 months following rotator cuff repair with and without postoperative sling immobilization.
METHODS: We randomized 80 patients scheduled for arthroscopic repair of a small or medium superior rotator cuff tear into sling and no-sling groups (40 patients each). Passive mobilization was performed in both groups during the first 4 postoperative weeks, and this was followed by progressive active mobilization. Patients were evaluated clinically at 10 days and 1.5, 3, and 6 months and using ultrasound at 6 months. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine if postoperative scores were associated with sex, age at surgery, immobilization, arm dominance, a biceps procedure, resection of the distal part of the clavicle, or preoperative scores.
RESULTS: The sling and no-sling groups had similar preoperative patient characteristics, function, and adjuvant procedures. At 10 days, there was no difference in pain between the 2 groups (mean pain score [and standard deviation], 5.2 ± 2.3 versus 5.2 ± 1.9, p = 0.996). In comparison with the sling group, the no-sling group showed greater mean external rotation (23.5° ± 15.6° versus 15.3° ± 14.6°, p = 0.017) and active elevation (110.9° ± 31.9° versus 97.0° ± 25.0°, p = 0.038) at 1.5 months as well as better mean active elevation (139.0° ± 24.7° versus 125.8° ± 24.4°, p = 0.015) and internal rotation (T12 or above in 50% versus 28%, p = 0.011) at 3 months. Ultrasound evaluation revealed no significant differences at 6 months in tendon thickness anteriorly (p = 0.472) or posteriorly (p = 0.639), bursitis (p = 1.000), echogenicity (p = 0.422), or repair integrity (p = 0.902). Multivariable analyses confirmed that the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score increased with patient age (beta, 0.60; p = 0.009), the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) decreased with sling immobilization (beta, -6.33; p = 0.014), and pain increased with sling immobilization (beta, 0.77; p = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: No immobilization after rotator cuff repair is associated with better early mobility and functional scores in comparison with sling immobilization. Postoperative immobilization with a sling may therefore not be required for patients treated for a small or medium tendon tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30893230     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A multi-centre pilot & feasibility randomised controlled trial (RaCeR).

Authors:  Chris Littlewood; Marcus Bateman; Stephanie Butler-Walley; Sarah Bathers; Kieran Bromley; Martyn Lewis; Lennard Funk; Jean Denton; Maria Moffatt; Rachel Winstanley; Saurabh Mehta; Gareth Stephens; Lisa Dikomitis; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: A nested qualitative study exploring the perceptions and experiences of participants in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gareth Stephens; Chris Littlewood; Nadine E Foster; Lisa Dikomitis
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  To sling or not to sling the shoulder after rotator cuff repair: which side are you on?

Authors:  In-Ho Jeon; Erica Kholinne
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08

4.  Prognostic factors for the occurrence of post-operative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Stojanov; Linda Modler; Andreas M Müller; Soheila Aghlmandi; Christian Appenzeller-Herzog; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Effect of Abduction Brace Wearing Compliance on the Results of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Florian Grubhofer; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Christian Gerber; Bettina Hochreiter; Ines Schwihla; Karl Wieser; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Assessment of abduction motion in patients with rotator cuff tears: an analysis based on inertial sensors.

Authors:  Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; Miguel Cuadros-Romero; Paul Bennett; Steven McPhail; Graham K Kerr; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jaime Martin-Martin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Vincenzo Candela; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Calogero Di Naro; Gabriella Facchinetti; Anna Marchetti; Gaia Sciotti; Giulia Santamaria; Ilaria Piergentili; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Ara Nazarian; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Shoulder biomechanics in normal and selected pathological conditions.

Authors:  Patrick Goetti; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin; Mohamed Ibrahim; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 9.  A Review of Online Rehabilitation Protocols Designated for Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Reed G Coda; Sana G Cheema; Christina A Hermanns; Armin Tarakemeh; Matthew L Vopat; Meghan Kramer; John Paul Schroeppel; Scott Mullen; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.