Helen M Kamens1,2, Constanza P Silva1, Russell T Nye1, Carley N Miller1, Nayantara Singh1, Joseph Sipko1, Neil Trushin3, Dongxiao Sun4,5, Steven A Branstetter1,2, Joshua E Muscat2,3, John P Richie2,3,4, Jonathan Foulds2,3,6. 1. Biobehavioral Health Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2. Penn State Cancer Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA. 4. Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA. 5. Penn State Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spectrum research cigarettes have been developed with varying nicotine content for use in studies evaluating the effects of a regulatory policy reducing the permissible nicotine content in cigarettes. This study aimed to characterize the nicotine pharmacokinetic profile of Spectrum cigarettes. METHODS: Twelve daily smokers attended four sessions and had blood nicotine, exhaled carbon monoxide, and subjective effects measured before and after smoking either a single cigarette of their preferred brand or high (10.9 mg/cigarette), medium (3.2 mg/cigarette), or low (0.2 mg/cigarette) nicotine content Spectrum research cigarettes, in a double-blind design with order counterbalanced. RESULTS: The boost in blood nicotine concentration was dose-dependent, with a boost of 0.3, 3.9, and 17.3 ng/mL for low-, medium-, and high-nicotine content Spectrum cigarettes. The high dose Spectrum had a similar nicotine boost to the "preferred brand" cigarettes (19 ng/mL). Subjects took longer puffs on the low nicotine cigarettes, but smoked these cigarettes faster than other cigarette types. High nicotine Spectrum cigarettes reduced the urge to smoke more than other cigarette types. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Spectrum research cigarettes produce blood nicotine absorption in a dose-dependent manner, and therefore, are appropriate for use in studies of nicotine reduction in cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of Spectrum reduced nicotine content research cigarettes following an overnight abstinence. These data could provide evidence to regulatory agencies about the effects of reduced nicotine cigarettes when considering regulations on tobacco reduction.
INTRODUCTION: Spectrum research cigarettes have been developed with varying nicotine content for use in studies evaluating the effects of a regulatory policy reducing the permissible nicotine content in cigarettes. This study aimed to characterize the nicotine pharmacokinetic profile of Spectrum cigarettes. METHODS: Twelve daily smokers attended four sessions and had blood nicotine, exhaled carbon monoxide, and subjective effects measured before and after smoking either a single cigarette of their preferred brand or high (10.9 mg/cigarette), medium (3.2 mg/cigarette), or low (0.2 mg/cigarette) nicotine content Spectrum research cigarettes, in a double-blind design with order counterbalanced. RESULTS: The boost in blood nicotine concentration was dose-dependent, with a boost of 0.3, 3.9, and 17.3 ng/mL for low-, medium-, and high-nicotine content Spectrum cigarettes. The high dose Spectrum had a similar nicotine boost to the "preferred brand" cigarettes (19 ng/mL). Subjects took longer puffs on the low nicotine cigarettes, but smoked these cigarettes faster than other cigarette types. High nicotine Spectrum cigarettes reduced the urge to smoke more than other cigarette types. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Spectrum research cigarettes produce blood nicotine absorption in a dose-dependent manner, and therefore, are appropriate for use in studies of nicotine reduction in cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of Spectrum reduced nicotine content research cigarettes following an overnight abstinence. These data could provide evidence to regulatory agencies about the effects of reduced nicotine cigarettes when considering regulations on tobacco reduction.
Authors: Saul Shiffman; William G Shadel; Raymond Niaura; Moise A Khayrallah; Douglas E Jorenby; Charles F Ryan; Clifford L Ferguson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: J Foulds; A Hobkirk; E Wasserman; J Richie; S Veldheer; N M Krebs; L Reinhart; J Muscat Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen J Heishman; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Rachel L Denlinger; Astia N Roper-Batker; Kristen M Mackowick; Joni Jensen; Sharon E Murphy; Brian F Thomas; Eric Donny Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nicolle M Krebs; Sophia I Allen; Susan Veldheer; Diane J Martinez; Kimberly Horn; Craig Livelsberger; Jennifer Modesto; Robin Kuprewicz; Ashley Wilhelm; Shari Hrabovsky; Abid Kazi; Alyse Fazzi; Jason Liao; Junjia Zhu; Emily Wasserman; Samantha M Reilly; Lisa Reinhart; Neil Trushin; Robinn E Moyer; Rebecca Bascom; Jonathan Foulds; John P Richie; Joshua E Muscat Journal: Trials Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Natalie Nardone; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Sharon E Murphy; Andrew A Strasser; Jennifer W Tidey; Ryan Vandrey; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Patricia Richter; Pappas R Steven; Roberto Bravo; Joseph G Lisko; Maria Damian; Nathalie Gonzalez-Jimenez; Naudia Gray; Lisa M Keong; Jacob B Kimbrell; Peter Kuklenyik; Tameka S Lawler; Grace E Lee; Magaly Mendez; Jose Perez; Shakia Smith; Hang Tran; Robert Tyx; Clifford H Watson Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2016
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Michael Kotlyar; Louise A Hertsgaard; Yan Zhang; Steven G Carmella; Joni A Jensen; Sharon S Allen; Peter G Shields; Sharon E Murphy; Irina Stepanov; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: J Loughead; E P Wileyto; J N Valdez; P Sanborn; K Tang; A A Strasser; K Ruparel; R Ray; R C Gur; C Lerman Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Diann E Gaalema; Jennifer W Tidey; Danielle R Davis; Stacey C Sigmon; Sarah H Heil; Maxine L Stitzer; Michael J Desarno; Valeria Diaz; John R Hughes; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.244