Literature DB >> 30892443

Differentiation between stercoral perforation and colorectal cancer perforation.

Ji Yoon Moon1, Seong Sook Hong2, JiYoung Hwang2, Hae Kyung Lee3, Kyo Chang Choi4, Hwajin Cha2, Hyun-Joo Kim2, Yun-Woo Chang2, EunJi Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the computed tomography (CT) signs associated with stercoral perforation and colorectal cancer perforation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2003 to Feb. 2015, all surgically and pathologically confirmed patients with stercoral perforation (n=8, mean age 68.3 years) or colon cancer perforation (n=11, mean age 66.3 years) were retrospectively reviewed by two board-certified radiologists blinded to the proven diagnosis. The following CT findings were evaluated and recorded for each patient: wall thickness of the distal colon adjacent to perforation site, pattern of the colon wall thickening and enhancement, length of the thickened bowel wall, presence of fecaloma, degree of proximal colon dilatation, and pericolonic inflammation or presence of pericolonic abscess, and number of enlarged pericolonic lymph nodes. These findings were correlated with the pathologic diagnosis.
RESULTS: The mean thickness of the distal colonic wall adjacent to the perforation site was 13.6 mm in patients with colorectal cancer perforation and 5.1 mm with stercoral perforation, which was statistically different. There was a significant correlation between colorectal cancer perforation and eccentric wall thickening (p<0.01). CT findings of layered enhancing wall thickening (p<0.01) and the presence of fecaloma in the proximal colon (p<0.01) were significant findings for stercoral perforation. Patients with colorectal cancer displayed more pericolonic lymph nodes (mean 2.27, p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Fecaloma in the proximal colon and layered enhancing wall thickening adjacent to perforation site are likely due to stercoral perforation. Eccentric bowel wall thickening at the distal portion of the perforation site with many enlarged pericolonic lymph nodes is most likely due to colorectal cancer perforation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30892443     DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.2.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)        ISSN: 0104-4230            Impact factor:   1.209


  2 in total

1.  Unusual presentation of rectal squamous cell carcinoma perforation-case report and literature review.

Authors:  Hiral Amin; Ruben D Salas-Parra; Lauren Stantley; Nirmala K Rajee; Vinayak S Gowda
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-18

2.  Stercoral re-perforation after colostomy takedown: a case report.

Authors:  Seunghwan Lee; Chang Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.