Literature DB >> 30892290

A Clinical Resonance Frequency Analysis of Implants Placed at Dehiscence-type Defects with Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration During Early Healing.

Rueangsiri Janyaphadungpong, Pravej Serichetaphongse, Atiphan Pimkhaokham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of implants placed in bone with and without dehiscence bone defects over 12 weeks and to compare the ISQ values between the two groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with edentulous area at posterior mandible were enrolled. Thirty OsseoSpeed EV Astra Tech implants (Dentsply Sirona), 4.2 mm in diameter, were placed. Twenty implants were placed without bone regeneration (control group), while 10 presented with favorable bone defects and received simultaneous guided bone regeneration with dental implant placement (study group). At the time of implant placement, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was utilized. The changes in ISQ values within group were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA, and the mean ISQ values between the control and study groups were compared using unpaired t tests.
RESULTS: All implants were successfully integrated without complication. The control group demonstrated mean ISQ values of 74.30 ± 6.01, 69.58 ± 5.30, 71.10 ± 5.80, 75.08 ± 3.93, and 77.85 ± 3.18 at baseline, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. The study group demonstrated mean ISQ values of 69.85 ± 7.00, 63.40 ± 8.47, 59.90 ± 10.23, 72.55 ± 3.10, and 76.20 ± 2.68 at baseline, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. The study group showed significantly lower mean ISQ values at 2 weeks (P = .021) and at 4 weeks (P = .007) after implant placement compared to those of the control group.
CONCLUSION: Within the 12-week healing period, all implants demonstrated successful osseointegration and achieved stability in favorable bone defects. Nevertheless, clinicians should consider that significantly lower implant stability can occur in the first month.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30892290     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  2 in total

1.  Can the Macrogeometry of Dental Implants Influence Guided Bone Regeneration in Buccal Bone Defects? Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis in Beagle Dogs.

Authors:  Manuel Fernández-Domínguez; Victor Ortega-Asensio; Elena Fuentes-Numancia; Juan Manuel Aragoneses; Horia Mihail Barbu; María Piedad Ramírez-Fernández; Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Nahum Samet; Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  The stability of tetracalcium phosphate/titanium implants: A short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Pawhat Nimmawitt; Paknisa Sittikornpaiboon; Svas Jaemsuwan; Sirida Arunjaroensuk; Jen-Chyan Wang; Chun-Cheng Hung; Boosana Kaboosaya; Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.719

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.