Literature DB >> 30891630

Threshold of the skull injury for blunt force impacts under free and constraint boundary conditions.

Lea Siegenthaler1, Michael Strehl2, Alessio Vaghi3, Philippe Zysset4, Beat P Kneubuehl5, Martin Frenz2.   

Abstract

The formation of skull fractures is an important topic in legal medicine. In particular, the influence of boundary conditions is controversially discussed in the literature. A study focusing solely on this aspect was missing. This study aimed to investigate the influence of boundary conditions on the energy threshold for head fractures. Because of the great variability of biological tissue of real skulls, we opted for a head model made from a polyurethane sphere filled with gelatin. Furthermore, we decided to investigate two opposite situations: A fixed configuration where a model was placed on a rigid surface and a (quasi) free boundary configuration where the head model was held at a force of 5 N compensating for gravity. For both configurations, we determined the acceleration signal of the impactor, the force, and the energy threshold for head fracture. It turned out that the fracture forces for both configurations were the same whereas the energy threshold was 11.0 J for the fixed and 13.6 J for the free boundary. The difference seems to be negligible if compared to the effect of varying structural mechanical properties of real human heads. This means that in a forensic case, the two situations most probably cannot be distinguished. To investigate the influence of the impactor mass, we developed a mathematical model and fitted the experimental data. As a result, we found that in the free configuration, a larger mass increases the energy threshold for head fracture. So that in principle, the two configurations are distinguishable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt impact; Boundary condition; Energy threshold; Head model; Skull fractures

Year:  2019        PMID: 30891630     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02023-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  18 in total

1.  The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells; K Vandemheen; C Clement; H Lesiuk; A Laupacis; R D McKnight; R Verbeek; R Brison; D Cass; M E Eisenhauer; G Greenberg; J Worthington
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of wound patterns in homicide by sharp and blunt force.

Authors:  Vipul Namdeorao Ambade; Hemant Vasant Godbole
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  A new test set-up for skull fracture characterisation.

Authors:  P Verschueren; H Delye; B Depreitere; C Van Lierde; B Haex; D Berckmans; I Verpoest; J Goffin; J Vander Sloten; G Van der Perre
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A "skin-skull-brain model" for the biomechanical reconstruction of blunt forces to the human head.

Authors:  Michael J Thali; Beat P Kneubuehl; Richard Dirnhofer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2002-02-18       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  How hard is hard enough? An investigation of the force associated with lateral blunt force trauma to the porcine cranium.

Authors:  Calvin Gerald Mole; Marise Heyns; Trevor Cloete
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.376

6.  Fracture propagation in the human cranium: a re-testing of popular theories.

Authors:  A Kroman; T Kress; D Porta
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Tolerance of the skull to blunt ballistic temporo-parietal impact.

Authors:  David Raymond; Chris Van Ee; Gregory Crawford; Cynthia Bir
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The influence of striking object characteristics on the impact energy.

Authors:  Florian D Sprenger; Lea Siegenthaler; Beat P Kneubuehl; Christian Jackowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Ballistic impact to the forehead, zygoma, and mandible: comparison of human and frangible dummy face biomechanics.

Authors:  David C Viano; Cynthia Bir; Tim Walilko; Don Sherman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-06

10.  Impact energy of everyday items used for assault.

Authors:  Lea Siegenthaler; Florian D Sprenger; Beat P Kneubuehl; Christian Jackowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.