| Literature DB >> 30891399 |
Natalia M Pukhovskaya1, Olga V Morozova2,3, Nelya P Vysochina1, Nadejda B Belozerova1, Leonid I Ivanov1.
Abstract
Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) DNA was detected by PCR in Ixodes persulcatus Schulze, 1930, Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, 1844, Haemaphysalis japonica douglasi Nuttall et Warburton, 1915 and Dermacentor silvarum Olenev, 1932 ticks collected in the Amur region, the Jewish Autonomous region, the Sakhalin region and on the Khabarovsk territory. Infection rate of I. persulcatus with B. burgdorferi s.l. 10-69% exceeded the corresponding values of three other tick species in all examined regions during 1999-2014 despite different tick abundance and dominance structure. Bacterial loads estimated on the base of quantitative real time PCR varied from 102 to 109 genome-equivalents per a tick with maximal values for I. persulcatus and H. japonica. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene and 5S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer nucleotide sequences revealed two species: 1) Borrelia garinii of Asian type NT29 with several isolates of European type 20047; 2) Borrelia afzelii with identical sequences of the majority of studied isolates and VS461 reference strain in all regions except the Sakhalin Island where B. afzelii was not found. Borrelia miyamotoi of the relapsing fever group was detected as monoinfection or in combination with B. burgdorferi s.l. in 4.0 ± 0.9% and 4.8 ± 0.9% I. persulcatus ticks, respectively. Multiple locus sequence analysis of three fragments of 16S rRNA, glpQ and p66 genes proved that all the Far Eastern B. miyamotoi isolates belonged to the Asian type identical to FR64b strain (GenBank CP004217) from Japan. Wide distribution of Borrelia DNA in ticks, relative genetic homogeneity with similar sequences of the coding regions and the intergenic spacer of Borrelia wild isolates and temporal stability with high homology levels of the Far Eastern isolates of B. garinii, B. afzelii and B. miyamotoi with previously described spirochetes from the surrounding regions of Russia, China and Japan allowed us to suggest multiple ecological niches as the stability factor of the parasitic system.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial loads; Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato; Borrelia miyamotoi; Ixodid ticks; Multiple locus sequence analysis (MLSA); Quantitative real-time PCR
Year: 2019 PMID: 30891399 PMCID: PMC6403414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Map of the tick collection places in the Far East of Russia.
Geographic locations of collection places and ratio of the ixodid tick species.
| Site № | District | Сollection place (or exact location) | Biotop | Geographic coordinates of the site | Year | Average number (ticks per 1 flag-hour) | Tick species ratio (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | E | ||||||||||
| 1 | Magdagachinsky | Ductui | larch-birch forest | 53°22′ | 126°08′ | 2011 | 85.3 | 33.6 | 0 | 0.8 | |
| 2 | Zeisky | Zeya | pine –birch forest | 53°44′ | 127°15′ | 2010 | N/A** | ||||
| 3 | Shimanovsky | Belovezh | larch-birch forest | 52°19′ | 127°24′ | 2011 | 122.0 | 4.9 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Blagoveshchensky | Raduga camp | deciduous forest | 50°40′ | 127°42′ | 2007 | 41.2 | 15.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Blagoveshchensky | Raduga camp | deciduous forest | 50°40′ | 127°42′ | 2008 | 13.8 | 41.4 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | Svobodnensky | Kosmodrom | broadleaved forest | 51°53′ | 128°20′ | 2011 | 30.0 | 8.9 | 0 | 2.2 | |
| 6 | Selemdzhinsky | Norsk | mixed deciduous forest | 52°20′ | 129°53′ | 2010 | 16.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | Oktyabrsky | Stolbovoye | broadleaved forest | 47°55ʹ | 131°03ʹ | 2013 | 19.3 | 6.9 | 24.1 | 17.3 | |
| 8 | Leninsky | Churki | coniferous–broadleaved forest | 48°04ʹ | 132°39ʹ | 2013 | 14.3 | 18.0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | Birobidzhansky | Birshosse, 17th km | coniferous–broadleaved forest | 48°41ʹ | 132°48ʹ | 2013 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 10.8 | 0 | |
| 10 | Lazo | Kiinsk | deciduous forest | 47°59ʹ | 134°49ʹ | 2014 | 38.3 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 0 | |
| 11 | Khabarovsky | Khekhtzir | coniferous–broadleaved forest | 48°15′ | 135°00′ | 1999–2014 | 182.9 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 3.2 | |
| 12 | Nanaisky | Troitzkoe | mixed broadleaved forest | 49°22′ | 136°36′ | 2014 | 13.8 | 40.6 | 7.2 | 0 | |
| 13 | Solnechny | Gorny | coniferous–broadleaved forest | 50°45′ | 136°27′ | 2009 | 62.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 14 | Solnechny | Solnechny | mixed coniferous–small-leaved forest | 50°26′ | 136°58′ | 2014 | 103.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | Komsomolsky | Khurba | secondary fine-leaved forest | 50°24′ | 136°52′ | 2009 | 25.0 | 18.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16 | Komsomolsky | Taezhny | coniferous–broadleaved forest | 50°35′ | 136°54′ | 2014 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 17 | Vaninsky | Toki | larch-small-leaved forest | 49°07′ | 140°18′ | 2011 | 57.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 18 | Kholmsky | Pionery | mixed coniferous–small-leaved forest | 47°16′ | 142°02′ | 2011 | 39.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 19 | Yuzhno-Sakhalinsky | Isvestkovy | mixed coniferous–small-leaved forest | 46°50′ | 142°56′ | 2011 | 60.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Notes: ∗ –the dominant ixodid species percents are marked in bold; **- average numbers of ixodid ticks were not calculated.
Accession numbers of nucleotide sequences of Borrelia isolates determined in our study.
| sequence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA | 5S—23S IGS | p66 | glpQ | |
| KY312010 - KY312015, KY312118, KY346888 - KY346892, KY346970 - KY346973, KY348800, | KY924779, KY937676 - KY937682, KY963154 - KY963161 | |||
| KX622580, KX622581, KX622852, KX688604 | KX685726 - KX685729 | |||
| KX769848 - KX769851 | KX812709 - KX812712 | КХ898133 | ||
PCR detection of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato DNA in the individual ixodid ticks collected from vegetation.
| Site No | Year | District | The | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of studied ticks | Ticks with the Borrelia DNA | Rate (%) | Number of studied ticks | Ticks with the Borrelia DNA | Rate (%) | Number of studied ticks | Ticks with the Borrelia DNA | Rate (%) | Number of studied ticks | Ticks with the Borrelia DNA | Rate (%) | |||
| 1 | 20111 | Magdagachinsky | 48 | 33 | 68.8 ± 6.8 | 51 | 2 | 3.9 ± 2.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| 2 | 20111 | Shimanovsky | 9 | 2 | 22.2 ± 14.7 | 89 | 4 | 4.5 ± 2.2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
| 3 | 20111 | Svobodnensky | 12 | 2 | 16.7 ± 11.2 | 85 | 3 | 3.5 ± 2.0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||
| 4 | 20101 | Selemdzhinsky | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | 20101 | Zeisky | 82 | 34 | 41.5 ± 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 11.8 ± 8.1 | ||||
| 6 | 20072 | Blagoveshchenky | 30 | 8 | 26.7 ± 8.2 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 6 | 20082 | Blagoveshchenky | 27 | 12 | 44.4 ± 9.7 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1–6 | 2007 -20111,2 | 208 | 91 | 43 | 424 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 8 | |||
| 7 | 20131 | Oktyabrsky | 20 | 2 | 10.0 ± 6.9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 20131 | Leninsky | 23 | 6 | 26.1 ± 9.4 | 0 | – | – | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | 20131 | Birobidzhansky | 50 | 27 | 54.0 ± 7.1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 7–9 | 20131 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 20141 | Lazo | 15 | 3 | 20.0 ± 10.7 | 21 | 1 | 4.8 ± 4.8 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 11 | 1999–20092 | Khabarovsky (Khekhtzir) | 530 | 152 | 28.7 ± 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 11 | 2010–20141 | Khabarovsky (Khekhtzir) | 250 | 136 | 54.4 ± 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 12 | 20141 | Nanaisky | 26 | 9 | 34.6 ± 9.5 | 21 | 4 | 19.0 ± 8.8 | 3 | 1 | 33.3 ± 33.3 | 0 | ||
| 13 | 20092 | Solnechny | 40 | 10 | 25.0 ± 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 14 | 20141 | Solnechny | 66 | 17 | 25.8 ± 5.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 15 | 20092 | Komsomolsky | 50 | 10 | 20.0 ± 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 16 | 20141 | Komsomolsky | 21 | 7 | 33.3 ± 10.5 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 28.6 ± 10.1 | 0 | ||||
| 17 | 20111 | Vaninsky | 100 | 69 | 69.0 ± 4.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 10–17 | 1999 -20141,2 | |||||||||||||
| 18 | 20111 | Kholmsky | 100 | 19 | 19.0 ± 3.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 19 | 20111 | Yuzhno-Sakhalinsky | 100 | 24 | 24.0 ± 4.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 18, 19 | 20111 | |||||||||||||
| 1–19 | 1999 -20141,2 | |||||||||||||
Notes:1 – results of real time PCR, 2 – data of PCR with subsequent electrophoresis.
PCR detection of the Borrelia miyamotoi DNA in individual Ixodes persulcatus ticks collected from vegetation.
| Site No | Year | District | The | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of studied ticks | |||||||||
| Ticks with the | Rate (%) | Ticks with the | Rate (%) | Ticks with the | Rate (%) | ||||
| 1 | 20111 | Magdagachinsky | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 20132 | Oktyabrsky | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10.0 ± 6.9 | 2 | 10.0 ± 6.9 |
| 8 | 20132 | Leninsky | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.3 ± 4.2 | 1 | 4.3 ± 4.2 |
| 9 | 20132 | Birobidzhansky | 50 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10.0 ± 4.3 | 5 | 10.0 ± 4.3 |
| 7–9 | 20132 | ||||||||
| 11 | 20132 | Khabarovsky | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.0 ± 2.0 | 1 | 2.0 ± 2.0 |
| 11 | 20142 | Khabarovsky | 50 | 5 | 10.0 ± 4.3 | 4 | 8.0 ± 3.9 | 9 | 18.0 ± 5.5 |
| 10 | 20142 | Lazo | 15 | 4 | 26.7 ± 11.8 | 1 | 6.7 ± 6.7 | 5 | 33.3 ± 12.6 |
| 12 | 20142 | Nanaisky | 26 | 2 | 7.7 ± 5.3 | 1 | 3.8 ± 3.8 | 3 | 11.5 ± 6.4 |
| 14 | 20142 | Solnechny | 66 | 3 | 4.5 ± 2.6 | 3 | 4.5 ± 2.6 | 6 | 9.1 ± 3.6 |
| 16 | 20142 | Komsomolsky | 21 | 1 | 4.8 ± 4.8 | 2 | 9.5 ± 6.6 | 3 | 14.3 ± 7.8 |
| 17 | 20111 | Vaninsky | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.0 ± 2.0 | 1 | 2.0 ± 2.0 |
| 10-12, 14, 16, 17 | 2013–20141,2 | ||||||||
| 18 | 20111 | Kholmsky | 50 | 3 | 6.0 ± 3.4 | 2 | 4.0 ± 2.8 | 5 | 10.0 ± 4.3 |
| 19 | 20111 | Yuzhno-Sakhalinsky | 50 | 3 | 6.0 ± 3.4 | 2 | 4.0 ± 2.8 | 5 | 10.0 ± 4.3 |
| 18, 19 | 20111 | ||||||||
| 1–19 | 2011–20141,2 | ||||||||
Notes: 1 – data of PCR with electrophoresis detection; 2 – results of real-time PCR.
Threshold cycles (Ct) of quantitative real time PCR and deduced estimations of Borrrelia burgdorferi sensu lato DNA amounts in ixodid ticks in the Far East of Russia.
| Region/territory | No of tick collection site | Ixodidae tick species | Number of samples with the | Ct range (min-max) | Average Ct | Average quantity of genome-equivalents per a tick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amur | 1 | 33 | 11.47–31.28 | 22.84 ± 7.05 | 1.46 × 10(5) | |
| Amur | 2 | 2 | 15.05–17.35 | 16.20 ± 1.63 | 1.46 × 10(7) | |
| Amur | 3 | 2 | 19.43–19.73 | 19.58 ± 0.21 | 1.40 × 10(6) | |
| Amur | 5 | 34 | 18.93–30.32 | 24.73 ± 2.70 | 5.93 × 10(5) | |
| Jewish Autonomous | 7 | 2 | 12.44–14.74 | 13.59 ± 1.63 | 5.35 × 10(9) | |
| Jewish Autonomous | 8 | 6 | 11.24–15.15 | 12.84 ± 1.41 | 8.75 × 10(9) | |
| Jewish Autonomous | 9 | 27 | 10.68–17.44 | 13.41 ± 1.85 | 6.06 × 10(9) | |
| Khabarovsk | 10 | 3 | 14.65–30.04 | 19.90 ± 8.79 | 6.72 × 10(7) | |
| Khabarovsk | 11 | 136 | 10.62–31.84 | 20.03 ± 6.42 | 6,16 × 10(7) | |
| Khabarovsk | 12 | 9 | 10.42–23.73 | 18.48 ± 6.33 | 1.81 × 10(8) | |
| Khabarovsk | 14 | 17 | 10.79–25.97 | 17.97 ± 5.59 | 2.57 × 10(8) | |
| Khabarovsk | 16 | 7 | 11.01–22.53 | 14.58 ± 4.01 | 2.69 × 10(9) | |
| Khabarovsk | 17 | 69 | 9.33–33.91 | 22.56 ± 7.03 | 1.07 × 10(7) | |
| Sakhalin | 18 | 19 | 11.71–31.64 | 19.28 ± 7.57 | 1.04 × 10(8) | |
| Sakhalin | 19 | 24 | 11.27–31.05 | 20.07 ± 7.20 | 5.99 × 10(7) | |
| Amur | 1 | 2 | 29.49–34.20 | 31.85 ± 3.33 | 2.84 × 10(2) | |
| Amur | 2 | 4 | 29.98–33.21 | 32.02 ± 1.41 | 2.52 × 10(2) | |
| Amur | 3 | 3 | 30.30–33.01 | 31.29 ± 1.49 | 4.18 × 10(2) | |
| Khabarovsk | 10 | 1 | 30.69 | 30.69 | 3.81 × 10(4) | |
| Khabarovsk | 12 | 4 | 24.42–26.48 | 24.95 ± 0.04 | 2.88 × 10(6) | |
| Khabarovsk | 12 | 1 | 13.96 | 13.96 | 4.14 × 10(9) | |
| Khabarovsk | 16 | 6 | 20.47–21.86 | 21.22 ± 0.48 | 4.50 × 10(5) | |
| Amur | 5 |
Quantitative comparative analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi and Borrrelia burgdorferi sensu lato Ct and bacterial loads in Ixodes persulcatus ticks collected in the Far East of Russia.
| District | Number of tick collection site | Mixed infection with | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples with the | Ct range (min-max) | Average Ct | Average quantity of genome-equivalents per a tick | Number of samples with the Borrelia DNA | Ct range (min-max) | Average Ct | Average quantity of genome-equivalents per a tick | ||
| Oktyabrsky | 7 | 0 | 2 | 32.89–33.79/12.44–14.74 | 33.34 ± 0.64/13.59 ± 1.63 | 3,03 × 10(3)/5.35 × 10(9) | |||
| Leninsky | 8 | 0 | 1 | 35.25/12.87 | 35.25/12.87 | 8.07 × 10(2)/8.81 × 10(9) | |||
| Birobidzhansky | 9 | 0 | 5 | 33.66–36.02/10.84–13.84 | 34.92 ± 1.17/12.20 ± 1.16 | 1,01 × 10(3)/1.40 × 10(10) | |||
| Lazo | 10 | 4 | 33.94–37.24 | 35.55 ± 1.54 | 6.56 × 10(2) | 1 | 37.31/30.04 | 37.31/30.04 | 1.94 × 10(2)/5.98 × 10(4) |
| Khabarovsky | 11 | 5 | 27.74–31.55 | 30.27 ± 1.73 | 2.55 × 10(4) | 5 | 17.53–30.80/11.92–28.85 | 25.37 ± 6.51/21.62 ± 7.60 | 7.61 × 10(5)/2.05 × 10(7) |
| Nanaisky | 12 | 2 | 35.34–38.58 | 36.96 ± 2.29 | 2.47 × 10(2) | 1 | 33.80/11.17 | 33.80/11.17 | 2.21 × 10(3)/2.86 × 10(10) |
| Solnechny | 14 | 3 | 22.78–33.25 | 29.75 ± 6.03 | 3.65 × 10(4) | 3 | 32.54–35.00/12.46–25.97 | 33.92 ± 1,26/17.57 ± 7.33 | 2,03 × 10(3)/3.39 × 10(8) |
| Komsomolsky | 16 | 1 | 18.72 | 7.64 × 10(7) | 2 | 21.62–36.19/11.01–12.68 | 28,91 ± 10.30/11,85 ± 1.18 | 6.54 × 10(4)/1.79 × 10(10) | |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of Borrelia 16S rRNA gene fragment of 733 bp long (A) and 5S—23S ITS of 211–218 bp long (B) using Mega 6.06 software, UPGMA algorithm and 1,000 replications. Phylogenetic trees constructed by means of 5 alternative algorithms (Maximum likelihood, Neighbor-Joining, Minimum-Evolution, UPGMA and Maximum Parsimony) show similar topologies and reasonable bootstrap support. Nucleotide sequences of Borrelia isolates determined in our study are shown in bold. The number of identical sequences of Borrelia isolates determined in these ixodid ticks is shown in parentheses. Branches corresponding to the reference strains are underlined.
Fig. 3Multiple locus sequence analysis (MLSA) of Borrelia miyamotoi 16S rRNA gene fragment of 1248 bp (A), glpQ gene fragment 536 bp (B) and p66 gene fragment 526 bp long (C) using Mega 6.06 software, UPGMA algorithm and 1,000 replications. Phylogenetic trees constructed by means of 5 alternative algorithms (Maximum likelihood, Neighbor-Joining, Minimum-Evolution, UPGMA and Maximum Parsimony) show similar topologies and reasonable bootstrap support. Nucleotide sequences of Borrelia isolates determined in our study are shown in bold. The number of identical sequences of Borrelia isolates determined in these ixodid ticks is shown in parentheses. Branches corresponding to the reference strains are underlined.