| Literature DB >> 30890753 |
Sri Renukadevi Balusamy1, Sivasubramanian Ramani2, Sathishkumar Natarajan3, Yeon Ju Kim4, Haribalan Perumalsamy5.
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, particularly stomach cancer is third most common causes of cancer death worldwide. Citral possesses anti-tumor activity in various cancer cell lines, However its effect toward stomach cancer and its mechanism of action is have yet to be elucidated. The goal of the present study is to elucidate the role of citral in stomach cancer using transcriptome and in vitro approaches. We performed transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq and explored its capability to persuade apoptosis in AGS human stomach cancer cell lines in vitro. Furthermore, the enrichment and KEGG pathway results suggested that there are several genes involved to induce apoptosis pathway. Furthermore, our study also demonstrated that citral arrested colony formation and migration of cancer cells significantly than that of untreated cells. RNA-seq revealed a total of 125 million trimmed reads obtained from both control and citral treated groups respectively. A total number of 612 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified which includes 216 genes up-regulated and 396 genes down-regulated genes after treatment. The enrichment analysis identified DEGs genes from transcriptome libraries including cell death, cell cycle, apoptosis and cell growth. The present study showed the significant inhibition effect upon citral by regulating various genes involved in signaling pathways, inhibits metastasis, colony formation and induced apoptosis both in silico and in vitro.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30890753 PMCID: PMC6425008 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41406-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Decreased cell viability and morphological changes after citral treatment. (A) The chemical structure of cis- (neral) and trans-citral (geranial). (B) The image was captured right after performing MTT assay. (C) Inhibitory concentration (IC50) of citral towards AGS cancer cells was compared with positive control cisplatin. X-axis indicate compounds treated for cell lines and Y-axis indicate IC50. Cell toxicity of citral was compared with normal cell line MRC-5. (D) Morphological characteristics of AGS cell lines were observed after the treatment.
The statistics summary of RNA-Seq libraries.
| Library | Total reads | Reads length (bp) | Trimmed reads | Mapped reads | Mapping reads (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 75, 171,336 | 101 | 74,990,756 | 64,170,781 | 85.57 |
| Treated | 65,905,230 | 101 | 51,385,566 | 41,357,663 | 80.49 |
Figure 2Functional enrichment based interaction of up-regulated DEGs with related external genes.
Figure 3Functional enrichment based interaction network of DEGs of citral treatment groups.
Figure 4Network visualization of significantly overrepresented GO terms.
Figure 5Functional gene enrichment analysis of identified DEG as biological process.
Figure 6Functional gene enrichment of DEG as molecular function.
Figure 7Functional gene enrichment of DEG as cellular component.
KEGG enrichment analysis of identified DEG genes from control and citral treated samples in AGS.
| Differential expressed genes | KEGG | Pathway | Genes involved | Log2(fold change) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| hsa04101 |
| 8.09 | |
| hsa04064 |
|
| 5.42 | |
| hsa05200 |
| 5.42 | ||
| hsa05215 |
|
| 3.57 | |
| hsa04151 |
| 2.54 | ||
| hsa04115 |
|
| 2.54 | |
| hsa04210 |
|
| 1.85 | |
| hsa03040 |
|
| 1.67 | |
|
| hsa05200 |
| −1.17 | |
| hsa04110 |
| −1.25 | ||
| hsa05222 |
| −1.25 | ||
| hsa04151 |
| −1.25 | ||
| hsa04115 |
| −1.27 | ||
| hsa05210 |
|
| −1.65 | |
| hsa05202 |
| −1.68 | ||
| hsa04010 |
| −1.76 | ||
| hsa05219 |
| −1.80 | ||
| hsa03320 |
| −1.80 | ||
| hsa01212 |
| −1.93 | ||
| hsa05205 |
| −1.97 | ||
| hsa04064 |
|
| −2.15 | |
| hsa05215 |
|
| −2.24 | |
| hsa04152 |
| −2.26 | ||
| Hsa05223 |
|
| −4.03 |
Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs genes involved in apoptosis pathway after citral treatment.
| DEG | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go terms | Category | Number of genes | Go id | p-value | Up-regulated genes | p-value | Down- regulated genes |
|
|
| 8 | GO:0006986 | 1.79E-09 | NA | NA | |
|
|
| 2 | GO:0043069 | 0.62 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
|
| 4 | GO:0060548 | 0.77 | 0.57 |
| |
|
|
| 19 | GO:0051726 | 1.64E-05 | 1.64E-05 | ||
|
|
| 2 | GO:0043069 | 0.62 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
|
| 1 | GO:0010942 | 0.12 |
| NA | NA |
|
|
| 4 | GO:0060548 | 0.77 | 0.57 |
| |
|
|
| 10 | GO:0043231 | NA | NA | 0.67 | |
|
|
| 2 | GO:0030308 | NA | NA | 0.87 | |
|
|
| 1 | GO:0043086 | 0.64 |
| NA | NA |
|
|
| 4 | GO:0007050 | NA | NA | 0.64 |
|
|
|
| 2 | GO:0045926 | 0.40 | NA | NA | |
|
|
| 5 | GO:0044267 | NA | NA | 0.64 | |
|
|
| 1 | GO:0032270 | NA | NA | 0.76 |
|
BP: Biological process; CC: Cellular component; NA Not available.
The identified up-regulated genes list after citral treatment in AGS cell lines.
| Go terms | Go ids | Category | p-value | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.54 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0008656 |
| 0.36 |
|
|
| GO:0006919 |
| 0.73 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.54 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0042981 |
| 0.59 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.52 |
|
|
| GO:0010664 |
| 0.26 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.46 |
|
BP: Biological process; MF: Molecular function.
The identified down-regulated genes list after citral treatment in AGS cell lines.
| Go terms | Go ids | Category | p-value | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043154 |
| 0.95 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:1990086 |
| 0.04 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043524 |
| 0.09 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0006919 |
| 0.88 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043154 |
| 0.95 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0042981 |
| 0.67 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0006919 |
| 0.88 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0002903 |
| 0.53 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0042981 |
| 0.67 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043154 |
| 0.95 |
|
|
| GO:0042981 |
| 0.67 |
|
|
| GO:0006915 |
| 0.45 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:2000352 |
| 0.10 |
|
|
| GO:0043524 |
| 0.09 |
|
|
| GO:2000352 |
| 0.10 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043065 |
| 0.33 |
|
|
| GO:0043066 |
| 0.50 |
|
BP: Biological process.
Figure 8The colony progress and invasive ability of AGS citral treatment (with or without) (A,B). Cells were seeded uniformly (1 × 103) and grown for 4 days. The crystal violet staining were used to detect the colonies. Based on dose-dependent (citral) the cells clearly exhibited growth inhibition. (C) The total number of colonies in with or without treatment were measured using imageJ software and plotted graphically (Fig. 2C). (D) The effect of citral has reduced down the migration cells associated to that of untreated cells and migration ability decreased with increasing concentration of citral treatment (Fig. 2D2–D5). The images are representative of three independent replicates. Each bar represents the mean ± SE of duplicate samples of three independent experiments (***P < 0.001using student’s t-test).
Figure 9Citral induced apoptosis in AGS cell lines. (A) DNA condensation and nuclear staining of AGS cells with or without citral treatment. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of cancer cells with or without treatment. Expressive figures displaying the population of live cells (annexin V− PI−), early apoptotic (annexin V+ PI−), late apoptotic cells (annexin V+ PI+) and necrotic cells (annexin V− PI+). (C) PI staining of AGS cells with or without citral treatment. The cells remained intact don’t allow cells to stain with the dye. However, the damage cells were stained with PI and indicated the apoptotic cells. (D) DNA fragmentation analysis was carried out after isolation of genomic DNA from AGS with or without different concentration of citral treatment. 1. DNA ladder 1 kb; 2. Control; 3. 5 µg/mL; 4. 10 µg/mL; 5. 20 µg/mL.