Literature DB >> 30890542

Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Llucia Benito1,2, Noemie Travier2,3, Gemma Binefa2,3,4, Carmen Vidal2,3, Jose Espinosa2,3, Núria Milà2,3,4, Montse Garcia5,3,4.   

Abstract

Longitudinal adherence is a critical component of the efficacy of stool-based screening programs because they should be repeated every 1-2 years. Few data have been published on the uptake in multiple rounds of fecal occult blood test-based (FOBT) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We calculated two measures of longitudinal adherence to biennial FOBT (guaiac fecal occult blood test:gFOBT or fecal immunochemical test:FIT) to better understand its impact on the programmatic effectiveness of a population-based CRC screening program (2000-2017). Ongoing population-based CRC program of men and women aged 50-69 years. Variables: Age at first CRC screening invitation, sex, number of screening invitations, number of screens, deprivation score, and uptake rate. Logistic regression models were used to assess the independent effect of sex, age at first invitation, deprivation, and the type of screening test offered on adherence. The uptake rate for guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) was 23.9%, and for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), it was 37.4%. The overall rate of consistently screened invitees after seven rounds of screening was 14.2%, being 20.6% for those individuals who used FIT and 14.3% for those who used gFOBT. Factors associated with continued participation (consistent vs. inconsistent screenees) showed that the longitudinal adherence was associated with age, screening test used, and number of invitations. Continued participation was lower in individuals who were screened using FIT than among those screened using gFOBT [OR, 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.81]. The overall rate of consistently screened invitees for colorectal cancer screening was higher with FIT than gFOBT. Studying the rate of individuals being current for screening may help to anticipate potential benefits before the long-term outcome data are available. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30890542     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  4 in total

1.  The impact of cumulative colorectal cancer screening delays: A simulation study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; John M Inadomi; Christopher E Maerzluft
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.687

Review 2.  Multisensor Systems and Arrays for Medical Applications Employing Naturally-Occurring Compounds and Materials.

Authors:  Rasa Pauliukaite; Edita Voitechovič
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Volatile organic compounds in breath can serve as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for the detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kelly E van Keulen; Maud E Jansen; Ruud W M Schrauwen; Jeroen J Kolkman; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Factors Associated with Participation in Stool Based Colorectal Screening in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong; Lydiana Kadir; Zakaria Kamis; Norhayati Kassim; Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil; Jackson Tan; Elvynna Leong; Sok King Ong; Chee Fui Chong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.