| Literature DB >> 30890173 |
Minji Jo1, Myung Hyun Noh2, Hyun Gyu Lim2, Chae Won Kang2, Dae-Kyun Im3, Min-Kyu Oh3, Gyoo Yeol Jung4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acetate is one of promising feedstocks owing to its cheap price and great abundance. Considering that tyrosine production is gradually shifting to microbial production method, its production from acetate can be attempted to further improve the economic feasibility of its production.Entities:
Keywords: Acetate; Gluconeogenesis; Glyoxylate cycle; Metabolic engineering; Synthetic biology; Tyrosine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30890173 PMCID: PMC6423740 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1106-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Overall strategy used in this study. a To produce tyrosine from acetate, the SCK1 strain, with amplification of the pathway from PEP to tyrosine, was used [17]. To further amplify the linear pathway from acetate to PEP, acs (encoding acetyl-CoA synthetase) and pck (encoding phosphoenolpyruvate synthase) were overexpressed. Thereafter, the glyoxylate cycle pathway was precisely controlled by varying the expression of aceA (encoding isocitrate lyase). b A schematic showing the pathway optimization strategy. Acetyl-CoA produced from acetate can be metabolized via two different pathways: oxidation into CO2 and generation of ATP and NADH via TCA cycle, or assimilation as metabolites and cell biomass via the glyoxylate cycle. Replenishment of precursors (PEP from OAA) and energy consumption for tyrosine production should be considered for efficient tyrosine production. This can be implemented by precise control of the glyoxylate cycle. OAA oxaloacetate, CIT citrate, ICT isocitrate, α-KG α-ketoglutarate, SUC succinate, MAL malate, GLY glyoxylate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, G-6-P glucose-6-phosphate, E-4-P erythrose-4-phosphate, DHAP dihydroxyacetone phosphate, TYR tyrosine
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Name | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| | Cloning host | Invitrogen |
| SCK1 | W3110 Δ | [ |
| SCKE | SCK1/pACYCduet-1 | This study |
| SCKA | SCK1/pACA | This study |
| SCKP | SCK1/pACP | This study |
| SCKAP | SCK1/pACAP | This study |
| SCKDIAP | SCK1 Δ | |
| SCKAPG1 | SCK1/pACAPG1 | This study |
| SCKAPG2 | SCK1/pACAPG2 | This study |
| SCKAPG3 | SCK1/pACAPG3 | This study |
| SCKAPG4 | SCK1/pACAPG4 | This study |
| SCKAPG5 | SCK1/pACAPG5 | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pKD46 | Red recombinase expression vector, AmpR | [ |
| pM_FKF | PCR template for FRT-KanR-FRT, pMB1 ori, AmpR, KmR | [ |
| pACYCduet-1 | p15A ori, CmR, | Novagen |
| pACA | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACP | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRpck- | This study |
| pACAP | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACAPG1 | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACAPG2 | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACAPG3 | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACAPG4 | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
| pACAPG5 | p15A ori, CmR, PBBa_J23100-synUTRacs- | This study |
Amp ampicillin, Cm chloramphenicol, Km kanamycin; R resistance
Fig. 2Fermentation profile of the SCK1 strain. The left y-axis shows OD600 and the right y-axis indicates concentration of the accumulated tyrosine; the y-offset indicates the concentration of the remaining acetate. The x-axis denotes time. Symbols: black circle, cell biomass (OD600); red squares, tyrosine; blue diamonds, acetate. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from three independent cultures
Fig. 3Effect of the expression of acs and pck. Cell biomass (a) and tyrosine production (b) after 30 h cultivation. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from three independent cultures
Fermentation profile of engineered E. coli
| Strain | Dry cell weight (g/L) | Specific acetate consumption rate (g/g DCW/h) | Acetate consumption (g/L) | Tyrosine (g/L) | Percentage yield (%)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCK1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 9.93 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 11 ± 1 |
| SCKA | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 8.33 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 17 ± 0 |
| SCKP | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 8.38 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 13 ± 1 |
| SCKAP | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 5.44 | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 17 ± 2 |
| SCKAPG1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 10.00 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | 9 ± 1 |
| SCKAPG2 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 10.00 | 0.42 ± 0.10 | 12 ± 3 |
| SCKAPG3 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 10.00 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 12 ± 0 |
| SCKAPG4 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 10.00 | 0.70 ± 0.11 | 20 ± 3 |
| SCKAPG5 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 10.00 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 12 ± 1.0 |
| SCKDIAP | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 4.79 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 18 ± 1 |
aPercentage yield indicates the ratio of actual yield to theoretical maximum yield expressed in percentage (%)
Fig. 4Effect of glyoxylate cycle activation. Comparison of normalized specific isocitrate lyase activity measured at 12 h (a), and cell biomass (b) and tyrosine production (c) after 30 h cultivation, and the fermentation profile of the SCKAPG4 strain (d). The left y-axis shows OD600 and the right y-axis indicates the concentration of accumulated tyrosine; the y-offset indicates the concentration of the remaining acetate. The x-axis denotes time. Symbols: black circle, cell biomass (OD600); red squares, tyrosine; blue diamonds, acetate. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from three independent cultures