Literature DB >> 30890032

Comparison of agricultural injuries reported in the media and census of fatal occupational injuries.

Moses New-Aaron1, Jessica Semin2, Ellen G Duysen3,4, Murray Madsen4, Kelsie Musil3, Risto H Rautiainen3,4.   

Abstract

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) publishes annual statistics on occupational injuries and fatalities in the United States. The BLS fatality data include all agricultural workers while the non-fatal injury data only cover hired employees on large farms. In 2012, the Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH) began collecting regional media monitoring data of agricultural injury incidents to augment national statistics. The aims of this report were: a) to compare CS-CASH injury and fatality data collected via print and online sources to data reported in previous studies, and b) to compare fatality data from media monitoring to BLS Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) data. CS-CASH media monitoring data were collected from a news clipping service and an internet detection and notification system. These data covered years 2012-2017 in seven Midwestern states (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota). CS-CASH occupational fatality data were compared with aggregate CFOI data for the region during 2012-2015. Media monitoring captured 1048 injury cases; 586 (56%) were non-fatal and 462 (44%) were fatal. The numbers of occupational fatality cases from media monitoring and CFOI were nearly identical (280 vs. 282, respectively), and the distributions by type of injury were similar. Findings suggest that media monitoring can capture equal numbers of fatalities compared to CFOI. Non-fatal injuries, not captured by national surveillance systems, can be collected and tracked using print and electronic media. Risk factors, identified in media sources, such as gender, age, time, and source of the incident are consistent with previously reported data. Media monitoring can provide timely access to detailed information on individual cases, which is important for detecting unique and emerging hazards, designing interventions and for setting policy and guiding national strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural injuries; CFOI; CS-CASH monitoring database; Fatality; Midwestern states

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30890032     DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1593276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  4 in total

1.  An initial analysis of agricultural trauma in South Dakota with an emphasis on work-related injuries.

Authors:  Jessica Simpkins; David Sturdevant; Gary Timmerman
Journal:  Aesculapius (Sioux Falls)       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Using hospitalization data for injury surveillance in agriculture, forestry and fishing: a crosswalk between ICD10CM external cause of injury coding and The Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System.

Authors:  Erika Scott; Liane Hirabayashi; Judy Graham; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Coexposure to Solvents and Noise as a Risk Factor for Hearing Loss in Agricultural Workers.

Authors:  Alexandra A Farfalla; Cheryl Beseler; Chandran Achutan; Risto Rautiainen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.306

4.  Assessing the Emergent Public Health Concern of All-Terrain Vehicle Injuries in Rural and Agricultural Environments: Initial Review of Available National Datasets in the United States.

Authors:  Bryan Weichelt; Serap Gorucu; Charles Jennissen; Gerene Denning; Stephen Oesch
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2020-05-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.