Isabel Witvrouwen1,2, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck1,2, Ana Abreu3, Trine Moholdt4, Nicolle Kränkel5,6. 1. 1 Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Cardiology, University of Antwerp, Belgium. 2. 2 Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Belgium. 3. 3 Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Santa Maria/HPV, CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal. 4. 4 Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway. 5. 5 Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Germany. 6. 6 German Center for Cardiovascular Research, partner site Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation has a class 1A recommendation in coronary artery disease and heart failure based on its beneficial effects on mortality, morbidity and quality of life. However, the inter-individual response to exercise training is highly variable and influenced by both training and patient characteristics. Notably, men and women display a different training response, even when accounting for age, height and lean muscle mass. Most studies investigating exercise effects on various physiological outcomes focus on male patients. Because women are understudied, the scientific evidence for tailored exercise prescription in women is still limited. METHODS: This narrative review summarises: (a) the underlying physiological determinants of the response to exercise training in women with cardiovascular disease, in which women rely more on fat than on carbohydrate oxidation during exercise, have lower aerobic capacities and smaller increases in cardiac function during exercise; (b) the benefits and barriers of exercise in women, in whom improving cardiometabolic risk and quality of life is weighed against socioeconomic and psychological needs; and (c) the relevance of different clinical endpoints in exercise trials such as maximum oxygen uptake, morbidity, mortality, training characteristics, quality of life and metabolic or vascular endpoints. RESULTS: Finally, we provide a perspective on how to improve referral, enrolment and adherence to exercise training in women, with structured approaches to inform the referring physician as well as the patient, and offering more flexible, gender-tailored or tele/smartphone-based programmes while addressing the socioeconomic and psychological needs of the patients. This may ultimately improve the admission, adherence and outcome of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in women.
BACKGROUND: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation has a class 1A recommendation in coronary artery disease and heart failure based on its beneficial effects on mortality, morbidity and quality of life. However, the inter-individual response to exercise training is highly variable and influenced by both training and patient characteristics. Notably, men and women display a different training response, even when accounting for age, height and lean muscle mass. Most studies investigating exercise effects on various physiological outcomes focus on male patients. Because women are understudied, the scientific evidence for tailored exercise prescription in women is still limited. METHODS: This narrative review summarises: (a) the underlying physiological determinants of the response to exercise training in women with cardiovascular disease, in which women rely more on fat than on carbohydrate oxidation during exercise, have lower aerobic capacities and smaller increases in cardiac function during exercise; (b) the benefits and barriers of exercise in women, in whom improving cardiometabolic risk and quality of life is weighed against socioeconomic and psychological needs; and (c) the relevance of different clinical endpoints in exercise trials such as maximum oxygen uptake, morbidity, mortality, training characteristics, quality of life and metabolic or vascular endpoints. RESULTS: Finally, we provide a perspective on how to improve referral, enrolment and adherence to exercise training in women, with structured approaches to inform the referring physician as well as the patient, and offering more flexible, gender-tailored or tele/smartphone-based programmes while addressing the socioeconomic and psychological needs of the patients. This may ultimately improve the admission, adherence and outcome of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in women.
Authors: Mildren A Del-Sueldo; María A Mendonça-Rivera; Martha B Sánchez-Zambrano; Judith Zilberman; Ana G Múnera-Echeverri; María Paniagua; Lourdes Campos-Alcántara; Claudia Almonte; Amalia Paix-Gonzales; Claudia V Anchique-Santos; Claudine J Coronel; Gabriela Castillo; María G Parra-Machuca; Ivanna Duro; Paola Varletta; Patricia Delgado; Verónica I Volberg; Adriana C Puente-Barragán; Adriana Rodríguez; Aida Rotta-Rotta; Anabela Fernández; Ana C Izeta-Gutiérrez; Ana E Ancona-Vadillo; Analía Aquieri; Andrea Corrales; Andrea Simeone; Bibiana Rubilar; Carolina Artucio; Carolina Pimentel-Fernández; Celi Marques-Santos; Clara Saldarriaga; Christian Chávez; Cristina Cáceres; Dahiana Ibarrola; Daniela Barranco; Edison Muñoz-Ortiz; Edith D Ruiz-Gastelum; Eduardo Bianco; Elena Murguía; Enrique Soto; Fabiola Rodríguez-Caballero; Fanny Otiniano-Costa; Giovanna Valentino; Iris B Rodríguez-Cermeño; Ivan R Rivera; Jairo A Gándara-Ricardo; Jesús A Velásquez-Penagos; Judith Torales; Karina Scavenius; Karen Dueñas-Criado; Laura García; Laura Roballo; Lucía R Kazelian; Macarena Coussirat-Liendo; María C Costa-Almeida; Mariana Drever; Mariela Lujambio; Marildes L Castro; Maritza Rodríguez-Sifuentes; Mónica Acevedo; Mónica Giambruno; Mónica Ramírez; Nancy Gómez; Narcisa Gutiérrez-Castillo; Onelia Greatty; Paola Harwicz; Patricia Notaro; Rocío Falcón; Rosario López; Sady Montefilpo; Sara Ramírez-Flores; Silvina Verdugo; Soledad Murguía; Sonia Constantini; Thais C Vieira; Virginia Michelis; César M Serra Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Date: 2022
Authors: Sydney E Valentino; Emily C Dunford; Jonathan Dubberley; Eva M Lonn; Martin J Gibala; Stuart M Phillips; Maureen J MacDonald Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-05
Authors: Isabel Witvrouwen; Dominique Mannaerts; An M Van Berendoncks; Yves Jacquemyn; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Eduardo M Vilela; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Ana Joao; Joana Braga; Susana Torres; Sofia Viamonte; José Ribeiro; Madalena Teixeira; José P Nunes; Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2021-12-26
Authors: Petr Winnige; Katerina Filakova; Jakub Hnatiak; Filip Dosbaba; Otakar Bocek; Garyfallia Pepera; Jannis Papathanasiou; Ladislav Batalik; Sherry L Grace Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-12 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: T Vromen; R W M Brouwers; H T Jorstad; R A Kraaijenhagen; R F Spee; M E Wittekoek; M J Cramer; J M C van Hal; L Hofstra; P M J C Kuijpers; E C de Melker; S F Rodrigo; M Sunamura; N H M K Uszko-Lencer; H M Kemps Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 2.380