| Literature DB >> 30889845 |
Zao Yi1, Jiajia Chen2, Chunlian Cen3, Xifang Chen4, Zigang Zhou5, Yongjian Tang6, Xin Ye7, Shuyuan Xiao8, Wei Luo9, Pinghui Wu10.
Abstract
The optical performanpan>pan> class="Chemical">ce of a periodically tunable plasma perfect metamaterial absorber based on a square-square-circle array we propose in the terahertz region is analyzed in this work by the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method. We not only discuss the impact of various parameters such as period a, length L, radius R, and incident angle θ under transverse magnetic (TM)- and transverse electric (TE)-polarization on the absorption spectra of the absorber but also study the effect of the Fermi energy EF and relaxation time τ. Finally, we simulate the spectra as the surrounding refractive index n changes to better evaluate the sensing performance of the structure, producing a sensitivity S of the structure of up to 15006 nm/RIU. On account of this research, we find that the absorber is beneficial to sensors and detectors in the terahertz region.Entities:
Keywords: FDTD method; graphene; perfect metamaterial absorber; surface plasmon resonance
Year: 2019 PMID: 30889845 PMCID: PMC6471937 DOI: 10.3390/mi10030194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(a) Diagrammatic sketch of a unit cell of the square-square-circle graphene array with its geometric parameters and the polarization and propagation of the light source. (b) Principle geometry of the top grid structure for the operating Fermi energy of graphene. VTG, VDS and IDS express the top gate voltage, the voltage and current flowing between Source and Drain, respectively.
Figure 2Absorption spectra for different values of period a. Other parameters remain fixed. The inserts indicate the distributions of the electric field (|E|) at a = 2200 nm.
Figure 3Absorption spectra for (a) different lengths L of the square and (b) different radii R of the circle. Other parameters remain fixed.
Figure 4Absorption spectra at different incident angles for (a) transverse magnetic (TM)-polarization and (b) transverse electric (TE)-polarization.
Figure 5(a) Absorption spectra for different Fermi energy (E) values with other parameters fixed. (b) The relationship between Fermi energy and the resonance wavelength.
Figure 6Absorption spectra for different relaxation times with other parameters fixed.
Figure 7(a) Absorption spectra for different values of surrounding refractive index n. Other parameters are unchanged. (b) Local details of absorption peaks.
Figure 8Simulated resonance wavelengths (black spots) and linear fit (red line) as a function of different values of surrounding refractive index n.
Sensitivity performance comparison between different absorber designs proposed in previous publications.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (μm/RIU) | 9.59 | 0.43 | 1.015 | 0.35 | 1.445 | 2.4 | 0.885 | 15.006 |