Literature DB >> 30889605

Prospective Analysis of the Predictive Value of Sonographic Pleural Fluid Echogenicity for the Diagnosis of Exudative Effusion.

Rachelle Asciak1, Maged Hassan2, Rachel M Mercer2, Robert J Hallifax2, John M Wrightson2, Ioannis Psallidas2, Najib M Rahman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion echogenicity on ultrasound has previously been suggested to allow identification of exudates. A case series suggested that homogenously echogenic effusions are always exudates. With modern imaging techniques and more advanced ultrasound technology, this may no longer be true.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to prospectively assess the predictive value of echogenicity in the identification of exudates.
METHOD: Patients undergoing thoracic ultrasound before pleural fluid sampling were analysed prospectively (n = 140). Pleural fluid was classified as an exudate if both fluid total protein (TP) > 29 g/L and fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 2/3 upper limit of normal serum LDH (which is 255 IU/L in females and 235 IU/L in males) were present. If only one of these criteria was met, the effusion was considered to have discordant biochemistry.
RESULTS: Fifty-five (39%) patients had non-echogenic and 85 (61%) had echogenic effusions. Six (7.1%) patients with echogenic effusions had transudates; the median fluid TP for this group was 18.5 g/L (IQR 9.75) and median LDH 63.0 IU/L (IQR 40.3). The specificity of echogenicity identifying exudates from transudates, excluding patients with discordant biochemistry, was 57.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 90.3%, sensitivity 65.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 21.0%. The specificity of echogenicity identifying exudates (including discordant biochemistry) from transudates was 57.1%, PPV 92.9%, sensitivity 62.7%, and NPV 14.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Echogenicity of a pleural effusion has a low specificity for identifying an underlying exudate, and the echogenic qualities of the fluid should not influence clinical decision-making.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exudate; Pleural disease; Pleural effusion; Pleural ultrasound; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30889605     DOI: 10.1159/000496153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respiration        ISSN: 0025-7931            Impact factor:   3.580


  5 in total

1.  Thoracic ultrasound for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Shiroshita; Sayumi Nozaki; Yu Tanaka; Yan Luo; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 2.  Diagnostics in Pleural Disease.

Authors:  Anand Sundaralingam; Eihab O Bedawi; Najib M Rahman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04

Review 3.  From Bedside to the Bench-A Call for Novel Approaches to Prognostic Evaluation and Treatment of Empyema.

Authors:  Sophia Karandashova; Galina Florova; Steven Idell; Andrey A Komissarov
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Pleural Fluid Echogenicity Measured by Ultrasound Image Pixel Density to Differentiate Transudative versus Exudative Pleural Effusions.

Authors:  Nilam J Soni; Zachary S Dreyfuss; Shane Ali; Austin Enenmoh; Kevin C Proud; Michael J Mader; Maria I Velez; Sean B Smith; Jay I Peters; Marcos I Restrepo
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-05

5.  Value of ultrasonography in determining the nature of pleural effusion: Analysis of 582 cases.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Ge Du; Liping Fang; Yang Bai; Zishuang Liu; Li Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.