| Literature DB >> 30889213 |
Surapathrudu Kanakala1, Murad Ghanim1.
Abstract
Bemisia tabaci is one of the most threatening pests in agriculture, causing significant losses to many important crops on a global scale. The dramatic increase and availability of sequence data for B. tabaci species complex and its bacterial endosymbionts is critical for developing emerging sustainable pest management strategies which are based on pinpointing the global diversity of this important pest and its bacterial endosymbionts. To unravel the global genetic diversity of B. tabaci species complex focusing on its associated endosymbionts, along with Israeli whitefly populations collected in this study, we combined available sequences in databases, resulting in a total of 4,253 mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) sequences from 82 countries and 1,226 16S/23S rRNA endosymbiont sequences from 32 countries that were analyzed. Using Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, we identified two new B. tabaci groups within the species complex and described the global distribution of endosymbionts within this complex. Our analyses revealed complex divergence of the different endosymbiont sequences within the species complex, with overall one Hamiltonella, two Porteria (P1 and P2), two Arsenophonus (A1 and A2), two Wolbachia (super-groups O and B), four Cardinium (C1-C4) and three Rickettsia (R1-R3) groups were identified. Our comprehensive analysis provides an updated important resource for this globally important pest and its secondary symbionts, which have been a major subject for research in last three decades.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30889213 PMCID: PMC6424426 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213946
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Bayesian phylogenetic tree inferred from mtCOI data using the GTR+G model.
Posterior probabilities for the branches are given. The proposed new species are indicated in bold and underlined.
Worldwide distribution of Bemisia tabaci species.
| No. | Country | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | India | Asia I, Asia I-India, Asia II 1, Asia II 5, Asia II 7, Asia II 8, Asia II 11, Asia II 13, MEAM K, China 3, MEAM1 |
| 2. | Pakistan | Asia I, Asia II 1, Asia II 5, Asia II 7, MEAM1 |
| 3. | Bangladesh | Asia I, Asia II 1, Asia II 5, China 3 |
| 4. | Nepal | Asia II 1 |
| 5. | Cambodia | MED, Asia I |
| 6. | Indonesia | Australia/Indonesia, Asia II 7, Asia II 12 |
| 7. | Malaysia | Asia I, MED, China 2, Asia II 7 |
| 8. | Myanmar | Asia II 5 |
| 9. | Singapore | Asia I |
| 10. | China | MED, MEAM1, Asia I, Asia II 1, Asia II 2, Asia II 3, Asia II 4, Asia II 6, Asia II 7, Asia II 9, Asia II 10, Asia IV, China 1, China 2, China 3, China 4 |
| 11. | Japan | MED, MEAM1, MEAM2, Asia I, Asia III, Japan 1, Japan 2, Asia II 1, Asia II 6 |
| 12. | South Korea | MED, MEAM1, Japan 2 |
| 13. | Taiwan | MED, MEAM1, Asia I, Asia III, Asia II 1, Asia II 6, Asia II 7 |
| 14. | Egypt | MED, MEAM1 |
| 15. | Iran | MEAM1 |
| 16. | Iraq | MEAM1 |
| 17. | Israel | MED, MEAM1 |
| 18. | Jordan | MEAM1 |
| 19. | Kuwait | MEAM1 |
| 20. | Saudi Arabia | MEAM1 |
| 21. | Syria | Asia II 1, MED, MEAM1 |
| 22. | Turkey | MED, MEAM1, Asia I |
| 23. | United Arab Emirates (UAE) | MEAM1 |
| 24. | Yemen | MEAM1 |
| 25. | Algeria | MED |
| 26. | Benin | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 27. | Burkina Faso | MED |
| 28. | Burundi | Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 29. | Cameroon | Africa, MED, Sub Saharan Africa 2, Sub Saharan Africa 3, Sub Saharan Africa 4 |
| 30. | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Sub Saharan Africa 1, Sub Saharan Africa 3 |
| 31. | Ghana | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 3, Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 32. | Ivory Coast | MED |
| 33. | Kenya | Sub Saharan Africa 1, Sub Saharan Africa 2 |
| 34. | Madagascar | Indian Ocean |
| 35. | Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa 1 |
| 36. | Mali | Sub Saharan Africa 2 |
| 37. | Mauritius | Indian Ocean |
| 38. | Morocco | MED, MEAM1, Spain 1 |
| 39. | Mozambique | Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 40. | Nigeria | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 2 |
| 41. | Senegal | MED, MEAM1 |
| 42. | Seychelles | Indian Ocean |
| 43. | Sudan | MED, New World |
| 44. | Swaziland | Sub-Saharan Africa 1 |
| 45. | South Africa | MED, MEAM1, Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 46. | Tanzania | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 47. | Togo | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 3 |
| 48. | Tunisia | MED, MEAM1, Sub Saharan Africa 2 |
| 49. | Uganda | Uganda, Indian Ocean, MED, Sub Saharan Africa 2, Sub Saharan Africa 5, Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 50. | Zambia | Sub Saharan Africa 1 |
| 51. | Zimbabwe | MED |
| 52. | Mayotte | MEAM1 |
| 53. | Reunion | MED, MEAM1, MEAM2, Indian Ocean |
| 54. | Bosnia and Herzegovina | MED |
| 55. | Croatia | MED, MEAM1 |
| 56. | Cyprus | MED, MEAM1 |
| 57. | Czech Republic | MED |
| 58. | France | MED, MEAM1, Indian Ocean, New World 1 |
| 59. | Greece | MED, MEAM1 |
| 60. | Italy | MED, MEAM1, Italy 1, Ru |
| 61. | Netherlands | MED |
| 62. | Netherlands Antilles | MEAM1 |
| 63. | Portugal | MED, Sub Saharan Africa 2 |
| 64. | Spain | MEAM1, MED, Sub Saharan Africa2, Sub Saharan Africa 3, Italy 2 |
| 65. | Australia, MEAM1 | |
| 66. | Argentina | MEAM1, New World 2, MED |
| 67. | Bolivia | New World 2 |
| 68. | Brazil | MEAM1,MED, New World 1, New World 2 |
| 69. | Colombia | New World 1 |
| 70. | Uruguay | MED |
| 71. | Venezuela | New World 1, MEAM1 |
| 72. | Cuba | MEAM1 |
| 73. | Belize | New World 1 |
| 74. | Trinidad and Tobago | MEAM1 |
| 75. | USA | MED, MEAM1, New World 1 |
| 76. | Canada | MED, MEAM1 |
| 77. | Honduras | New World 1 |
| 78. | Mexico | MED, MEAM1, New World 1 |
| 79. | Panama | New World 1 |
| 80. | Dominican Republic | MEAM1 |
| 81. | Guatemala | MED, MEAM1, New World 1 |
| 82. | Nauru | Asia II 5 |
| 83. | Puerto Rico | MEAM1, New World 1 |
Fig 2Schematic worldwide geographical distribution of Bemisia tabaci cryptic species and its bacterial endosymbionts.
B. tabaci endosymbionts in square brackets: -Arsenophonus, C-Cardinium, F-Fritschea, H-Hamiltonella, R-Rickettsia, P-Porteira, W-Wolbachia, -Hemipteriphilus.
Fig 3Molecular phylogenetic placements of Porteira (16S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an JC+G substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.
Fig 4Molecular phylogenetic placements of Rickettsia (16S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an GTR+I substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.
Fig 5Molecular phylogenetic placements of Hamiltonella (16S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an GTR+I substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.
Fig 6Molecular phylogenetic placements of Wolbachia (16S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an HKY substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.
Fig 7Molecular phylogenetic placements of Cardinium (16S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an GTR substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.
Fig 8Molecular phylogenetic placements of Aresenophonus (23S) from reported sequences of worldwide whitefly species.
The tree was constructed via Bayesian inference (BI) using an HKY+G substitution model. Sequences from Israel are indicated in bold.