Literature DB >> 30888715

A simple approximation to bias in the genetic effect estimates when multiple disease states share a clinical diagnosis.

Iryna Lobach1, Inyoung Kim2, Alexander Alekseyenko3, Siarhei Lobach4, Li Zhang5.   

Abstract

Case-control genome-wide association studies (CC-GWAS) might provide valuable clues to the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of complex diseases, such as neurodegenerative disease and cancer. A commonly overlooked complication is that multiple distinct disease states might present with the same set of symptoms and hence share a clinical diagnosis. These disease states can only be distinguished based on a biomarker evaluation that might not be feasible in the whole set of cases in the large number of samples that are typically needed for CC-GWAS. Instead, the biomarkers are measured on a subset of cases. Or an external reliability study estimates the frequencies of the disease states of interest within the clinically diagnosed set of cases. These frequencies often vary by the genetic and/or nongenetic variables. We derive a simple approximation that relates the genetic effect estimates obtained in a traditional logistic regression model with the clinical diagnosis as the outcome variable to the genetic effect estimates in the relationship to the true disease state of interest. We performed simulation studies to assess the accuracy of the approximation that we have derived. We next applied the derived approximation to the analysis of the genetic basis of the innate immune system of Alzheimer's disease.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; Kullback-Leibler divergence; bias; misclassification of disease status

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30888715      PMCID: PMC6559860          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  5 in total

1.  Understanding Conflicting Neuropathological Findings in Patients Clinically Diagnosed as Having Alzheimer Dementia.

Authors:  Stephen Salloway; Reisa Sperling
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Analysis of case-control studies of genetic and environmental factors with missing genetic information and haplotype-phase ambiguity.

Authors:  Christine Spinka; Raymond J Carroll; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Inflation of type I error rates due to differential misclassification in EHR-derived outcomes: Empirical illustration using breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Jianqiao Wang; Jessica Chubak; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Case-control studies of gene-environment interactions. When a case might not be the case.

Authors:  Iryna Lobach; Joshua Sampson; Alexander Alekseyenko; Siarhei Lobach; Li Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The impact of phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity on results of genome wide association studies of complex diseases.

Authors:  Mirko Manchia; Jeffrey Cullis; Gustavo Turecki; Guy A Rouleau; Rudolf Uher; Martin Alda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.