Literature DB >> 30888692

Stress resilience evidenced by grooming behaviour and dopamine levels in male mice selected for high and low immobility using the tail suspension test.

Thiago M Reis-Silva1,2,3, Thaisa M Sandini2, Atilio S Calefi2, Bruna C G Orlando3, Natalia Moreira2, Ana Paula N Lima2, Jorge C Florio2, Nicolle G T Queiroz-Hazarbassanov2, Maria Martha Bernardi1,2,3.   

Abstract

Grooming behaviour has different functions on many species during development and can be observed and affected during periods of stress. By selecting male mice with high (HI) and low (LI) immobility traits in the tail suspension test, a screening for antidepressant drugs, we investigate how these phenotypes associated with grooming behaviour may be influenced by the effects of repeated restraint stress. For this we used the sucrose preference test and the splash test in a novel and a familiar cage performed before and after exposure to 2 days of restraint stress. Animals were submitted to an additional day of restraint stress before the hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex and midbrain extraction for dopamine activity analysis. Corticosterone analysis was made in three distinct moments: without stress (prior first restraint session), immediately after the last restrain, and 1 hr after the last restrain episode. Compared to LI group, HI animals exhibited an increased frequency and decreased time of grooming in the familiar cage. In the novel cage, stress increased frequency and time of grooming of HI animals compared to LI. Corticosterone levels were increased in HI animals after 3 days of stress. Lower hypothalamic dopaminergic activity without stress and decreased hypothalamic dopaminergic activity immediately after stress in HI group were observed. The HI group displayed decreased prefrontal cortex dopaminergic activity and increased activity in the mesolimbic area. We proposed that through the influence of stress the two phenotypes manifested as a resilient (LI) and a not resilient (HI) trait in response to restraint stress.
© 2019 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral selection; brain structures; catecholamine; environmental stress

Year:  2019        PMID: 30888692     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  6 in total

Review 1.  Encore: Behavioural animal models of stress, depression and mood disorders.

Authors:  Aleksa Petković; Dipesh Chaudhury
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Dopamine receptor activation elicits a possible stress-related coping behavior in a wild-caught songbird.

Authors:  Melanie R Florkowski; Jessica L Yorzinski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  A mouse model of disuse osteoporosis based on a movable noninvasive 3D-printed unloading device.

Authors:  Junhui Li; Jiangyu Geng; Tingting Lin; Mingxiang Cai; Yao Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Hericium erinaceus mycelium ameliorate anxiety induced by continuous sleep disturbance in vivo.

Authors:  Tsung-Ju Li; Tung-Yen Lee; Yun Lo; Li-Ya Lee; I-Chen Li; Chin-Chu Chen; Fang-Chia Chang
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-12-05

5.  Activating PPARβ/δ Protects against Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Induced Astrocytic Apoptosis via UCP2-Dependent Mitophagy in Depressive Model.

Authors:  Juan Ji; Shangze Li; Zikai Jiang; Jianbing Yu; Yuqin Sun; Zhenyu Cai; Yinfeng Dong; Xiulan Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Enduring consequences of perinatal fentanyl exposure in mice.

Authors:  Jason B Alipio; Adam T Brockett; Megan E Fox; Stephen S Tennyson; Coreylyn A deBettencourt; Dina El-Metwally; Nikolas A Francis; Patrick O Kanold; Mary Kay Lobo; Matthew R Roesch; Asaf Keller
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.280

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.