PURPOSE: To answer the question whether arthroscopic subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace Balloon-ISB) implantation results in improved outcomes in patients suffering by irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT). Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of a combined ISB and arthroscopic partial repair procedure with those of a single ISB implantation without any repair. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre case series, based on prospectively collected data of patients who were suffering by irreparable MRCT, was conducted. An ISB implantation along with an arthroscopic non-anatomic repair or debridement was carried out in all patients included in this study. Patients were functionally evaluated with the use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score and the Constant score. Individual's pain was pre- and postoperatively measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (0-100/100). Patients' satisfaction and postoperative complications were also documented. As for the active range of motion (RoM), shoulder's forward flexion, external rotation at 0° and of 90° of abduction, and internal rotation were also pre- and postoperatively assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients [mean age: 65.2 years, standard deviation (SD): 8.5, and range: 50-80 years] with a mean follow-up of 22.1 months (SD: 9.8; range: 6-31 months) were reviewed. All final postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in comparison with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). The vast majority of the patients declared fully or almost fully satisfied with their treatment (80.6%), while most patients were free of pain at their last follow-up (83.9%). We identified 18 patients (group A), who were treated with a combined ISB implantation and arthroscopic non-anatomic repair and 13 patients (group B) who received an ISB implant without any repair. The long head of biceps, where existed, was tenotomized in both groups. No significant difference was found between the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups. As for the mean final postoperative scores and RoM, the differences between the two groups were insignificant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ISB implantation for patients suffering by MRCT leads to significantly improved mid-term outcomes and high patents' satisfaction. The additional use of arthroscopic partial repair with ISB was not proven superior to the single ISB implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; therapeutic case series.
PURPOSE: To answer the question whether arthroscopic subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace Balloon-ISB) implantation results in improved outcomes in patients suffering by irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT). Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of a combined ISB and arthroscopic partial repair procedure with those of a single ISB implantation without any repair. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre case series, based on prospectively collected data of patients who were suffering by irreparable MRCT, was conducted. An ISB implantation along with an arthroscopic non-anatomic repair or debridement was carried out in all patients included in this study. Patients were functionally evaluated with the use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score and the Constant score. Individual's pain was pre- and postoperatively measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (0-100/100). Patients' satisfaction and postoperative complications were also documented. As for the active range of motion (RoM), shoulder's forward flexion, external rotation at 0° and of 90° of abduction, and internal rotation were also pre- and postoperatively assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients [mean age: 65.2 years, standard deviation (SD): 8.5, and range: 50-80 years] with a mean follow-up of 22.1 months (SD: 9.8; range: 6-31 months) were reviewed. All final postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in comparison with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). The vast majority of the patients declared fully or almost fully satisfied with their treatment (80.6%), while most patients were free of pain at their last follow-up (83.9%). We identified 18 patients (group A), who were treated with a combined ISB implantation and arthroscopic non-anatomic repair and 13 patients (group B) who received an ISB implant without any repair. The long head of biceps, where existed, was tenotomized in both groups. No significant difference was found between the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups. As for the mean final postoperative scores and RoM, the differences between the two groups were insignificant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ISB implantation for patients suffering by MRCT leads to significantly improved mid-term outcomes and high patents' satisfaction. The additional use of arthroscopic partial repair with ISB was not proven superior to the single ISB implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; therapeutic case series.
Authors: P-H Flurin; P Landreau; T Gregory; P Boileau; N Brassart; O Courage; E Dagher; N Graveleau; S Guillo; J-F Kempf; L Lafosse; E Laprelle; B Toussaint Journal: Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot Date: 2005-12
Authors: Jonathan D Hughes; Brian Davis; Emily Whicker; Gregory R Sprowls; Lindsay Barrera; Ashkan Baradaran; Soheil Sabzevari; Jeremy M Burnham; Anup A Shah; Albert Lin Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: William L Johns; Nikhil Ailaney; Kevin Lacy; Gregory J Golladay; Jennifer Vanderbeck; Niraj V Kalore Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-10-16