Literature DB >> 30888419

Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA).

R P T Evans1, P Singh1,2, D Nepogodiev1,3, J Bundred1, S Kamarajah1, B Jefferies1, K Siaw-Acheampong1, K Wanigasooriya1, S McKay1, I Mohamed1, T Whitehouse4, D Alderson5, J Gossage6, R van Hillegersberg7, R S Vohra8, E A Griffiths3,9.   

Abstract

Esophagectomy is a mainstay in curative treatment for esophageal cancer; however, the reported techniques and outcomes can vary greatly. Thirty-day mortality of patients with an intact anastomosis is 2-3% as compared to 17-35% in patients who have an anastomotic leak. The subsequent management of leaks postesophagectomy has great global variability with little consensus on a gold standard of practice. The aim of this multicentre prospective audit is to analyze current techniques of esophagogastric anastomosis to determine the effect on the anastomotic leak rate. Leak rates and leak management will be assessed to determine their impact on patient outcomes. A 12-month international multicentre prospective audit started in April 2018 and is coordinated by a team from the West Midlands Research Collaborative. This will include patients undergoing esophagectomy over 9 months and encompassing a 90-day follow-up period. A pilot data collection period occurred at four UK centers in 2017 to trial the data collection form. The audit standards will include anastomotic leak and the conduit necrosis rate should be less than 13% and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more) should be less than 35%. The 30-day mortality rate should be less than 5% and the 90-day mortality rate should be less than 8%. This will be a trainee-led international audit of esophagectomy practice. Key support will be given by consultant colleagues and anesthetists. Individualized unit data will be distributed to the respective contributing sites. An overall anonymized report will be made available to contributing units. Results of the audit will be published in peer-reviewed journals with all collaborators fully acknowledged. The key information and results from the audit will be disseminated at relevant scientific meetings.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomotic leak; esophagectomy; outcome assessment (health care); prospective study

Year:  2020        PMID: 30888419     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

Review 1.  Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; James Bundred; Gary Spence; Andrew Kennedy; Bobby V M Dasari; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).

Authors: 
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Nutritional jejunostomy in esophagectomy for cancer, a national register-based cohort study of associations with postoperative outcomes and survival.

Authors:  Anders Holmén; Masaru Hayami; Eva Szabo; Ioannis Rouvelas; Thorhallur Agustsson; Fredrik Klevebro
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Postoperative outcomes in oesophagectomy with trainee involvement.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

Review 5.  Role of Radiology in the Preoperative Detection of Arterial Calcification and Celiac Trunk Stenosis and Its Association with Anastomotic Leakage Post Esophagectomy, an Up-to-Date Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Antonios Tzortzakakis; Georgios Kalarakis; Biying Huang; Eleni Terezaki; Emmanouil Koltsakis; Aristotelis Kechagias; Andrianos Tsekrekos; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Chyle Leak Following Esophagectomy for Cancers: An International Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Alessandro Parente; Richard P T Evans; Ademola Adeyeye; Alan Ainsworth; Alberto M L Takahashi; Alex Charalabopoulos; Andrew Chang; Atila Eroglue; Bas Wijnhoven; Claire Donohoe; Daniela Molena; Eider Talavera-Urquijo; Flavio Roberto Takeda; Gail Darling; German Rosero; Guillaume Piessen; Hans Mahendran; Hsu Po Kuei; Ines Gockel; Ionut Negoi; Jacopo Weindelmayer; Jari Rasanen; Kebebe Bekele; Guowei Kim; Lieven Depypere; Lorenzo Ferri; Magnus Nilsson; Frederik Klevebro; B Mark Smithers; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Peter Grimminger; Paul M Schneider; C S Pramesh; Raza Sayyed; Richard Babor; Shinji Mine; Simon Law; Suzanne Gisbertz; Tim Bright; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Donald Low; Pritam Singh; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Ann Surg Open       Date:  2022-08-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.